BOO and YAH! Townhall Media Announces the One and ONLY Larry O’Connor As...
Cynical Publius 'Fixes' Brian Tyler Cohen's Virginia Dem Utopia Post With Savagely SPOT-ON...
Set Phasers to HA HA HA! William Shatner Teams UP with Stephen Miller...
OWNED! Former Reaganite KT McFarland Kindly Schools TF Out of Keith Olbermann After...
Word Warrior: Scott Jennings Scoffs at Cameron Kasky’s Language Limiting Edict on Saying...
CNN Anchor Wants Us to Focus on the Real Victims of Sunday’s MN...
Dem Podcaster Jennifer Welch Wants Her Team to Go After Jesse Watters and...
Upping the Rhetoric: Eric Holder Calls Trump a Dictator Clinging to Power With...
Co-Founder of Church Stormed by Don Lemon BODIES the Democrats
Jill Filipovic Appalled by Photo of ICE ‘Marching Half-Naked Elderly People Out Into...
MN Could End ICE Raids Tomorrow: Just Stop Harboring Criminal Illegals and Cooperate...
St. Paul Hotels Cancel Reservations Due to ‘Heightened Security Concerns’
Anti-ICE Activist Who Terrorized Kids in Church Is a Sitting Saint Paul School...
MN AG Ellison: Storming Churches ... Just 'Public Voice' – Because Laws Are...
Citizen Journalist Tries to Enroll His One-Year-Old in Somali Daycare; Threats Are Made

NYT left some pretty major details out of their coverage of girl who aborted, burned, and buried her baby

Various

As you unfortunately may have heard, Nebraska teen Celeste Burgess has been sentenced to 90 days in jail after pleading guilty to illegally concealing a dead human body, the dead human body of her third-trimester baby that she, with her mother's help, aborted, tried to burn, and repeatedly buried in April 2022. The details are incredibly grisly, although you'd never know it from this New York Times' tweet:

Advertisement

No mention in there of the fact that Burgess was in her third trimester and that the baby could have been viable. No mention of the fact that Burgess and her mother buried the body multiple times. No mention of their attempts to burn the baby. Those seem like pretty significant details that should've been included in the tweet, no?

And the headline isn't any better:

Yeah, let us find our shocked faces. We're sure they're around here somewhere ...

More like crafty. It's quite obvious what the New York Times is trying to do.

Advertisement

The New York Times is counting on outrage from pro-aborts who can't be bothered to actually click the link and read the article.

In what universe does that information not deserve to be front and center in the New York Times' — and any outlet's, for that matter — tweet about this story?

At this point, we're honestly not sure that the New York Times even knows what actual journalism is. Or, more likely, they know but just couldn't possibly care less.

Advertisement

Ridiculous and shameful and disgusting.

Sick.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos