Commie Chameleon: DSA Co-Chair Says It’s Not Extreme to Abolish Capitalism, Senate, and...
Red, White, and Ewww: The View’s Sunny Hostin Says American Flags in Neighborhoods...
Hot Take: The ‘Do Not Comply’ Crowd Who Opposed Masking Thinks Illegals Should...
Riddle of the Sphincter: Did Dem Chuck Schumer Pass Something in the Senate...
The Atlantic: The Democratic Manly Man Is Back as Dems Embrace Masculinity
Activist Judge Frees Plane Hijacker Awaiting Deportation
Gay Couple Sues Surrogate for Not Aborting Baby With Cleft Lip
Study: Apple and Google News Suppressed Negative Stories About Graham Platner for Months
Independent Journalist Jim Acosta Is Back at the Reflecting Pool, Reporting No Signs...
Flake E. Jean Carroll Receives $5.62 Million Payment From President Trump
All Hell Breaks Loose After ICE Shooting As Democrats Caught Lying Again
So, Yeah ... THIS Is Gonna Suck: Little House on the Prairie Remake...
Seven Years of Lies and B.S.: Gov. Whitmer's Social Media Guru Gets MOCKED...
Mentally Ill Guy Who Thinks He's a Woman Applied for Asylum in the...
ICE Instructed to Cease Most Traffic Stops

How About NO? CBS Earns MASSIVE Ratio for Saying We Should Swap Foods to Fight Climate Change

Journalism meme

You don't despise the media enough. Not nearly enough. They are a propaganda arm for the Left and the Democratic Party (but we repeat ourselves), and they'll push any agenda they like really, really hard.

Advertisement

They keep trying to make eating bugs a thing, and they keep harassing us over our food choices because eating bugs and veggie lasagna will magically change the climate.

Let's make this clear: anyone that says carbon emissions come from food and agriculture wants you to starve to death. You are the carbon they want to reduce.

CBS writes:

Swapping meat lasagna for vegetarian isn't just healthier for you — it's also healthier for the planet. And a new study shows just how much each swap, like switching beef for chicken in stew, saves greenhouse gas emissions.

Switching food and drink purchases to very similar but more environmentally friendly alternatives could reduce greenhouse gas emissions from household groceries by nearly a quarter, according to the George Institute for Global Health and Imperial College London  study shows in a new study. 

The study released Tuesday aims to show that consumers do not have to make drastic changes — like giving up meat — to make smarter, climate-conscious choices that aggregate to make an impact on carbon reduction, lead author Allison Gaines tells CBS News. 

"But while consumers are increasingly aware of the environmental impact of the food system and willing to make more sustainable food choices, they lack reliable information to identify the more environmentally friendly options," said Gaines, who has a doctorate in public health.

Advertisement

Pardon us while we roll our eyes.

Yep.

And they'll gladly let you starve if they think they're morally superior.

They won't back it up or withdraw it. They'll just keep banging this drum.

Remember: YOU are the carbon they want to reduce.

Oh, this doesn't apply to them, just us.

It'll never end, because they'll keep doing this until they get their way.

We have to keep fighting back.

They're special. Or something.

Advertisement

Yes, there is.

And we all know why.

Nope. Neither are we.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement