Meltdown Mode: Dem Al Green Calls Sec. Mullin a Racist, Screams 'SHUT UP!'...
Pelley's Follow-Up Statement Digs the Grave of Entitled, Arrogant 'Journalism' Even Deeper
Big-Eared Dem Rep. Jacobs Tries to Roast Rubio's Shoes, Forgets She's a Mid...
OUCH! Dem Senator Did NOT Like Scott Bessent Spotlighting the Reason He's Slandering...
Let's Go Back Exactly 6 Years to When Health 'Experts' Decided to Torch...
Leftist YouTuber Adam Mockler Demands Ben Shapiro Be Sued for the 'Crime' of...
MSNOW Cuts Feed in Panic as Spencer Pratt Supporters Drop Unfiltered Truth Bombs
Dems Lecturing About Standards of Conduct Shift Into Stammer Overdrive When Asked About...
Terry Moran Crashes Out Defending Scott Pelley ... Demands Martyrdom for the Idiot...
Katie Porter's Campaign Gets Mashed — Stuck in Single Digits in a Brutal...
Nazi Platner Flees DC Fundraisers, Blames Big Bad Media at Family Home (After...
Scott Pelley's Departing Statement Contains the Most Cringe-Inducing Quote Ever From a Lib...
NJ Dems Just Chose an Al-Qaeda Volunteer Who Testified for the WTC Bomber...
A Glance at the People Most Upset CBS News Canned Scott Pelley Speaks...
Ripple Defect: Brian Stelter Says Scott Pelley’s CBS News Firing Is Like an...

NYT left some pretty major details out of their coverage of girl who aborted, burned, and buried her baby

Various

As you unfortunately may have heard, Nebraska teen Celeste Burgess has been sentenced to 90 days in jail after pleading guilty to illegally concealing a dead human body, the dead human body of her third-trimester baby that she, with her mother's help, aborted, tried to burn, and repeatedly buried in April 2022. The details are incredibly grisly, although you'd never know it from this New York Times' tweet:

Advertisement

No mention in there of the fact that Burgess was in her third trimester and that the baby could have been viable. No mention of the fact that Burgess and her mother buried the body multiple times. No mention of their attempts to burn the baby. Those seem like pretty significant details that should've been included in the tweet, no?

And the headline isn't any better:

Yeah, let us find our shocked faces. We're sure they're around here somewhere ...

More like crafty. It's quite obvious what the New York Times is trying to do.

Advertisement

The New York Times is counting on outrage from pro-aborts who can't be bothered to actually click the link and read the article.

In what universe does that information not deserve to be front and center in the New York Times' — and any outlet's, for that matter — tweet about this story?

At this point, we're honestly not sure that the New York Times even knows what actual journalism is. Or, more likely, they know but just couldn't possibly care less.

Advertisement

Ridiculous and shameful and disgusting.

Sick.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement