Ex NYC Mayor Eric Adams Interrupts the Mamdani Budget Celebration and Demonization of...
Schadenfreude-a-PALOOZA! Abigail Spanberger VETOS Collective Bargaining and HOOBOY, Their...
TOO Perfect! Group That Leaked Pete Buttigieg's Authenticity Coaching Video Just Made Thin...
Gavin Newsom's Attempted Mockery of Trump's Reflecting Pool Project Quickly Derailed and B...
AOC FAWNING All Over Zohran Mamdani's Socialist Budget MAGIC in NYC Runs Head...
Trump's in China but Still Managing to Cause Meltdowns on CNN Over His...
‘Journalistic’ Journey: Jim Acosta ‘Discovers’ Golden Statue of Trump at Florida Golf Cour...
Southern Specters: Dem Hakeem Jeffries Says the ‘Ghosts of the Confederacy’ Are Haunting...
Dems Angry at Trump for Calling Out ‘Journos’ for Dumb Questions, Biden Also...
Immigration Council Fellow: Those Margaritas Were Placed Before Sen. Van Hollen ‘With No...
Museum Exhibit Has AWFLs Put in Shackles by a Black Man Who Welcomes...
TMZ Poll About Spencer Pratt's Possibly Misleading Campaign Ad Is NOT Going the...
Law Prof: Trying to Spin the Russia Probe Into a Grand Conspiracy Is...
George Conway Just Said the Quiet Part Out Loud: Dems Have No Policies...
Karen Bass Worried She’s Being ‘Demonized’ in Spencer Pratt’s Violent and Hateful Ads

NYT left some pretty major details out of their coverage of girl who aborted, burned, and buried her baby

Various

As you unfortunately may have heard, Nebraska teen Celeste Burgess has been sentenced to 90 days in jail after pleading guilty to illegally concealing a dead human body, the dead human body of her third-trimester baby that she, with her mother's help, aborted, tried to burn, and repeatedly buried in April 2022. The details are incredibly grisly, although you'd never know it from this New York Times' tweet:

Advertisement

No mention in there of the fact that Burgess was in her third trimester and that the baby could have been viable. No mention of the fact that Burgess and her mother buried the body multiple times. No mention of their attempts to burn the baby. Those seem like pretty significant details that should've been included in the tweet, no?

And the headline isn't any better:

Yeah, let us find our shocked faces. We're sure they're around here somewhere ...

More like crafty. It's quite obvious what the New York Times is trying to do.

Advertisement

The New York Times is counting on outrage from pro-aborts who can't be bothered to actually click the link and read the article.

In what universe does that information not deserve to be front and center in the New York Times' — and any outlet's, for that matter — tweet about this story?

At this point, we're honestly not sure that the New York Times even knows what actual journalism is. Or, more likely, they know but just couldn't possibly care less.

Advertisement

Ridiculous and shameful and disgusting.

Sick.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos