Someone's SCARED: Liz Cheney Responds to Trump Saying J6 Committee Members Should be...
Cue the ARGLE BARGLE RAR! Just for FUN, Check Out this LEGENDARY Thread...
Libs of TikTok NUKES NBC from Orbit With Mother of ALL Fact-Checks for...
Bill Melugin Spots Something Missing From Biden DHS's Press Release on Fentanyl Traffickin...
Mike Lee Breaks Out the Puppets and Crayons to EDUCATE Media/Lefties on the...
PolitiFact Explains Why All the $$$ Biden's Sending Overseas Isn't Taking Away From...
HA! Never Trump Bulwarkian Tools TROUNCED for Pushing to Deport Illegals Because Hispanics...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
‘Journalist’ Shocked Trump’s Appointees Will Do Their Jobs Without Having to Be Asked
Senate Speculation: Lara Trump Announces She’s Stepping Down as RNC Co-Chair
Buyer’s Remorse: Martha Raddatz Mad Over Deportation Price Tag She Voted for in...
Tales From the Creep: Carville Says Tucker Carlson’s Bow Tie Reigns Supreme Over...
Trump Says He'll Pardon Jan. 6 Protestors. He's Right to Do So
Trump's New Cologne 'Ad' Is a Master Level Troll
Pay Attention to Me! Adam Kinzinger Invokes Trump’s Name in Fruitless Quest for...

Unpopular: Mattel Faces Lawsuit Over Wicked Toy Typo

Eric Liebowitz/NBC via AP

Recently, we told you how Mattel made a rather unfortunate mistake on the packaging for its 'Wicked' dolls. Namely, the website listed on the box was not directing curious users to the movie's page but to an adult site.

Advertisement

Yikes.

Now one mom is suing the toy giant for the 'distress' this mistake caused her and her daughter:

More from Variety:

Mattel is being sued for mistakenly printing the URL for a pornographic site on the packaging for special-edition “Wicked” dolls.

According to court documents, a South Carolina resident is launching a class action lawsuit after purchasing the toy for her young daughter, who visited the X-rated website that had “nothing to do with the ‘Wicked’ doll.” The toy company mistakenly listed a similarly-titled website for the adult-entertainment site Wicked Pictures, rather than the official page for the Universal Pictures film, starring Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande. The plaintiff alleges that Mattel didn’t offer a refund and believes she and her child suffered “emotional distress” from the misprint.

Look, is it less than ideal? Yes.

Is this worth a lawsuit?

No.

Advertisement

This writer's cynical side would not be surprised.

Yeah, this doesn't pass the smell test.

Oh, look.

This'll be the defense's Exhibit A.

And if the kid clicked without parental supervision, why weren't the parents supervising this?

Advertisement

Exactly as we said above.

Heh.

We're sure Mattel's lawyers will be all over this.

We are not at all surprised. 

People sue for everything and anything.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement