House Probes Minnesota Fraud: Walz & Ellison Invited – X Users Predict No-Show...
MN Dems Have Gone From 'Defund the Police' to 'Call the Cops If...
Christopher Rufo Explains Why Bari Weiss Has a Lot More Work to Do...
Delusional Tim Walz Exposes Trump's Evil Genius 'Long Game' With Minnesota Fraud Crackdown
Sterling's Rx for America: Shut It All Down – Close Borders, Defund NGOs,...
NYC Democrats Begin Painting the City Marxist Red as Commie Mamdani Prepares to...
Records Vanish Pre-Audit: MN Daycare 'Hit' by Mystery Break-In After Sleuths Spot Empty...
Leftists on CNN’s NewsNight Blame Nick Shirley, Trump, and Racism Instead of Somali...
Beyond the Pale: Code-Talker Tim Walz Tosses White Guys Under the Bus to...
CNN’s Abby Phillip Portrays Somali ‘Daycare’ Workers As Victims of Independent Journalist...
'Finally, Something NOT Infuriating!' NASA's Shot of Pluto's Icy Mountains Graces the Time...
UK Citizen Keir Starmer Was 'Delighted' to Have Back Home Says Zionists Are...
X User Posts About 'Immigrants Robbing You' but Accidentally Flexes Billionaires Who DIDN'...
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey Addresses the Somali Community in Somali to Defy Donald...
CNN Laments That 'MAGA Journalist' Nick Shirley Had No Guardrails

Merrick Garland refuses to admit that biological male prisoners could pose risk to female prisoners

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland is testifying today at a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, and in doing so is helping to remind us why we can’t stand him.

Advertisement

Transcript:

Lindsey Graham: “When it comes to federal prisons, are you aware that 1200 prisoners are requesting to be sent from a male prison to a female prison?”

Merrick Garland: “I’m not, no.”

Graham: “OK. Um, what is our policy when it comes to allowing a male prisoner to be transitioned into a female prison?”

Garland: “Uh, I think, uh, if you’re generally asking the question of how, um, trans people are dealt with in the Bureau of Prisons, my understanding, um, is that these are, uh, determinations about, um, uh, where they’re placed or where people are placed in general have to do with individualized determinations regarding the security of that individual, um, and the management of the prison, these are done on a case-by-case basis. That’s my understanding.”

Graham: “Are you aware of any policy guidelines that they use to make that determination?”

Garland: “I think there is a policy guideline along the lines that I just said, that, that, they are …”

Graham: “I would like for the Bureau of Prisons to send it to us. Are you concerned that if a biological male was sent to a female prison, that could be a risk to female prisoners?”

Garland: “I think every, uh, uh, person in prison has to be dealt with, uh, with dignity and respect. Uh, that determinations of the safety questions you’re talking about have to be made on an individualized basis.”

Advertisement

We get that the “Hon.” in front of his name is kind of the way these things are done, but truth be told, there’s nothing remotely honorable about Garland’s position.

Nailed it.

It’s not an answer. But it still says a lot about Garland. And none of it’s good.

We’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: We really dodged a bullet when the Senate GOP filibustered his SCOTUS nomination.

***

Related:

American Medical Association asks Attorney General Merrick Garland to look into those coordinating threats against children’s hospitals

Advertisement

***

Join us in the fight. Become a Twitchy VIP member today and use promo code SAVEAMERICA to receive a 40% discount on your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement