HA! Biden Was So OFF During His BIZARRE (Whispering?!) Presser That Even Rachel...
Team Biden Shifts Into 'the Jerk Store Called' Overdrive to Fire Back at...
'Super Bowl for Insane People Who Follow Politics' - Ken Klippenstein
Jake Tapper Shares Text Message From Sad Longtime Biden Advisor And People Are...
Salon Writing a Piece About the Prospects of a Special Counsel Investigating Clarence...
Here's Blinken, Austin and Sullivan Reacting to Biden Praising 'Vice President Trump' Duri...
In 'True Gretch,' Gov. Gretchen Whitmer Recalls How Terrifying the Plot to Kidnap...
ABC News: Democrat Congressman Says Biden 'Seemed Altered' at Juneteenth Event
Three Biden Officials Tell NBC News His Chances of Winning Are Zero
President Biden Holds His 'Big Boy' Press Conference, Praises Vice President Donald Trump
Axios - Journalists Are Such Timid Creatures Who Were Hurt By Biden's 'Hidden'...
CNN Reports on Tractor Supply Ignoring the Risks of Not Pandering to the...
Radio Station Edited Biden’s Interview at Biden Campaign's Request
President Biden Introduces Volodymyr Zelenskyy as 'President Putin'
New Candidates for MAID? Watch Justin Trudeau Say Some Older Canadians Live in...

Tell Us Something We DON'T Know: Report Reveals Wikipedia's Left-Wing Bias Links the Right to 'Fear'

Fuzzy Chimp (Photo by SHVETS production on Pexels and public domain flag picture)

Back in May, we told you about Wikipedia and its Orwellian editing of the article on the 'Appeal to Heaven' flag after the media decided this flag was a symbol of insurrection.


So it's no surprise Wikipedia has a Left-wing bias, but here's a report confirming it:

More from The Manhattan Institute:

In general, we find that Wikipedia articles tend to associate right-of-center public figures with somewhat more negative sentiment than left-of-center public figures; this trend can be seen in mentions of U.S. presidents, Supreme Court justices, congressmembers, state governors, leaders of Western countries, and prominent U.S.-based journalists and media organizations. We also find prevailing associations of negative emotions (e.g., anger and disgust) with right-leaning public figures and positive emotions (e.g., joy) with left-leaning public figures. In some categories of terms, such as the names of U.K. MPs and U.S.-based think tanks, we find no evidence of a difference in sentiment.

Our results suggest that Wikipedia is not living up to its stated neutral–point–of–view policy. This is concerning because we find evidence of some of Wikipedia’s prevailing sentiment associations for politically aligned public figures also popping up in OpenAI’s language models, which suggests that the political bias that we identify on the site may be percolating into widely used AI systems.


This is a problem.

Of course we did.

Yes, it should be.

It's not, but of course they belive this.

Always will be.

Not a soul.

Just like we don't have time to protest at noon on Wednesday. We have jobs and responsibilities.

This writer just finished her BSN and you still can't use it in an academic paper.


Yeah, printed materials are probably a good way to go these days.

We detect a hint of sarcasm here.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Twitchy Videos