Democrat Operatives Now Very Concerned With Fiscal Responsibility
CNN’s Abby Phillip Issues On-Air Correction to Lie That Suspected Terrorists Targeted NYC...
UK Teachers Told Students’ Drawings Could Be Blasphemous Under Islamic Law
Even Chicago Tribune Questions Story of Citizen Who Says ICE Detained Her for...
James Talarico: Fascism Will Come Draped in the (Trans) Flag and Carrying the...
Hilarious Parody CPAC Line Up Revealed
Olivia Julianna: America Literally Became a Country Because a Bunch of Men Signed...
Chile Chooses God and Family: Pro-Life Dad of 9 José Antonio Kast Takes...
Swalwell: All Ears for Optics, Deaf to Waste – Flies South for Clicks...
Another CNN Reporter Walks Back Post Implying That Mamdani Was the Target of...
Molly Jong-Fast Raked for Complaining About ‘Astronomical Amount’ Spent on Shellfish for T...
Human Springboard for IED-Throwing Terrorist Spends His 15 Minutes Talking About White Sup...
Adam Schiff's Attempt to Shame Pete Hegseth's 'Waste of Taxpayer Dollars' Via a...
ANOTHER Chuck Schumer Flashback Has Aged Wonderfully (THIS One Is Slamming Obama's Disastr...
Winston Churchill to Be Replaced on UK Banknotes With a Hedgehog or Badger

Atlantic magazine investigates genetic component of sexual orientation

By polling ‘sexologists’:

The media has tended to broadcast the news that gay-identified men and straight-identified men have quite discernible arousal patterns when they are shown various kinds of sexual stimuli. And that’s true. But if you look closely at the data, you’ll see that most straight-identified men do tend to show a little bit of arousal across sex categories (as do gay-identified men).

Developmental studies by researchers like the University of Utah’s Lisa Diamond suggest that women may demonstrate a fair bit of flexibility over the course of their lives in terms of their sexual attractions, relations, and identities, and laboratory studies by people like Chivers and Bailey seem to back up the hypothesis that females are, on average, less rigidly oriented when it comes to sex. At least when you measure their vaginal response, straight-identified women can be aroused by a wide variety of sexual stimuli.

Nevertheless, let’s just say, for purposes of argument, that we’re willing to accept the existence of some straight females and males as defined above, even if they are not always perfectly straight arrows in the lab. Were they born that way?

Advertisement

We ourselves profess a certain knowledge of passing acquaintance with sex, but . . .

Clinical Medical Humanities? We don’t recall our college having any such department.

Go there and sample the wonders of wisdom offered by polled sexologists on this breaking story, including this earth-shattering finale:

Finally, a related question: Given that we don’t know if they are really all “born that way,” should straight-identified people be allowed to marry?

Personally, I think it makes sense to let straight-identified people marry, not because they were necessarily born that way, but because it seems silly, in this day and age, to get in the way of their desire to marry and/or to have sex with whatever consenting adults they wish. Given the challenges of attempting a lifetime partnership with a person who will be, on average, fundamentally sexually different from oneself, it seems the least we can do for straight people is to let them get married if they want.

Caution: references “penis obliteration.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement