CBS Is Being Absolutely Dragged Over Battleground State Comments, and It's Glorious
Trump’s Stint as a Fry Cook Made Young Men Like Him More
The Left Can't Meme: Planned Parenthood Action Deletes Its Attempt
New Republic: Trump Cancels All Events in Favor of One of the Worst...
Brutal Bruce: Springsteen's Singing Has Listeners Plugging Their Bleeding Ears
Washington Post Confirms That Trump Is Not Literally Hitler
Kamala Harris Assures Us We Will Work Together, Convening Together to Work
Jimmy Kimmel Is Afraid He's On Donald Trump's Enemies List
Woke Doctor Sacrifices Children on the Altar of Trans Activism
Atlantic Staff Writer Says Blacks and Latinos Are Moving Toward Trump Because They’re...
Defenders of Democracy Won't Like THIS! Gallup Poll Shows VAST MAJORITY Back Voter...
Brian Stelter: The Bigger Question Is Would Americans Prefer a Dictatorial Approach
Orwell to the White Courtesy Phone! U.K. Will Arrest, Fine People for Pro-Life...
George Santos Trolls the Democrats Using their Own Tactics Against Them
THIS Is Why Dems Are Pivoting to Hitler: Trump Gets RECORD Support With...

WaPo dives into 'study' finding that Shark Week features way too many white men named Mike

Having solved all other problems, the Washington Post can now turn its attention to the things that really matter. Like, the inherent pro-white-male, anti-shark bias in Discovery’s annual “Shark Week” tradition:

Advertisement

Alrighty then.

Please. A shark wouldn’t be caught dead writing something so stupid.

No, this was written — as is way too often the case — by a woke busybody. Read it and weep (or at least slam your head against your desk):

[Allegheny College biology professor Lisa] Whitenack led a team of researchers to examine hundreds of “Shark Week” episodes that aired between 1988 and 2020. In a study published last month by the Public Library of Science, their research claims that Discovery’s programming emphasized negative messages about sharks, lacked useful messaging about shark conservation and overwhelmingly featured White men as experts — including several with the same name.

The programming featured more White experts and commentators named “Mike” than women, said David Shiffman, a conservationist at Arizona State University who was a co-author of the study.

Discovery did not respond to a request for comment on the study’s findings. The company told NBC Boston that it wouldn’t comment on a study “that has yet to pass any scientific approvals” after a preliminary version was presented 2021. It has since undergone a scientific review, Whitenack said.

Well, good for Discovery. They’re absolute right not to dignify WaPo with a comment on the “study’s” findings. Imagine giving the tine of day to a “study” concluding that there are too many people named “Mike” involved and not enough positive affirmation for the shark community.

Yes, but not the intentional kind.

Just this, basically:

Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional text and tweets.

***

Help us keep owning the libs! Join Twitchy VIP and use promo code AMERICAFIRST to receive a 25% discount off your membership!

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement