Adam Schiff Begs Pam Bondi to Stop Trump Making Fun of His ‘Watermelon...
CNN Poll: Biden Leaves Office With His Approval Rating at Its Lowest
Phase One of Hostage Release to Include TWO of THREE Cherished American Captives...
Try Locking Up the CRIMINALS Instead! Walgreens CEO Says Shoplifting Prevention Led to...
KJP Dismisses State Dept. Spox As 'Random Person' to Avoid Crediting Trump for...
California Dreamin': How the Left Destroyed Life in the Golden State
Karine Jean-Pierre Ends Tenure as Mouthpiece for the King of Lies
CRY HARDER, Chucky! Schumer Warns Trump's Energy Secretary Is a Fossil Fuel Executive...
A Desperate Plea from a Fellow Mom of Redheads: Join Me in Praying...
Hits Us DIRECTLY in the Feels: Twitter User Shares Heartwarming Story About L.A....
Pam Bondi Tells Sen. Alex Padilla She Will Not Be Bullied by Him
Is the Pope Catholic? No, We're Really Asking: Check Out What Pope Francis...
'Is That a Joke?' Biden Asked If He or Trump Should Get Credit...
'Pure Savage!' GOP Rep Uses His Phone to Test Witness' Claim SSA Telework...
Ivy Beleaguered: J.D. Vance HUMILIATES Yale Professor Who Claims Pete Hegseth Will Destroy...
Premium

Merriam-Webster has also tweaked their definition of 'girl' (and 'boy') in order to be a safe space for all the little trans kids out there

Yesterday, we told you about Merriam-Webster’s sneaky little amendment to their definition of “female.” Here it is again:

A number of people pointed out that if “female” means “having a gender identity that is the opposite of male,” Merriam-Webster’s definition of “male” would have to be a lot clearer than their definition of “female.” Well, guess what: it isn’t. It’s this:

So, a female is the opposite of a male, which is the opposite of a female, which is the opposite of a male, which is the opposite of a female … and by this point, you’re probably dizzy from going around in circles. We know we are.

But join us if you will on one more little trip. Let’s take a look at how Merriam-Webster defines “girl,” shall we?

What was wrong with “a young woman”? Why did they need to change it to “a person whose gender identity is female”?

And in case you’re wondering, yes, they did, in fact, do something similar for boy:

This is getting ridiculous. And stupid. And anti-scientific. And anti-language. And anti-sane.

When did words stop meaning things? Because we’d like to go back to the time before that. This timeline is just too much.

We wish. Boy (pun intended), do we wish this were all just a silly joke, instead of a sickening one.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement