Trump Cuts Off Trade With Spain After It Refuses to Let US Use...
For All of Us Who've Learned It the Hard Way: Grief's Quiet Lesson
'Always Money for War' Whines Senator Who Can’t Read a Budget—or a Bible
ICE Watch Activist Strolls Into Kristi Noem’s Senate Hearing Carrying Massive Backpack
LIVE ELECTION RESULTS: Primary Night in Texas and North Carolina!
CA State Sen. Scott Wiener Says Children Will Die If Teachers Must Out...
The Atlantic Wonders If a Bearded Pete Buttigieg Can Convince America He’s a...
DHS Says It Won't Comply With Denver's New Ban on Law Enforcement Agents...
Kurt Schlichter BODYING Conservative Wannabe Whining About Trump's Iran Strikes Is a BEAUT...
Operation Epic Fury Reminds MS NOW’s Chris Hayes of 9/11
ICE SHREDS 'Asinine, Legally Illiterate' Abigail Spanberger for Putting Violent Illegal Ov...
Iranian-American Journo Masiah Alinejad Has a DIRECT MESSAGE Just for Kamala Harris and...
'Secret' Iran Supreme Leader Meeting Destroyed As Rubio Sets the Record Straight
Wait, What?! Bill Clinton Casually Drops YUGE JB Pritzker Epstein Bombshell During His...
What a DICK! Jonathan Turley OWNS Richard Blumenthal With His OWN Words for...

Orwell to White Courtesy Phone: NYT Argues Government Surveillance Keeps Us Safe, Earns MASSIVE Scorn

Meme screenshot

You don't despise the media enough. You really don't. They've morphed into the propaganda arm of the Democrat party and big government, and think we should admire them for it.

Advertisement

So it's really no surprise the New York Times op-ed section goes all in on government surveillance as a good thing for society.

Here's the original post from the NYT:

Sure, Jan.

Even Pravda is aghast.

Yes it has been.

Here's some of the Orwellian drivel from the op-ed:

Although Section 702 can be used only to target foreigners abroad, it does include Americans when they interact with foreign targets. Not only is such incidental collection inevitable in today’s globalized world; it can be vital to U.S. security. If a terrorist or spy abroad is communicating with someone here, our government must find out why.

Some of what is found via Section 702 is therefore sent from the National Security Agency to the F.B.I. The F.B.I., which investigates threats to national security in the United States, can then check that database for Americans under investigation for national security reasons.

We agree that those queries raise legitimate privacy concerns. And those concerns are especially acute for public officials and journalists whose communications with foreign officials and other potential intelligence targets may be sensitive for political or professional reasons.

It is also true that the F.B.I. has broken the rules around these 702 database checks repeatedly in recent years. Agents ran improper queries related to elected officials and political protests.

Advertisement

They even admit the FBI has broken rules, but it's okay because reasons.

It's meaningless, that oath.

The Democrat-controlled Senate can blatantly ignore their Constitutional duty; what makes anyone think the FBI, CIA, or other agency will abide by its oaths of office?

Yep.

Undoubtedly we are.

Reality bites. Hard.

They did, and used it as an instruction manual.

Some people. Trust in the media has hit at an all-time low. Can't imagine why that is.

Advertisement

Bingo. How many terrorists are coming across the open border

Yes they have been.

It's real.

Up is down, right is wrong.

Just incredible stuff.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement