Tuberville Sounds Alarm on Mamdani's Ramadan Iftar as Threat—Mamdani Plays It off as...
Anti-ICE Dems Block DHS Funding Again As Synagogue in Michigan Is Attacked
Steven Crowder Taking ABC and Their Iran 'Slopaganda' APART Point-by-DAMNING-Point Is a BE...
Guy Benson Sarcastically Applauds Dems Who FINALLY Found Some Gov't Spending They’re Willi...
Senate Dems Pretend to Suddenly CARE About Gas Prices to Dunk on Trump...
Thune Advances the Save America Act After Trump Demands Results
The DESPERATE Way Eric Swalwell Is Trying to SPIN 'Fake Residency' Story, WOW,...
'Should Be Immediately Retracted'! Karoline Leavitt Shreds ABC News' 'BREAKING' Iran Threa...
CNN Takes a Break From Parroting Regime Propaganda and Just Plugs Into Iranian...
The First Great Awakening: A Revival That Prepared America for Independence
Dems Accusing GOP of Blocking Their Attempts to Fund FEMA, TSA and More...
Jessica Tarlov Does Her DAMNEDEST to Make U.S.'s Actions in Iran a FAILURE...
So Shellfish! Scott Jennings Confronts Paul Begala for Saying Hegseth Blew Millions on...
Worst ... Sitcom ... EVER! Tom Steyer Alleges Eric Swalwell Rents a Single...
'How Is It That They Don't Know This?' Salena Zito Shames Dems/Media Who...

NYT left some pretty major details out of their coverage of girl who aborted, burned, and buried her baby

Various

As you unfortunately may have heard, Nebraska teen Celeste Burgess has been sentenced to 90 days in jail after pleading guilty to illegally concealing a dead human body, the dead human body of her third-trimester baby that she, with her mother's help, aborted, tried to burn, and repeatedly buried in April 2022. The details are incredibly grisly, although you'd never know it from this New York Times' tweet:

Advertisement

No mention in there of the fact that Burgess was in her third trimester and that the baby could have been viable. No mention of the fact that Burgess and her mother buried the body multiple times. No mention of their attempts to burn the baby. Those seem like pretty significant details that should've been included in the tweet, no?

And the headline isn't any better:

Yeah, let us find our shocked faces. We're sure they're around here somewhere ...

More like crafty. It's quite obvious what the New York Times is trying to do.

Advertisement

The New York Times is counting on outrage from pro-aborts who can't be bothered to actually click the link and read the article.

In what universe does that information not deserve to be front and center in the New York Times' — and any outlet's, for that matter — tweet about this story?

At this point, we're honestly not sure that the New York Times even knows what actual journalism is. Or, more likely, they know but just couldn't possibly care less.

Advertisement

Ridiculous and shameful and disgusting.

Sick.

***

Editor's Note: Do you enjoy Twitchy's conservative reporting taking on the radical left and woke media? Support our work so that we can continue to bring you the truth.  Join Twitchy VIP and use the promo code SAVEAMERICA to get 40% off your VIP membership!

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos