Hasan Piker’s INSANE Rant: 'I Wipe My Bleep With the Constitution' — yet...
Journos Aren't Quick to Share a Couple Details While Hyperventilating About Being Used...
Nancy Pelosi Shines a Gaslight: 'Don't Blame Me, I Didn't Know Biden's Brain...
Star Tribune Hails Klobuchar As First Woman to Lead MN Dems — Skips...
Marco Rubio Declares He Is Not MAHA — RFK’s Sauerkraut-Meat Diet Is Crazy...
NBC News Waiting for Milwaukee Election Officials to Fix 'Human Error' Made for...
Socialist Holiday-Hater Francesca Hong Lost in WI After Sudden 'Human Error' Delayed the...
Scott Jennings Says Holiday Hatred Is Window Into Souls of Dem Party’s Anti-American...
Police Get a Bad Rap — but Moments Like This Show They Deserve...
What Would Happen to a Rapist With No Police or Prisons? DSA Rep....
Fledgling Sports Journalist Francesca Hong Learned That Sometimes You Have Bad Takes on...
Daily Wire: Why Are So Many Celebs Raising Trans Kids?
Leftist Influencers Note That Joe Biden Never Hid in a Catering Cart Like...
Mayor Scamdani: 'Defund the Police … Until My Wife Needs Free Bodyguards for...
NYT Reporter in 2026: What Happened to Investigation FBI Wanted Done Into Trump’s...

Merrick Garland refuses to admit that biological male prisoners could pose risk to female prisoners

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland is testifying today at a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, and in doing so is helping to remind us why we can’t stand him.

Advertisement

Transcript:

Lindsey Graham: “When it comes to federal prisons, are you aware that 1200 prisoners are requesting to be sent from a male prison to a female prison?”

Merrick Garland: “I’m not, no.”

Graham: “OK. Um, what is our policy when it comes to allowing a male prisoner to be transitioned into a female prison?”

Garland: “Uh, I think, uh, if you’re generally asking the question of how, um, trans people are dealt with in the Bureau of Prisons, my understanding, um, is that these are, uh, determinations about, um, uh, where they’re placed or where people are placed in general have to do with individualized determinations regarding the security of that individual, um, and the management of the prison, these are done on a case-by-case basis. That’s my understanding.”

Graham: “Are you aware of any policy guidelines that they use to make that determination?”

Garland: “I think there is a policy guideline along the lines that I just said, that, that, they are …”

Graham: “I would like for the Bureau of Prisons to send it to us. Are you concerned that if a biological male was sent to a female prison, that could be a risk to female prisoners?”

Garland: “I think every, uh, uh, person in prison has to be dealt with, uh, with dignity and respect. Uh, that determinations of the safety questions you’re talking about have to be made on an individualized basis.”

Advertisement

We get that the “Hon.” in front of his name is kind of the way these things are done, but truth be told, there’s nothing remotely honorable about Garland’s position.

Nailed it.

It’s not an answer. But it still says a lot about Garland. And none of it’s good.

We’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: We really dodged a bullet when the Senate GOP filibustered his SCOTUS nomination.

***

Related:

American Medical Association asks Attorney General Merrick Garland to look into those coordinating threats against children’s hospitals

Advertisement

***

Join us in the fight. Become a Twitchy VIP member today and use promo code SAVEAMERICA to receive a 40% discount on your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement