The Supreme Court Rules on Deportations to Third-Party Countries (LAWSPLAINING)
UK Home Secretary Reopening Resettlement Schemes for Palestinians Who Have Fled the Horror...
Sen. Mark Warner Says 100,000 Virginians Have Been Kicked Off of SNAP Because...
Sunny Hostin Defended the Cornell 7 — and, Painfully, She’s Right
Rev. Suggests Lazarus Was Gay Because Jesus Called for Him to ‘Come Out’
Rep. LaMonica McIver Is Facing Prison for Touching ICE Officers — She Just...
Mamdani the Pied-À-Terrible: NYC Mayor Loses in Court on Tax-The-Rich Rollout
The Bulwark’s Focus Group Says Abdul El-Sayed Is Over-Performing With Trump Voters
Kyle Kulinski Has No Doubt Mossad Has Videos of Trump 'Doing Ungodly Things...
Cory Booker Thinks a Criminal Who Undermined One Election Is Very Likely to...
Tight Race, Tight Pants: James Talarico Victory Could Obliterate State Religion of Texas...
Venezuelan Shot by ICE Charged by DOJ With Assaulting a Federal Officer
El-Sayed Wants Money Out of Politics — Except the Soros Family That Hand-Selected...
Jack Smith Subpoenaed Checks From Thousands of Americans Who Donated As Little As...
The Cornell 7: Viral Outrage, Changing Statements, and Why Prosecutors May Have Walked...

'Talk About Tone Deaf': London Cop Tells Jewish Woman to Take Swastikas 'In Context'

Twitter

There are only a few groups in the world who would be told to take an offensive symbol in 'context'. In a world where 'misgendering' and 'microaggressions' are a thing, context and nuance don't exist anymore. Unless you're a Jew in London, apparently.

Advertisement

More from Fox News:

Video of a police officer in London having a heated discussion with a woman about the offensiveness of swastikas has circulated across social media.

The video was taken on Saturday during a massive pro-Palestinian rally that the Metropolitan Police were monitoring. In the video, a visibly upset woman confronted the officer about an anti-Israeli participant who allegedly showed off a swastika.

The officer did not seem to agree that swastikas are offensive symbols that threaten public order. He cited the Public Order Act 2023, which he said outlines and limits what police handle at protests. 

Here is the video in question:

Mind you, the London police arrested a man with an anti-Hamas sign.

But a swastika requires 'context'.

The police responded to the video:

Why do we get the sneaking suspicion this wouldn't apply if the offender was, say, a white heterosexual man with a Bible?

Advertisement

We all heard it.

We all know what they're doing, too.

In historical documentaries, textbooks, and movies or plays, yes there is.

At an anti-Israel rally? We know the context.

Just a bang-up job.

Yep.

Tone-deaf is putting it mildly.

As the other poster said, history is intentionally not being taught so it can be repeated.

'Extremely alarmed' is an understatement.

Advertisement

Yes, it does.

They know their role: to enforce woke, politically correct Orwellian laws that protect preferred groups, while harassing, arresting, and punishing groups that aren't prefered.

It's a two-tiered justice system, by design.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 50% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement