Sen. Corey Booker Observes Brian Sicknick Day in New Jersey, Who Gave His...
LBC: Three Migrants Found Dead on Boat in the English Channel; All Women,...
'Now Is the Time to Do What You're Told': MAZE Compiles COVID Fear-Mongering...
Trump Invites Viral Teen Lifeguard Hero to the White House — and Usual...
Madison Is Paying Overtime to Keep CRAZ, the Corey Ruiz Autonomous Zone, Blocked...
Bernie Sanders Asks How ‘Poor’ Mark Zuckerberg Will Survive If CA Passes Wealth...
Maine Dems Swap Nazi Senate Candidate for Guy Who Fathered Kids With His...
Haitian Migrant Reminds Us That Haitians Built America
Rep. Ayanna Pressley Posts Cringe-Inducing Anti-ICE Dad Joke
Clay Travis Reminds America: While Fauci Deflects, DeSantis Faced the Tyranny—and Saved Us
Idol Foments: MS NOW’s Lawrence O’Donnell Defiantly Refuses to Accept Fauci’s a Fraud,...
Spanish Prime Minister Is Fully Committed to 'Restoring Normalcy' During Invasion of Moroc...
Faux Photo: WGN Airs Fake Pic of 49ers Coach in Hospital Bed Flanked...
While Spain Gets Invaded, Here Are Reminders About What Team Biden Allowed and...
Texas Court Swears in Witness 'in the Name of Allah,' Igniting Fury Over...
Premium

Merriam-Webster has also tweaked their definition of 'girl' (and 'boy') in order to be a safe space for all the little trans kids out there

Yesterday, we told you about Merriam-Webster’s sneaky little amendment to their definition of “female.” Here it is again:

A number of people pointed out that if “female” means “having a gender identity that is the opposite of male,” Merriam-Webster’s definition of “male” would have to be a lot clearer than their definition of “female.” Well, guess what: it isn’t. It’s this:

So, a female is the opposite of a male, which is the opposite of a female, which is the opposite of a male, which is the opposite of a female … and by this point, you’re probably dizzy from going around in circles. We know we are.

But join us if you will on one more little trip. Let’s take a look at how Merriam-Webster defines “girl,” shall we?

What was wrong with “a young woman”? Why did they need to change it to “a person whose gender identity is female”?

And in case you’re wondering, yes, they did, in fact, do something similar for boy:

This is getting ridiculous. And stupid. And anti-scientific. And anti-language. And anti-sane.

When did words stop meaning things? Because we’d like to go back to the time before that. This timeline is just too much.

We wish. Boy (pun intended), do we wish this were all just a silly joke, instead of a sickening one.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement