Old Audio Casts Doubts on Abdul El-Sayed’s Claim He Never Called to Defund...
Pearl-Clutching Grifters: Bulwark's Fake Platner Skepticism Exposed
Politico Correspondent Clarifies How Graham Platner Is Not ‘DSA-Backed’
After Latest Platner Scandal, Bill Kristol Notes the GOP Nominated Ken Paxton
Hot Take: If Platner Was Blackout Drunk, How Do We Know She Didn’t...
Sunny Hostin’s 'Vote Blue No Matter Who' Brain Rot: Ride or Die for...
NYT Columnist Charles Blow Defends Platner Staying in the Race, Citing Donald Trump,...
Jill Filipovic Praises Dems for Discovering Sex Pests Are Bad — Just as...
‘I Believe Jenny’: MN Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan Now Believes a Woman
Dulling Her Sparkle: Congressman to File Articles of Impeachment Against Biden Activist Ju...
Graham Platner Superfan Bernie Sanders Recommends He Step Aside in Tear-Stained Post
'Florida Dodged a Bullet': Ex-Gov Dem Nominee Andrew Gillum Busted Last Night in...
Graham Platner's World Just Came Crashing Down
'Impressed by His Political Charisma' — Michelle Goldberg, Just Before Platner's Rape Alle...
The Bulwark's Sarah Longwell Says the Quiet Part Out Loud About Democrats and...

USA Today deletes tweet and edits disgusting hit on Brett Kavanaugh (backlash only intensifies)

Friday night we told you about an article in USA Today’s sports section that was nothing short of a disgusting smear on Brett Kavanaugh. After nearly a full day, the backlash was so great that the USA Today obviously felt like a major backpedal was in order:

Advertisement

This was the original tweet containing a photo and quote from the article that earned a ratio of epic proportions:

null

The tweet has been deleted and the content changed, as USA Today noted with this addition that now precedes the article:

Editor’s note: Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh has told members of the Senate Judiciary Committee he loves coaching his daughters’ girls basketball teams, but said in testimony Thursday “thanks to what some of you on this side of the committee have unleashed, I may never be able to coach again.” The intent of this commentary was to address that question. The column was re-edited to more closely reflect that intent and labeled to reflect it as the writer’s opinion.

Many remain not so forgiving:

Advertisement

Yes, the original version seemed to better display the actual intent of the article, and everybody knows it.

Advertisement

Maybe USA Today should have considered not publishing the thing in the first place.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement