The tweet above is from the New York Times’ lead technology columnist, Nick Bilton. He posted it at 10:30 pm last night
It was followed this morning by this tweet from New York Times writer (and former executive editor) Bill Keller:
THERE IS A FAKE OP-ED GOING AROUND UNDER MY NAME, ABOUT WIKILEAKS. EMPHASIS ON "FAKE. "AS IN, NOT MINE.
— Bill Keller (@billkeller2014) July 29, 2012
Bilton is supposed to know something about the Internet. As one Twitter user pointed out, the hoax op-ed piece was not posted on the New York Times’ domain (nytimes.com). It’s a significant oversight on the part of Bilton:
https://twitter.com/csoghoian/status/229560644851081216
If it’s any consolation to Bilton, he wasn’t the only prominent journalist who got snookered:
https://twitter.com/dangillmor/status/229445612922368001
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/229537647117361152
A lot of people who fell for the hoax are feeling a bit embarrassed this morning:
Well, I was taken in by the fake Keller Wikileaks op-ed – and I see I wasn't alone! I did wonder about "government checks and balances" tho
— Tom Watson (@tomwatson) July 29, 2012
Oh fuck me, the Keller op-ed is fake?
— Doug Lucas (@DouglasLucas) July 29, 2012
Then again, maybe it’s one of those “fake but accurate” things?
https://twitter.com/m_cetera/status/229546300302041088
interesting — whoever wrote that fake op-ed allegedly by @nytkeller used a couple of chunks from his email to me: http://t.co/qjjRuKu3
— Mathew Ingram (@mathewi) July 29, 2012
How long has this been in the works?
https://twitter.com/csoghoian/status/229575068164972546
Updates: Bilton has deleted the tweet in which he publicized the hoax op-ed. Here is his tweet announcing the deletion:
https://twitter.com/nickbilton/status/229575645997441024
Of course, this makes no sense. (Ed. note: Actually, it does make sense. See our updates below.) The tweet that Bilton deleted this morning was sent by Bilton from his (Bilton’s) own account, not someone else’s. What “fake Bill Keller account” is Bilton referring to?
Is Bilton saying that he was unable to distinguish between Bill Keller’s real Twitter account and a fake one?
On a related note, something funny may be going on with Keller’s (real) Twitter account.
For one thing, at around 10 am eastern time, Keller claimed to be an expert on dressage:
That tweet has been deleted.
Also, at about 9:30 am eastern time Keller retweeted the hoax op-ed:
It’s possible Keller was just trying to call attention to the hoax op-ed in order to debunk it. But is also seems possible that someone else has gained access to Keller’s account. Twitchy will continue to monitor the story and will update this post as more facts come in.
* * *
Mystery solved?
Re-reading Bilton’s tweet, above we see that he attributed the op-ed hoax to @nytkeIler as opposed to @nytkeller. (Look closely. The first “l” in “keller” is a capital I.)
When we go to @nytkeIler, we get a “Sorry, that page doesn’t exist!” message. Perhaps the page was populated last night when Bilton published his tweet.
In any case, it appears that Bilton, the lead technology columnist for the New York Times, was unable to distinguish a fake Bill Keller Twitter account from the real one.
* * *
Bilton has provided more details, confirming what we wrote above:
https://twitter.com/nickbilton/status/229589400965758976
He elaborates on Flickr:
The account above looks real, right? Bill Keller’s name, photo and URL are all correct. Most importantly, his Twitter handle reads: @nytkeller.
Well, it turns out this is actually a fake Twitter account.
After suspecting something was off with the account — namely that it didn’t have a little blue “verified” symbol next to it and didn’t show an accurate follower count — I discovered that the two “ll”s in the Twitter handle were actually a capital “i” and lowercase “L.” So in Twitter’s app, it looks like a capital “ll” when in reality it spells his name with an “il.” I notified someone at Twitter late last night (see the timestamp of the screenshot) and asked if this was a Twitter bug, or a fake account and they said they would investigate. It turns out, it was the latter.
* * *
Bilton says he notified Twitter immediately of his concerns:
https://twitter.com/nickbilton/status/229590163494424577
Why, then, didn’t he post anything to Twitter? He left up the link to the hoax op-ed for about eight hours. We asked Bilton and to his credit he replied:
https://twitter.com/nickbilton/status/229592587802144768
https://twitter.com/nickbilton/status/229592983455023104
Update:
WikiLeaks now claims credit for the hoax.
Yes. We admit it. WikiLeaks (Assange & co) and our great supporters where behind the successful NYTimes banking blockade hoax on @nytkeller.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) July 29, 2012
The Fake NY Times WikiLeaks Op-Ed That Fooled Pretty Much Everybody | Gizmodo http://t.co/TVjXa9F7 https://t.co/xWcNxCbG
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) July 29, 2012
Assange:"If the NYTimes cannot act with honnor to defend their 'sources' from economic censorship then we'll just have to do it for them :)"
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) July 29, 2012
What is not a hoax, is that WikiLeaks is under illegal economic censorship by US financial insitutions and NYTimes says nothing. The rats.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) July 29, 2012
Join the conversation as a VIP Member