Bloodsucker Proxy: Communist Asks for a DSA Mascot, Gets a Whole Lot More
Ron DeSantis Shares Headline That Sums Up Healthcare in 2026
Sen. Chuck Grassley Argues for a Diesel Embargo
Ed Sheeran Should Have Listened to Dana Loesch — NEVER Bend the Knee...
Jonathan Karl Remembers the First Amendment
Take the L, Barack: You Pulled the SAME 'Ban the Media' Stunt You're...
Dana Bash Tries Shaming Mike Walz for Defending Trump's CNN Ban and WOW,...
HOOBOY: Amy Klobuchar Caught Using the Same Pic Trying to Connect With Normies...
Look Out Elizabeth Warren, Peggy Flanagan Is Coming for YOUR Grift (and She's...
Troy Jackson Dodging This Particular Question Is Just DAMNING on So Many Levels...
TWOCH Full VOD Episode 09192026
WATCH: Student BIZARRELY Flips Out After Black Pro-Lifer Hits Back on Her ‘Kirk...
Guess Who Came to Dinner? Abdul El-Sayed's 'Lesbian Rosh Hashanah' Stunt BACKFIRES Spectac...
The Hack Is Back: Podcaster Jim Acosta Abandons Pool Duty to Encourage ‘Journo’...
Judge Says the Dumbest Thing Possible When SENTENCING a Hero Who Stopped a...

How About NO? CBS Earns MASSIVE Ratio for Saying We Should Swap Foods to Fight Climate Change

Journalism meme

You don't despise the media enough. Not nearly enough. They are a propaganda arm for the Left and the Democratic Party (but we repeat ourselves), and they'll push any agenda they like really, really hard.

Advertisement

They keep trying to make eating bugs a thing, and they keep harassing us over our food choices because eating bugs and veggie lasagna will magically change the climate.

Let's make this clear: anyone that says carbon emissions come from food and agriculture wants you to starve to death. You are the carbon they want to reduce.

CBS writes:

Swapping meat lasagna for vegetarian isn't just healthier for you — it's also healthier for the planet. And a new study shows just how much each swap, like switching beef for chicken in stew, saves greenhouse gas emissions.

Switching food and drink purchases to very similar but more environmentally friendly alternatives could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from household groceries by nearly a quarter, according to the George Institute for Global Health and Imperial College London  study shows in a new study. 

The study released Tuesday aims to show that consumers do not have to make drastic changes — like giving up meat — to make smarter, climate-conscious choices that aggregate to make an impact on carbon reduction, lead author Allison Gaines tells CBS News. 

"But while consumers are increasingly aware of the environmental impact of the food system and willing to make more sustainable food choices, they lack reliable information to identify the more environmentally friendly options," said Gaines, who has a doctorate in public health.

Advertisement

Pardon us while we roll our eyes.

Yep.

And they'll gladly let you starve if they think they're morally superior.

They won't back it up or withdraw it. They'll just keep banging this drum.

Remember: YOU are the carbon they want to reduce.

Oh, this doesn't apply to them, just us.

It'll never end, because they'll keep doing this until they get their way.

We have to keep fighting back.

They're special. Or something.

Advertisement

Yes, there is.

And we all know why.

Nope. Neither are we.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement