Chelsea Handler’s 'Brutal' Draft Roast Implodes: Ma’am, Men Have Been Registering at 18...
White TN State Rep Mobbed by Racists in Scene Reminiscent of Little Rock...
The Bulwark's Sam Stein Spins His Latest Fiction: Turns Duffy's Weekend Drives Into...
NYT’s Nicholas Kristof Spreads the Israeli Rape Dogs Smear
Nonprofit Files Lawsuit to Stop Repainting of the 'Solemn and Hallowed' Reflecting Pool
Safeguards? Nah. Ohio Flipped the Off Switch on Medicaid Verification and Let the...
Bernie Wonders Why Everything Sucks After Tripling Premiums, Printing Money, and Importing...
Hakeem Jeffries Gets Boxed in: He Might Never Win Again
AOC Says States Like TN Want to 'Wipe Out Every Black Representative' While...
Bill Melugin Schools Democrats: No, Biden Did Fly in Hundreds of Thousands of...
Hakeem Jeffries Makes It Clear His 'Trump Threatens Our Norms and Institutions' BS...
The Left's Meltdown Over the Lincoln Memorial Pool Is a Perfect Reflection ......
John Fetterman's Take on Assassination Attempt Deniers Will Enrage 'Tinfoil Hat Brigade' D...
Ro Khana Trips SPECTACULARLY Over Tim Scott While RANTING About Zero Black South...
Mark Kelly Pulls Out His Shovel and Keeps Digging Over His Classified Info...

'Disappointing': Elon Musk Reacts to SCOTUS Rejecting 2014 Twitter Lawsuit on Twitter Surveillance

AP Photo/Kirsty Wigglesworth, Pool

Back in 2014, long before Elon Musk took the helm, Twitter/X filed a lawsuit after the FBI said they could not disclose how often the federal government requested user data in the company's annual transparency reports. The lawsuit meandered its way through the court system and, in March of last year, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against the suit.

Advertisement

Now, the Supreme Court has declined to take up the case.

The New York Post reports:

The US Supreme Court on Monday rejected a request by Elon Musk’s X Corp. to consider whether the social media company, formerly called Twitter, can publicly disclose how often federal law enforcement seeks information about users for national security investigations.

The justices declined to hear X’s appeal of a lower court’s ruling holding that the FBI’s restrictions on what the company could say publicly about the investigations did not violate its free speech rights under the Constitution’s First Amendment.

X had said it was “critical” for the justices to take up the case to establish clear standards for when and how tech companies can speak about government demands for confidential information about their users for surveillance.

Because of 'national security concerns', the courts ruled against Twitter/X.

Advertisement

We're not surprised by the ruling.

Very disappointing.

An excellent question. One we'll never get a direct answer to.

Very little. Next to zero.

Remember how KJP said this administration is committed to transparency just yesterday? We do.

There's no good reason to keep it a secret. So we'd like to know why as well.

Do you feel safe and protected? We don't.

Advertisement

Sadly, yes.

'Informed' indeed.

Because they don't care about being trusted.

They have the power. That's all they care about.

Lots of people used Orwell as an instruction manual, unfortunately.

That's how you end up in federal prison for a long time.

Advertisement

We'd advise against this, but it happens all the time.

SCOTUS declining to take up the case leaves Twitter/X stuck withholding this information, unfortunately. Maybe things will change down the road. But we wouldn't hold our breath.

***
Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth. Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement