KJP Dismisses State Dept. Spox As 'Random Person' to Avoid Crediting Trump for...
California Dreamin': How the Left Destroyed Life in the Golden State
Karine Jean-Pierre Ends Tenure as Mouthpiece for the King of Lies
CRY HARDER, Chucky! Schumer Warns Trump's Energy Secretary Is a Fossil Fuel Executive...
A Desperate Plea from a Fellow Mom of Redheads: Join Me in Praying...
Hits Us DIRECTLY in the Feels: Twitter User Shares Heartwarming Story About L.A....
Pam Bondi Tells Sen. Alex Padilla She Will Not Be Bullied by Him
Is the Pope Catholic? No, We're Really Asking: Check Out What Pope Francis...
'Is That a Joke?' Biden Asked If He or Trump Should Get Credit...
'Pure Savage!' GOP Rep Uses His Phone to Test Witness' Claim SSA Telework...
Ivy Beleaguered: J.D. Vance HUMILIATES Yale Professor Who Claims Pete Hegseth Will Destroy...
RFK Jr.'s Warning Heeded - FDA to Ban Cancer-Linked Red Dye No. 3...
The Stupid, It BURNS! Lefty Attacks Homeschooling, Proves HE'S the Dim Bulb Instead
Corrupt to the Core: Stacey Abrams Nonprofit Led by Ralph Warnock Admitted to...
DeSantis Takes Charge: Florida Gov Leads Charge with Groundbreaking Proposal to Back Trump...

NYT left some pretty major details out of their coverage of girl who aborted, burned, and buried her baby

Various

As you unfortunately may have heard, Nebraska teen Celeste Burgess has been sentenced to 90 days in jail after pleading guilty to illegally concealing a dead human body, the dead human body of her third-trimester baby that she, with her mother's help, aborted, tried to burn, and repeatedly buried in April 2022. The details are incredibly grisly, although you'd never know it from this New York Times' tweet:

Advertisement

No mention in there of the fact that Burgess was in her third trimester and that the baby could have been viable. No mention of the fact that Burgess and her mother buried the body multiple times. No mention of their attempts to burn the baby. Those seem like pretty significant details that should've been included in the tweet, no?

And the headline isn't any better:

Yeah, let us find our shocked faces. We're sure they're around here somewhere ...

More like crafty. It's quite obvious what the New York Times is trying to do.

Advertisement

The New York Times is counting on outrage from pro-aborts who can't be bothered to actually click the link and read the article.

In what universe does that information not deserve to be front and center in the New York Times' — and any outlet's, for that matter — tweet about this story?

At this point, we're honestly not sure that the New York Times even knows what actual journalism is. Or, more likely, they know but just couldn't possibly care less.

Advertisement

Ridiculous and shameful and disgusting.

Sick.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement