YIKES: Francesca Hong's Clapback at David Axelrod's 'Faculty Lounge Exotica' Dig Takes AWK...
That Emoji... LOL! Mehdi Hasan Learns the HARD WAY Not to Pick a...
OOF! Not Sure Chuck Schumer Can Come Back From WHOOPIN' Doug Burgum Just...
Iranian Woman Explains What Abdul El-Sayed REALLY Means When He Claims He Cares...
Leftist Media Darling Krystal Ball Cheers Rise of Anti-Semitic Socialists in the Democrat...
WILL Creep You Out! Guess WHY Debbie Dingall Supports Hasan Piker (Even If...
Allahu Akbar! Ben Rhodes Writes Check His Hamas-Loving Butt Can't Cash in DIG...
REALLY!? Bernie Sanders Says No Serious Lefties Running for Office Have Called to...
Can't EVEN Make This UP: Thomas Massie Blames Expensive Burritos on the Jews...
A Dox on Your House!: Scott Galloway Still Coping Over Being on Mamdani’s...
This Eye-Opening Poll of Latino Voters Should Be a Wake-Up Call for Republicans
Tanked by Thanksgiving?: David Axelrod Says Voters Will Reject Francesca Hong Over Her...
Dem House Candidate Will Lawrence Says He Let DSA Membership Lapse for Sake...
Case Against Teen Rapist Dismissed After He Completes 'Youthful Offender' Rehab Plan
Dem Wisconsin Governor Hopefuls David Crowley and Francesca Hong Battle for Biggest Victim

Atlantic magazine investigates genetic component of sexual orientation

By polling ‘sexologists’:

The media has tended to broadcast the news that gay-identified men and straight-identified men have quite discernible arousal patterns when they are shown various kinds of sexual stimuli. And that’s true. But if you look closely at the data, you’ll see that most straight-identified men do tend to show a little bit of arousal across sex categories (as do gay-identified men).

Developmental studies by researchers like the University of Utah’s Lisa Diamond suggest that women may demonstrate a fair bit of flexibility over the course of their lives in terms of their sexual attractions, relations, and identities, and laboratory studies by people like Chivers and Bailey seem to back up the hypothesis that females are, on average, less rigidly oriented when it comes to sex. At least when you measure their vaginal response, straight-identified women can be aroused by a wide variety of sexual stimuli.

Nevertheless, let’s just say, for purposes of argument, that we’re willing to accept the existence of some straight females and males as defined above, even if they are not always perfectly straight arrows in the lab. Were they born that way?

Advertisement

We ourselves profess a certain knowledge of passing acquaintance with sex, but . . .

Clinical Medical Humanities? We don’t recall our college having any such department.

Go there and sample the wonders of wisdom offered by polled sexologists on this breaking story, including this earth-shattering finale:

Finally, a related question: Given that we don’t know if they are really all “born that way,” should straight-identified people be allowed to marry?

Personally, I think it makes sense to let straight-identified people marry, not because they were necessarily born that way, but because it seems silly, in this day and age, to get in the way of their desire to marry and/or to have sex with whatever consenting adults they wish. Given the challenges of attempting a lifetime partnership with a person who will be, on average, fundamentally sexually different from oneself, it seems the least we can do for straight people is to let them get married if they want.

Caution: references “penis obliteration.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement