Hope Walz Says Republicans' Obsession With Old State Flag Is Like a Racist...
Appeals Court Says Administration's Argument to Allow the IRS to Share Data With...
A Call From the 83rd Floor, a Mother’s Life’s Work, and a...
MS NOW’s New Membership Service Allows Users to Talk to Rachel Maddow, Joe...
The Actual Problem in the Clancy Mistrial Wasn’t the Holdout — It Was...
Joy Reid Couldn’t Wash It Off: Wajahat Ali Goes Shopping for a New...
Arlington County to Pay Families of Wage-Earners Detained by ICE Up to $2,000
Danbury, Connecticut City Council Votes to Allow Noncitizens to Be Hired As Police...
Caught on Tape: Nebraska 'Independent' Admits He Only Backed the Wall to Win...
Site Runs 'Hit Piece' on CA Assemblyman Who Sent $6 Million to His...
'Do Us a Favor and Stay Home': Families Confront Mamdani Over 9/11 Ceremony
CNN’s Anderson Cooper Examines the Need for Climate Justice ($$$) in Nepal
American Heroes of 9/11: Welles Crowther
Cartoon Cancer: Animated Gavin Newsom Says Having the DSA Under the Dems' ‘Big...
Prof Says ‘Someone Can Do the Funniest Thing’ to Nick Shirley Before the...

How About NO? CBS Earns MASSIVE Ratio for Saying We Should Swap Foods to Fight Climate Change

Journalism meme

You don't despise the media enough. Not nearly enough. They are a propaganda arm for the Left and the Democratic Party (but we repeat ourselves), and they'll push any agenda they like really, really hard.

Advertisement

They keep trying to make eating bugs a thing, and they keep harassing us over our food choices because eating bugs and veggie lasagna will magically change the climate.

Let's make this clear: anyone that says carbon emissions come from food and agriculture wants you to starve to death. You are the carbon they want to reduce.

CBS writes:

Swapping meat lasagna for vegetarian isn't just healthier for you — it's also healthier for the planet. And a new study shows just how much each swap, like switching beef for chicken in stew, saves greenhouse gas emissions.

Switching food and drink purchases to very similar but more environmentally friendly alternatives could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from household groceries by nearly a quarter, according to the George Institute for Global Health and Imperial College London  study shows in a new study. 

The study released Tuesday aims to show that consumers do not have to make drastic changes — like giving up meat — to make smarter, climate-conscious choices that aggregate to make an impact on carbon reduction, lead author Allison Gaines tells CBS News. 

"But while consumers are increasingly aware of the environmental impact of the food system and willing to make more sustainable food choices, they lack reliable information to identify the more environmentally friendly options," said Gaines, who has a doctorate in public health.

Advertisement

Pardon us while we roll our eyes.

Yep.

And they'll gladly let you starve if they think they're morally superior.

They won't back it up or withdraw it. They'll just keep banging this drum.

Remember: YOU are the carbon they want to reduce.

Oh, this doesn't apply to them, just us.

It'll never end, because they'll keep doing this until they get their way.

We have to keep fighting back.

They're special. Or something.

Advertisement

Yes, there is.

And we all know why.

Nope. Neither are we.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement