Katie Bar the Door: AZ Gov. Hobbs Dodges Question About Ruben Gallego’s Eric...
Property Punishment: Mayor Zohran Mamdani Is Giddy Over Plan to Tax the Homes...
David Axelrod: 'Americans Didn't Like This War From the Start'
OOF! Hunger Strike Hero Greg Casar Tried Taking on RFK Jr., and That...
Oklahoma City Bombing Remembered 31 Years Later
IRONY! After Smearing Kash Patel, The Atlantic Announces That We Live in Nazi-Occupied...
Sen. Mike Lee Cites Poll About Voting Identification
Media Photographer's Awkward Trump Pic Kind of Makes Trump Look Awesome
OOPS: Tim Kaine ACCIDENTALLY Explains WHY Virginia Redistricting Is WRONG and Unfair While...
Bill Maher Takes Former Biden Lackey to the Cleaners in FIERY Debate About...
WHOA: TMZ Actually MOCKS Ilhan Omar's Claim That OOPSIE Her Accountant Made Her...
Kamala Harris Throws Epic Tantrum Over Trump’s Iran Stance – Trips Over HERSELF...
OJ- REALLY?! Former Obama Adviser LOCKS DOWN After Making Violently RACIST Comments About...
Since We ALREADY Know About Swalwell, NOW POLITICO Can Share Deep-Dive They Could've...
SHOCKA! Atlantic 'Journo' Behind HOAX-Y Hit Piece on Kash Patel Has History of...

Atlantic magazine investigates genetic component of sexual orientation

By polling ‘sexologists’:

The media has tended to broadcast the news that gay-identified men and straight-identified men have quite discernible arousal patterns when they are shown various kinds of sexual stimuli. And that’s true. But if you look closely at the data, you’ll see that most straight-identified men do tend to show a little bit of arousal across sex categories (as do gay-identified men).

Developmental studies by researchers like the University of Utah’s Lisa Diamond suggest that women may demonstrate a fair bit of flexibility over the course of their lives in terms of their sexual attractions, relations, and identities, and laboratory studies by people like Chivers and Bailey seem to back up the hypothesis that females are, on average, less rigidly oriented when it comes to sex. At least when you measure their vaginal response, straight-identified women can be aroused by a wide variety of sexual stimuli.

Nevertheless, let’s just say, for purposes of argument, that we’re willing to accept the existence of some straight females and males as defined above, even if they are not always perfectly straight arrows in the lab. Were they born that way?

Advertisement

We ourselves profess a certain knowledge of passing acquaintance with sex, but . . .

Clinical Medical Humanities? We don’t recall our college having any such department.

Go there and sample the wonders of wisdom offered by polled sexologists on this breaking story, including this earth-shattering finale:

Finally, a related question: Given that we don’t know if they are really all “born that way,” should straight-identified people be allowed to marry?

Personally, I think it makes sense to let straight-identified people marry, not because they were necessarily born that way, but because it seems silly, in this day and age, to get in the way of their desire to marry and/or to have sex with whatever consenting adults they wish. Given the challenges of attempting a lifetime partnership with a person who will be, on average, fundamentally sexually different from oneself, it seems the least we can do for straight people is to let them get married if they want.

Caution: references “penis obliteration.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement