Rep. Jason Crow Says ICE Agents Are Parading Around in Commando Cosplay
NYC Mayor Mamdani's Excuse for 'Photo ID to Shovel Snow' Hypocrisy Is OFF...
Rep. Ilhan Omar's SOTU Guest Is Activist Who Went Viral for Being Dragged...
Officer Who Arrested Laken Riley's Killer Speaks at White House Event Honoring Angel...
Member of Parliament Especially Concerned for 2SLGBTQIA+ Canadians in Puerto Vallarta
From Booing Anthems to Cuddly Consolation Prizes: Canada's Stuffed Animal Walk of Shame...
Woman Never Wants to Do Anything for a Man Again After Hockey Team...
From Biden Blind Spot to Trump Hand Obsession: Aaron Rupar's Selective Medical Expertise
Keith Olbermann: US Men’s Hockey Team Are ‘Self-Absorbed Scumbag Misogynists’
Libs Are Losing It After Seeing Kash Patel Celebrating The Olympic Gold
Gavin Newsom Just Sounded Incredibly Racist While Promoting His New Book
Don't Miss Our MASSIVE State of the Union VIP Sale
GOBSMACKED! WATCH Bill Maher's Face As He Learns How UNPOPULAR Pete Buttigieg Is...
The Dems Remain Perplexed and Clueless About How They've Lost Male Voters in...
We've Seen MANY Posts Backfire Over The Years but THIS Anti-Trump List Post...

Three Is a Tragic Number: WSJ Hits Bottom With ‘Throuple Trouble’ Interior Design Article

ImgFlip

There’s not just a couple of things amiss with the latest edition of The Wall Street Journal; there’s a throuple. What’s a throuple? We think you can figure that out. Former WSJ readers say the challenges of being in a household where the bathroom towels read ‘his, his, and his’ is not something they can relate to or want to read about.

Advertisement

Have a look. (READ)

This is not your dad’s WSJ, but the paper’s editor wants it to be someone’s tri-dads’ WSJ in the future.

Commenters say they don’t understand how three guys who all dress the same can’t agree on a vanilla box.

Silly, that's the next issue.

Older folks will remember Barbara Mandrell’s ‘Sleeping Single in a Double Bed.’ These guys had to contend with sleeping triple in a double bed. Interior designer to the rescue!

So, one top and two bottoms.

Posters are wondering about future follow-up stories for the WSJ.

Advertisement

He knows how to curry favor.

After seeing the post, commenters were looking for help from the heavens. 

We welcome the sweet meteor of death.

Posters see that contentious vanilla box breaking up the trio. Is a divorce… er, trivorce around the corner?

This is relatable for other three-income homes. So, not very relatable at all.

Advertisement

Posters say this triple feature spells the end of serious journalism at the WSJ.

I remember when the WSJ moved markets.

We used to refresh it for trades, not takes on throuples arguing over throw pillows.

Three “tastes” coexist until someone steals the covers or the remote. Groundbreaking stuff.

The real story isn’t the moody den, it’s a serious paper-chasing lifestyle clicks.

No wonder subscribers are leaving faster than commitment in that household.

Back to finance, please.

This isn’t journalism evolving, it’s journalism surrendering.

— D. (@dxebco) December 19, 2025

You know the WSJ editorial team sees this article as a good thing. Before you know it, they’ll feature it in an ad for 33% off the cover price.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code MERRY74 to get 74% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement