In his quest to stall the vote on President Donald Trump’s 'Big Beautiful Bill,' Senator Chuck Schumer insisted that the bill be read in the Senate in its entirety. So, the political party that can’t tell the difference between a pickle and a doughnut had to hear the definition of 'Woman' in the bill.
It was surreal and funny, but now they can’t pretend not to know what a woman is. (WATCH)
Thanks to Chuck Schumer, Democrats were forced to read the definition of a WOMAN included in the Big Beautiful Bill. 😂😭😂
— I Meme Therefore I Am 🇺🇸 (@ImMeme0) June 29, 2025
pic.twitter.com/cSM6XTIZ09
It’s crazy that the definition of a man & a woman is necessary to be part of the BBB but crazy times call for truth to be codified.
— Stubborn🔥German🇩🇪Lady💃 (@jenhoog) June 29, 2025
And we even have to have that in a bill…astonishing at how we have to protect women from the left.
— Susan Wilson (@susanwilsonc70) June 29, 2025
Common sense has to be codified because it’s so uncommon amongst Democrats.
Here’s the text that was read. We see no ambiguity here. Commenters say this needs to be shared with a certain someone on the Supreme Court.
‘‘(A) FEMALE.—The term ‘female’ means an individual who naturally has, had, will have, or would have, but for a developmental or genetic anomaly or historical accident, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports, and utilizes eggs for fertilization.7
‘‘(B) MALE.—The term ‘male’ means an individual who naturally has, had, will have, or would have, but for a developmental or genetic anomaly or historical accident, the reproductive system that at some point produces, transports, and utilizes sperm for fertilization.’’.
— AZ Andersons (@az_andersons) June 29, 2025
Some tell Marxist Kenaji Brown.
— Employee Wellness Newsletters (@HRnewsletters) June 29, 2025
Can someone share this with Ketanji Jackson? She was confused about this 😂😂
— DogPooX (@DogPooX) June 29, 2025
— WhatDidYouSay (@NoFilterMeSorry) June 29, 2025
And now they know what a woman is! 🤣
— Chris L (@Chitownclear) June 29, 2025
😅 welp now that we have cleared that up. We can all move forward.
— Tabby (@TabbyyOwens) June 29, 2025
You would hope so! But Democrats are stubborn creatures when confronted with the truth.
Recommended
Although it was a stalling tactic, many posters agree that ALL bills should be read aloud before being voted on.
I think it’s awesome they’re reading the bill in its entirety.
— Mrs. Right (@Islandcrybaby) June 29, 2025
Honestly, every bill should be read aloud.
— Elon Made Me Join (@ElonJoin839) June 29, 2025
Then, there’s no hiding pet projects or shenanigans.
I think it should be a constitutional requirement that any bill must be read in full on the house and senate floors- and if you arent at the reading, you cant vote on the bill.
— Emilia Henderson (@Emilia__writes) June 29, 2025
We like that last requirement. Although an exception would probably need to be carved out for the Vice President when it comes to Senate tie-breaking votes.
