WACKO E. Jean Carroll's BIZARRE Post About Trump Does NOT Sound Like Something...
What Is WRONG with Taylor Lorenz? Really. Sane People Don't Giggle and Express...
Lawyer UP, Pencil-Neck! Adam Schiff Shares Personal Backstory in Emotional Thread and WOW...
*SNORT* AOC's 2023 Airhead Take on Subway Safety Goes VIRAL After Daniel Penny...
FACES of CNN Panel as Scott Jennings Literally DRAWS Pics to Help Them...
BOOMITY! Donald Trump Names Harmeet Dhillon as Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights
Tom Cotton Says ALL of Trump's Cabinet Nominees Will Be Confirmed by the...
‘Captain America’ Actor Chris Evans Returns To ‘Avengers’ Franchise But Possibly in New...
Now It Can Be Told! Joe Biden’s Totally REAL Not Made Up Priorities...
New Year’s Leave: Why Staying Home with an Early Bedtime Is the Latest...
‘Border Czar’ Tom Homan Tells Two Dem Leaders Their City and State ‘Suck’...
Win-Win: Kari Lake Mexico Ambassador Rumors Thrill Her Supporters and Detractors
New Road Rules: There’s No Steering Clear of Elon Musk’s Driverless Future
Hot Take: Gender Diversity Has Been Part of the Catholic Church Since the...
Report: Taylor Lorenz and Vox Are Breaking Up … Or Are They?

Unpopular: Mattel Faces Lawsuit Over Wicked Toy Typo

Eric Liebowitz/NBC via AP

Recently, we told you how Mattel made a rather unfortunate mistake on the packaging for its 'Wicked' dolls. Namely, the website listed on the box was not directing curious users to the movie's page but to an adult site.

Advertisement

Yikes.

Now one mom is suing the toy giant for the 'distress' this mistake caused her and her daughter:

More from Variety:

Mattel is being sued for mistakenly printing the URL for a pornographic site on the packaging for special-edition “Wicked” dolls.

According to court documents, a South Carolina resident is launching a class action lawsuit after purchasing the toy for her young daughter, who visited the X-rated website that had “nothing to do with the ‘Wicked’ doll.” The toy company mistakenly listed a similarly-titled website for the adult-entertainment site Wicked Pictures, rather than the official page for the Universal Pictures film, starring Cynthia Erivo and Ariana Grande. The plaintiff alleges that Mattel didn’t offer a refund and believes she and her child suffered “emotional distress” from the misprint.

Look, is it less than ideal? Yes.

Is this worth a lawsuit?

No.

Advertisement

This writer's cynical side would not be surprised.

Yeah, this doesn't pass the smell test.

Oh, look.

This'll be the defense's Exhibit A.

And if the kid clicked without parental supervision, why weren't the parents supervising this?

Advertisement

Exactly as we said above.

Heh.

We're sure Mattel's lawyers will be all over this.

We are not at all surprised. 

People sue for everything and anything.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos