Scientific American Endorses Kamala Harris for all the Science She'd Bring
Amid Lawsuit, Media Share Images of OceanGate Submersible Wreckage on Ocean Floor
Peter Doocy Asks KJP How Many More Times She's Going to Call Trump...
LOL! New Jersey's X Account Wins the Internet With Possible New State Motto
WATCH: Partisan Hack David Muir Doing MAJOR Damage Control As His Show Ratings...
Democrats Use IVF As a Political Football: Despicable Senate Dems Block Rick Scott's...
Fake Liberal 'Bomb Threat' Hoax Blows Up: CNN Heads Explode!
Keith Olbermann Tries Picking a Fight with Brett Favre Over Pro-American Post and...
Tell Us Something We DON'T KNOW: The Hill Says Democrats Believe Kamala Harris...
JD Vance Shuts Hillary Clinton DOWN for Pushing to Jail Americans Over Speech...
David Frum TORCHED for Tone-Deaf Thread Trying to JUSTIFY Media Driving Dems to...
You Mad, Bro? Edward Snowden DRAGGED for Trying to Shame Israel Over Hezbollah's...
Ana Navarro Falls Flat on Her Face RUSHING to Blame JD Vance for...
NUT FREE ZONE: Here's Some of the Most EXPLODINGLY Funny Pager Memes Following...
GHOULS: Mary Katharine Ham Takes The Hill APART for Making 2nd Trump Shooting...
Premium

First They Came for the Centi-Millionaires

AP Photo/Susan Walsh

In April of this year, President Biden -- then still the presumptive Democratic candidate for 2024 -- proposed a capital gains tax of 44.6%, including a 25% 'unrealized' capital gains tax on people making over $100 million dollars. At the time, I said it would wreck the economy.

And it would.

It's a policy Kamala Harris intends to enact should she be elected into office.

But don't worry, they reassure us: it's only for 'high-net-worth' individuals. Right now, that's anyone worth $100 million or more. 

Absent winning the lottery, it's a tax bracket I will never see. 

Confederate General Robert E. Lee once said 'It is history that teaches us to hope', and it is history that also teaches us. So indulge me for a moment with a little history.

The first income tax was enacted by Abraham Lincoln in 1862 to offset the cost of the Civil War. That tax levied a 3 percent tax on incomes between $600 and $10,000 and a 5 percent tax on incomes of more than $10,000. In 1867, that tax was lowered and most revenue came from the sales of alcohol and tobacco. The income tax was repealed in 1872.

In 1913, Congress ratified the 16th Amendment, giving them 'the power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census or enumeration.' Congress then enacted a 1% tax on personal income of more than $3,000 with a surtax of 6 percent on incomes of more than $500,000.

While the IRS says the average income in 1913 was $3,900 -- my research showed the average hourly wage for production workers was $0.20 an hour, or $416 per year (working 40 hours per week). Professionals such as accountants or mechanical engineers earned more. But most Americans earned far less than the $3,000 income threshold laid out by the IRS.

Today, if you're a single payer and you earn more than $11,001 your tax rate is 12%. The federal poverty level for a single person on 2024 is $15,060, in case you were wondering.

My point is this: today Kamala and her supporters tell you that her capital gains tax plan only applies to the ultra rich, and will never impact you. History shows us that is a lie.

What started out as an income tax of a small percentage of high earners in 1913 now applies to the majority of Americans.

And all those centi-millionaries? Well, here's what they'll do if this policy becomes law:

The entire post reads:

But let's look at this further (since Dems can never figure out the unintended consequences):  If you're going to tax me 25% on gains I haven't even realized yet (but offer me no way to write off losses without special dispensation or to claw back those taxes if the gains become losses), and 45% on realized gains...why the hell would I continue to put as much of my capital into the markets vs. tax sheltered investments, foreign investments, straight cash, etc?  I wouldn't.  

So TRILLIONS in capital will flee the markets all at once, causing a massive downtrend in the markets - obliterating your little Roth IRA in the process.  Every calculation for investments will have to be re-factored; a process that will take years.  In the meantime, you're on the bread lines and I'm sitting on a pile of cash.

Didn't affect me.  DID affect you.

Kamala's policy will take vast amounts of wealth out of the economy. The centi-millionaires will essentially vanish by removing their money from the markets.

What do you think the Democrats would do then? Give up the plan? Restore sane tax rates?

Nah.

They'll do the same thing they did after they enacted the income tax in 1913: continue expanding the law, lowering the definition of wealth and taking taxes from people like you and me. Including taxes on 'unrealized gains' which will impact our retirement accounts, our stock portfolios, and even our houses.

Most Americans cannot afford that. It will bankrupt us, force us to sell off our homes and cash out our investments.

So don't kid yourself: this isn't a tax that'll only impact the ultra-wealthy. 

It will impact all of us. Badly.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement