Columbia Says It Won't Be Calling the NYPD to Handle Campus Protests Again
Sanctimonious Gavin Newsom Tries to Join in on Noem Ridicule but Gets Promptly...
Dana Loesch Asks Who Was Worse: Jimmy Carter or Joe Biden?
NBC News: White House Planning to Limit Biden's and Harris' Commencement Appearances
Gov. Kristie Noem Says to Preorder Her Book Where She Recounts Shooting Her...
LOL at Arizona State University Lawbreakers: Why Are the Police Letting Frat Boys...
President Biden Blasts 'Hateful Rhetoric' From Pro-Israel Demonstrators at Columbia
Alarming: Fire Marshal Jamaal Bowman Hilariously Duped by Pro-Hamas Twitter Parody Account
'Absolutely Incredible!' Julie Kelly Shares Unsealed Detail From Trump 'Classified Doc' Ca...
President Joe Biden Promises He Will Not Rest Until All American Hostages Are...
Trump-Hating Psychiatrist Proves She Needs a Civics Course While Opining About SCOTUS
Kristi Noem Needs More Courageous Advisers
WHOOPSIES: Emory University Professor Who Was Tackled by Police Confesses to Assaulting Of...
Biden Sees Economy 'Through the Eyes of Scranton and Working People' (Not THESE...
Russel Brand: From Raunchy to Redeemed

Jemele Hill invokes Martin Luther King Jr. to shame 'White moderate' Mitt Romney over SCOTUS

It’s a dark day for the Resistance, thanks to GOP Sen. Mitt Romney’s commitment to proceeding with the process to replace the late SCOTUS Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

Advertisement

We’ve documented quite a few angry reactions already (and there are plenty more where those came from), but this one from Atlantic contributing writer Jemele Hill deserves its own post because, well, it’s just so predictably awful:

Jemele’s tweet is special because, while she uses it to register her general disgust with Romney’s belief in adhering to constitutionally defined procedures, it also brings in both the patriarchy and racism. And invokes Martin Luther King Jr.! That’s truly impressive.

For those who are wondering, here’s what Martin Luther King Jr. wrote in his “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”:

I must make two honest confessions to you, my Christian and Jewish brothers. First, I must confess that over the past few years I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to “order” than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: “I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action”; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a “more convenient season.” Shallow understanding from people of good will is more frustrating than absolute misunderstanding from people of ill will. Lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that law and order exist for the purpose of establishing justice and that when they fail in this purpose they become the dangerously structured dams that block the flow of social progress. I had hoped that the white moderate would understand that the present tension in the South is a necessary phase of the transition from an obnoxious negative peace, in which the Negro passively accepted his unjust plight, to a substantive and positive peace, in which all men will respect the dignity and worth of human personality. Actually, we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive. We bring it out in the open, where it can be seen and dealt with. Like a boil that can never be cured so long as it is covered up but must be opened with all its ugliness to the natural medicines of air and light, injustice must be exposed, with all the tension its exposure creates, to the light of human conscience and the air of national opinion before it can be cured.

Advertisement

And Jemele Hill is using what Civil Rights hero Martin Luther King Jr. — who had some legitimate bones to pick — wrote in 1963 to demonstrate that Mitt Romney doesn’t care about black people, despite having zero evidence to support that assertion.

So, in other words, it’s completely on-brand for Jemele Hill.

Just like ignoring the parts of MLK Jr.’s legacy that don’t support her narrative:

Advertisement

Why would she? The Twitter market for crazy is second to none. And Jemele Hill is one of the best salespeople out there.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement