So Much for That Whole 'Republican Strategist Lie': Never Trumper Sarah Longwell FINALLY...
Ted Lieu Mocking Trump for Speaking at Ohio HS Gym Inspires X to...
Ntl School Board Assn., DOJ, and Biden WH Officials Worked Hand-In-Hand to Target...
AWKWARD: VA Democrat Elaine Luria FREEZES When Asked Why She LOST to Jen...
NEWLY Declassified Docs Show Jack Smith Was Up to Absolutely NO GOOD Spying...
Scott Jennings Made Jake Tapper Look Stupid and It Was GLORIOUS (That's It,...
SLAAAY QUEEN: Roseanne Points Out There's NOTHING Democratic About Dems and Bill Maher...
Have You MET Your Son? Tim Kaine Shaming Trump for Not Being a...
Monday Morning Meme Madness
Vulnerable Votes: Hulk Actor Mark Ruffalo Says Elon Musk Could Rig the Midterm...
NYTimes’ ‘Journo’ Michelle Cottle and ‘Republican’ Chris Christie Try Pinning Cornell Case...
The Lie That Snagged Me: Wealthy ‘Austin Powers’ Actor Mike Myers Loves Socialism...
'Argo F**k Yourself:' Iranian Director Criticizes Classic Movie for the Dumbest Reason Pos...
Message on Jack Smith's Shirt at 'Power to the People' Concert Confirms Partisan...
Pucker Up: Amy Klobuchar Disrespects the American Flag While Kissing Up to Somalis...

Atlantic magazine investigates genetic component of sexual orientation

By polling ‘sexologists’:

The media has tended to broadcast the news that gay-identified men and straight-identified men have quite discernible arousal patterns when they are shown various kinds of sexual stimuli. And that’s true. But if you look closely at the data, you’ll see that most straight-identified men do tend to show a little bit of arousal across sex categories (as do gay-identified men).

Developmental studies by researchers like the University of Utah’s Lisa Diamond suggest that women may demonstrate a fair bit of flexibility over the course of their lives in terms of their sexual attractions, relations, and identities, and laboratory studies by people like Chivers and Bailey seem to back up the hypothesis that females are, on average, less rigidly oriented when it comes to sex. At least when you measure their vaginal response, straight-identified women can be aroused by a wide variety of sexual stimuli.

Nevertheless, let’s just say, for purposes of argument, that we’re willing to accept the existence of some straight females and males as defined above, even if they are not always perfectly straight arrows in the lab. Were they born that way?

Advertisement

We ourselves profess a certain knowledge of passing acquaintance with sex, but . . .

Clinical Medical Humanities? We don’t recall our college having any such department.

Go there and sample the wonders of wisdom offered by polled sexologists on this breaking story, including this earth-shattering finale:

Finally, a related question: Given that we don’t know if they are really all “born that way,” should straight-identified people be allowed to marry?

Personally, I think it makes sense to let straight-identified people marry, not because they were necessarily born that way, but because it seems silly, in this day and age, to get in the way of their desire to marry and/or to have sex with whatever consenting adults they wish. Given the challenges of attempting a lifetime partnership with a person who will be, on average, fundamentally sexually different from oneself, it seems the least we can do for straight people is to let them get married if they want.

Caution: references “penis obliteration.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement