While James Talarico Courts Texas Christians, His Church Library Grooms With Pornographic...
Anti-ICE Deadbeats Digging Up Blocks to Build a Wall Sums Up These Agitating...
Leftists: 'James Talarico Went to Seminary!' Christians: 'Yeah, and Judas Was a Disciple'
'Principles? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Principles': Bulwark Crew Embraces Nazis for the...
Chuck Todd Tells Us Trump's a Noisy but Not Active President (Remember What...
The Democrat Big Tent Just Got Bigger: Nazi Tattoos, Fake Doctors, and Now...
Twitch Tantrum: Hasan Piker Brands Fox News Researchers 'Stalkers' for Tuning Into His...
Chris Murphy Went on The View to Again Make It Clear Who He's...
Jaxson Overreaction: The View’s Sunny Hostin Says NFL Star’s Trump Intro Felt Like...
Scott Jennings Reminds Dems on CNN That James Talarico’s Bizarre Beliefs Clash With...
Iran Steals California's Playbook: Strait of Hormuz Tolls Renamed 'Environmental Fees'
Dem Joe Cunningham Says His Party Needs to Talk Less Like Professors and...
Oregon Petition to Ban Hunting and Fishing Reaches Threshold to Be Added to...
‘The Terrorists Are in Control’: Protesters Set Up Barricades Outside ICE Facility
Mark Zaid Honored to Represent Estate of Officer Brian Sicknick in Lawsuit Against...

Atlantic magazine investigates genetic component of sexual orientation

By polling ‘sexologists’:

The media has tended to broadcast the news that gay-identified men and straight-identified men have quite discernible arousal patterns when they are shown various kinds of sexual stimuli. And that’s true. But if you look closely at the data, you’ll see that most straight-identified men do tend to show a little bit of arousal across sex categories (as do gay-identified men).

Developmental studies by researchers like the University of Utah’s Lisa Diamond suggest that women may demonstrate a fair bit of flexibility over the course of their lives in terms of their sexual attractions, relations, and identities, and laboratory studies by people like Chivers and Bailey seem to back up the hypothesis that females are, on average, less rigidly oriented when it comes to sex. At least when you measure their vaginal response, straight-identified women can be aroused by a wide variety of sexual stimuli.

Nevertheless, let’s just say, for purposes of argument, that we’re willing to accept the existence of some straight females and males as defined above, even if they are not always perfectly straight arrows in the lab. Were they born that way?

Advertisement

We ourselves profess a certain knowledge of passing acquaintance with sex, but . . .

Clinical Medical Humanities? We don’t recall our college having any such department.

Go there and sample the wonders of wisdom offered by polled sexologists on this breaking story, including this earth-shattering finale:

Finally, a related question: Given that we don’t know if they are really all “born that way,” should straight-identified people be allowed to marry?

Personally, I think it makes sense to let straight-identified people marry, not because they were necessarily born that way, but because it seems silly, in this day and age, to get in the way of their desire to marry and/or to have sex with whatever consenting adults they wish. Given the challenges of attempting a lifetime partnership with a person who will be, on average, fundamentally sexually different from oneself, it seems the least we can do for straight people is to let them get married if they want.

Caution: references “penis obliteration.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement