The Two Jakes: Tapper Finally Mentions the Fauci Diary on CNN but Not...
Chris Rufo Exposes California Program That Gives Taxpayer-Funded Meth Pipes to the Homeles...
Scold News: Five Years Ago, Fauci Chum Chuck Todd Was Lecturing the Vaccine-Hesitant...
James Carville Says Fauci Is an Honest Guy Who Made No Mistakes and...
John Cleese Says He’s Being ‘Ritually Humiliated’ as a Racist for Supporting Rupert...
Toy Box Doc: Brandon Gill Asks X If James Talarico Still Plays With...
Gov. Tim Walz of All People Tells Elon Musk, ‘See You in Court,...
Agitators in Madison Use Boards With Nails to Defend Their BLM Encampment, and...
Fully Vaxxed. Promised Protection, And Still They’re Rewriting What Fauci, Biden & the...
Rolling Stone: We’re No Closer to Getting to the Origin of the COVID...
Good Question: Will NYC Residents Need to Show ID to Shop at City-Run...
TMZ’s Harvey Levin Calls Fauci Attacks ‘Heartbreaking,’ McCarthy-Like
David Axelrod Races to Defend Fauci After He Pleads the Fifth on Everything—Even...
Dem Sen. Andy Kim Feting Dr. Fauci Was a Deranged Political Version of...
Bulwark's Correspondent Confirms MS NOW's Theory That Fauci Hearing Was a Show Trial

Atlantic magazine investigates genetic component of sexual orientation

By polling ‘sexologists’:

The media has tended to broadcast the news that gay-identified men and straight-identified men have quite discernible arousal patterns when they are shown various kinds of sexual stimuli. And that’s true. But if you look closely at the data, you’ll see that most straight-identified men do tend to show a little bit of arousal across sex categories (as do gay-identified men).

Developmental studies by researchers like the University of Utah’s Lisa Diamond suggest that women may demonstrate a fair bit of flexibility over the course of their lives in terms of their sexual attractions, relations, and identities, and laboratory studies by people like Chivers and Bailey seem to back up the hypothesis that females are, on average, less rigidly oriented when it comes to sex. At least when you measure their vaginal response, straight-identified women can be aroused by a wide variety of sexual stimuli.

Nevertheless, let’s just say, for purposes of argument, that we’re willing to accept the existence of some straight females and males as defined above, even if they are not always perfectly straight arrows in the lab. Were they born that way?

Advertisement

We ourselves profess a certain knowledge of passing acquaintance with sex, but . . .

Clinical Medical Humanities? We don’t recall our college having any such department.

Go there and sample the wonders of wisdom offered by polled sexologists on this breaking story, including this earth-shattering finale:

Finally, a related question: Given that we don’t know if they are really all “born that way,” should straight-identified people be allowed to marry?

Personally, I think it makes sense to let straight-identified people marry, not because they were necessarily born that way, but because it seems silly, in this day and age, to get in the way of their desire to marry and/or to have sex with whatever consenting adults they wish. Given the challenges of attempting a lifetime partnership with a person who will be, on average, fundamentally sexually different from oneself, it seems the least we can do for straight people is to let them get married if they want.

Caution: references “penis obliteration.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement