I Asked Sean Spicer to Judge Trump's First 100 Days as President
Looks Like Tim Walz and His Whackjob Wife: WATCH Bizarre Dance Footage of...
Conservative X UNLOADS on Chuck Schumer for This DETESTABLE Claim About the Republican...
Welp, It's Official! Green Energy Is an Economic Death Sentence (Heck, Spain's Grid...
We're SHOCKED She Was Fired. Totally: WATCH Former State Dept. Chick LOSE IT...
'Jill, Go to BED!' Joe Biden Congratulating Mark Carney and the Liberal Party...
X Has SO Much Fun Dragging Dem and Mighty Trump Impeacher Shri Thanedar...
HOOBOY! Stephen Miller Takes Jon Favreau to the Curb with the REST of...
AYFKM? WHCA's 2024 Photo of the Year Says EVERYTHING About Why the Legacy...
'Farewell and Adieu to You, Spanish Lightbulbs': Spain's Green Energy Boast Marred by...
Drained and Damaged by Biden: Repairing and Refilling the Strategic Petroleum Reserve Will...
Ball of Rage: Governor Pritzker is Rolling Out More Violent Rhetoric Since Dems...
One and the Same: Chuck Todd Rants at Mirror While Blaming Dem Party...
LISTEN: Justice Jackson Accidentally Makes the Case for the RIGHT to Vouchers (And...
Ground Chuck: Scott Jennings Compares Schumer’s Strongly-Worded Letter Method to His Grill...

WaPo dives into 'study' finding that Shark Week features way too many white men named Mike

Having solved all other problems, the Washington Post can now turn its attention to the things that really matter. Like, the inherent pro-white-male, anti-shark bias in Discovery’s annual “Shark Week” tradition:

Advertisement

Alrighty then.

Please. A shark wouldn’t be caught dead writing something so stupid.

No, this was written — as is way too often the case — by a woke busybody. Read it and weep (or at least slam your head against your desk):

[Allegheny College biology professor Lisa] Whitenack led a team of researchers to examine hundreds of “Shark Week” episodes that aired between 1988 and 2020. In a study published last month by the Public Library of Science, their research claims that Discovery’s programming emphasized negative messages about sharks, lacked useful messaging about shark conservation and overwhelmingly featured White men as experts — including several with the same name.

The programming featured more White experts and commentators named “Mike” than women, said David Shiffman, a conservationist at Arizona State University who was a co-author of the study.

Discovery did not respond to a request for comment on the study’s findings. The company told NBC Boston that it wouldn’t comment on a study “that has yet to pass any scientific approvals” after a preliminary version was presented 2021. It has since undergone a scientific review, Whitenack said.

Well, good for Discovery. They’re absolute right not to dignify WaPo with a comment on the “study’s” findings. Imagine giving the tine of day to a “study” concluding that there are too many people named “Mike” involved and not enough positive affirmation for the shark community.

Yes, but not the intentional kind.

Just this, basically:

Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional text and tweets.

***

Help us keep owning the libs! Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code AMERICAFIRST to receive a 25% discount off your membership!

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos