BAHA! CA Dems' EPIC FAIL During Debate --> WATCH 'Em Flop on 'Truck...
VA Election Guy Lectures Virginians About Coming TOGETHER Because Polarization Is Bad and...
'Nice Try'! Paul Mauro Dismantles USA Today's Ridiculous (and Ratioed) Post Comparing FBI...
WHOA: DataRepublican Shares Data-Filled Post Showing DAMNING Irregularities in VA Gerryman...
Most of NYC's East Villagers Wanted Mamdani and Now They're Suing Him After...
Guy Benson Has Had ENOUGH, Shuts DOWN Every Single Lefty Toad INSISTING Dems...
THIS! Scott Jennings Goes OFF on Spanberger's Gerrymandering, Leaves CNN's Kasie Hunt Spee...
Berate and Debate: CA Gubernatorial Hopeful Katie Porter Claims She Apologized to Cussed...
Three Year Letterman Gives Props to Euroweenie Who'll Never Visit This Barbaric Country...
Clueless Columnist Asks If It’s Now a Crime to Expose White Supremacist Groups
Check Out the Twisted Wording of Virginia's Gerrymandering Referendum
Hasan Piker Joins the NYT to Talk About ‘Microlooting’ as Political Protest
Howard Kurtz: The Kash Patel ‘Scandal’ Would Have Been a Two-Day Story Had...
RFK Jr. Absolutely Torches Sen. Warnock: 'One Person Can Handle 1-3 Rabies Cases...
Here's a Classic Earth Day Flashback of Greg Gutfeld Giving Tugboat Phil a...

NYT left some pretty major details out of their coverage of girl who aborted, burned, and buried her baby

Various

As you unfortunately may have heard, Nebraska teen Celeste Burgess has been sentenced to 90 days in jail after pleading guilty to illegally concealing a dead human body, the dead human body of her third-trimester baby that she, with her mother's help, aborted, tried to burn, and repeatedly buried in April 2022. The details are incredibly grisly, although you'd never know it from this New York Times' tweet:

Advertisement

No mention in there of the fact that Burgess was in her third trimester and that the baby could have been viable. No mention of the fact that Burgess and her mother buried the body multiple times. No mention of their attempts to burn the baby. Those seem like pretty significant details that should've been included in the tweet, no?

And the headline isn't any better:

Yeah, let us find our shocked faces. We're sure they're around here somewhere ...

More like crafty. It's quite obvious what the New York Times is trying to do.

Advertisement

The New York Times is counting on outrage from pro-aborts who can't be bothered to actually click the link and read the article.

In what universe does that information not deserve to be front and center in the New York Times' — and any outlet's, for that matter — tweet about this story?

At this point, we're honestly not sure that the New York Times even knows what actual journalism is. Or, more likely, they know but just couldn't possibly care less.

Advertisement

Ridiculous and shameful and disgusting.

Sick.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement