A ‘Scared’ Jonah Goldberg Unloads on ‘Poseur’ Hasan Piker
Federal Judge Again Blocks Trump Administration From Ending TPS for Somalis
What’s Up Dox?: Scott Galloway Is Mad Mamdani Painted a Target on Him...
Not-a-Communist Melat Kiros Notes Some Big-Tent Democrats Call Themselves Capitalists
Friendship of Fools: Chris Cuomo Defends His Good Pal Fauci After Silent COVID...
Relish the Thought: FCC Chairman Points Out Legacy Media Is Less Trusted Than...
Scott Jennings Shares Three Reasons GOP Could Survive the Midterms Despite Bungling Trump’...
Rand Paul Takes a Stroll Down Memory Lane With an Enraging Fauci vs....
Kamala Harris Just Made It Obvious the Dems Know They Can't Win on...
GOP Candidate for WI Gov Promises Not to Cancel Thanksgiving, Unlike His Unhinged...
'Medic!' US Oil and Gas Assn Lights Up Noted Energy Expert and Trump/Big...
RATIO ALERT: John Thune Gets WALLOPED on X for Posting About Anything but...
Senator and Ratio Machine Sheldon Whitehouse's Attempt to Make ICE Racist Blows Up...
WEAK: In Response to Sophie Cunningham's Common Sense, Her Coach Mimics Ketanji Brown...
Fauci Takes the Fifth 111 Times While Tillis and Cornyn Betray Trump

Three Is a Tragic Number: WSJ Hits Bottom With ‘Throuple Trouble’ Interior Design Article

ImgFlip

There’s not just a couple of things amiss with the latest edition of The Wall Street Journal; there’s a throuple. What’s a throuple? We think you can figure that out. Former WSJ readers say the challenges of being in a household where the bathroom towels read ‘his, his, and his’ is not something they can relate to or want to read about.

Advertisement

Have a look. (READ)

This is not your dad’s WSJ, but the paper’s editor wants it to be someone’s tri-dads’ WSJ in the future.

Commenters say they don’t understand how three guys who all dress the same can’t agree on a vanilla box.

Silly, that's the next issue.

Older folks will remember Barbara Mandrell’s ‘Sleeping Single in a Double Bed.’ These guys had to contend with sleeping triple in a double bed. Interior designer to the rescue!

So, one top and two bottoms.

Posters are wondering about future follow-up stories for the WSJ.

Advertisement

He knows how to curry favor.

After seeing the post, commenters were looking for help from the heavens. 

We welcome the sweet meteor of death.

Posters see that contentious vanilla box breaking up the trio. Is a divorce… er, trivorce around the corner?

This is relatable for other three-income homes. So, not very relatable at all.

Advertisement

Posters say this triple feature spells the end of serious journalism at the WSJ.

I remember when the WSJ moved markets.

We used to refresh it for trades, not takes on throuples arguing over throw pillows.

Three “tastes” coexist until someone steals the covers or the remote. Groundbreaking stuff.

The real story isn’t the moody den, it’s a serious paper-chasing lifestyle clicks.

No wonder subscribers are leaving faster than commitment in that household.

Back to finance, please.

This isn’t journalism evolving, it’s journalism surrendering.

— D. (@dxebco) December 19, 2025

You know the WSJ editorial team sees this article as a good thing. Before you know it, they’ll feature it in an ad for 33% off the cover price.

Editor’s Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting that takes on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.

Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code MERRY74 to get 74% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement