RUN, BRANDON, RUN: Chicago Mayor SPRINTS From the Media When Asked About Killed...
Senator Kennedy Humiliates Democrat Witness, Reads Nasty Old Tweets Out Loud
MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski Scolds Al Sharpton for Daring to Compare This to January...
Fate of Aid Shipment to Gaza Might Shock Only the Biden White House...
White House Post Condemning 'Hate Speech and Violence' Couldn't Possibly Be More Predictab...
No One Believes You: Jamaal Bowman Says He Was a Victim of Police...
Donald Trump Delivers Pizza to FDNY
'Absolute Legend': Man Mocks UCLA Anti-Israel Protestors (WATCH)
Border Patrol Agent Accused of Whipping Illegal Immigrants Wins Award
Rep. Jamaal Bowman Declares Racist Daniel Penny Guilty of Murder Even Before the...
Here’s CNN’s EXCLUSIVE Framing of DOJ Civil Rights Chief Lying to the Senate
Title IX Reforms and Campus Protests Prove Government Will Not Protect You
Pro-Hamas Activists Tie Themselves to Flag Pole After Raising Palestinian Flag
Hims CEO Looking to Hire Protesters Who Know Moral Courage Beats a College...
Biden Continues to Earn the Respect of Other Countries by Calling Japan 'Xenophobic'

Sports Illustrated explains how SCOTUS ruling upholding HS football coach's right to pray on-field could erode 'a bedrock of American democracy'

It’s SCOTUS decision time. So, naturally, Sports Illustrated is there to break it down for us.

They’re specifically interested in the case of public high school football coach Joe Kennedy, who walked out onto the field at a game one night and dropped to his knees in prayer, by himself. According to Sports Illustrated, a ruling in his favor could singlehandedly erode a bedrock of American democracy:

Advertisement

More from Sports Illustrated:

Kennedy insisted then and maintains now that he didn’t want any attention. That he desired only to pray, by himself, briefly, right there, as he had done after every game for eight seasons until the school told him that fall he had to stop. And that, despite his leadership role overseeing impressionable teenagers, his actions weren’t intended to coerce anyone.

His opponents say his intentions don’t matter, and, if they did, this scene was his creation, anyway. Kennedy had spent those previous six weeks conducting multiple interviews that exacerbated his conflict with the school. Two weeks before the game, he had retained First Liberty, the powerful Christian conservative law firm, in his burgeoning legal battle against the district. And he intensified the spotlight’s glare before kickoff with a pregame Facebook post, announcing a big night upcoming. In signing off, he asked for prayers.

He asked for prayers? Why wasn’t he locked up right then and there?

Advertisement

More:

Regardless, the coach makes for an unlikely figurehead in these legal theatrics. He was aimless for most of his 53 years. For decades, he wasn’t religious at all, and he isn’t overtly so now. He never followed football all that closely. And yet, he is now at the center of a seven-year legal conflict that started with that covenant—to pray after every game. That morphed into a controversy, then a circus, then a lawsuit centered on the First Amendment and its clauses. That broadened into a political brawl. That widened into a culture-war cudgel. And that wound through the court system, until case No. 21-418 landed on the docket for the Supreme Court of the United States.

Kennedy’s life is now part of the public domain, an emblem to be viewed, utilized and manipulated for others’ aims. He’s a human embodiment of a country that’s deeply divided; a religious movement that’s surging with momentum, even as organized religion becomes increasingly less popular; and, most of all, a powerful right-wing machine many say is employing a timeless division tactic: us vs. them. All morphed a man’s unremarkable existence into an extraordinary one and imbued Kennedy with elusive, far-reaching purpose. He’s no longer just a man. He’s now a symbol, for what his supporters term “religious freedom.”

Advertisement

“What his supporters term ‘religious freedom.'” So … religious freedom, then.

That is effectively what Sports Illustrated is attempting to argue.

It means whatever the hell Sports Illustrated wants it to mean.

But we do not think it means what Sports Illustrated thinks it means.

We’d be embarrassed for Sports Illustrated if this were a one-off for them, but they’ve been playing around in the political kiddie pool for several years now and clearly haven’t learned their lesson. So that’s on them.

Advertisement

The First Amendment even extends to Sports Illustrated. They have the right to make complete asses of themselves as often as they like. Which seems to be pretty often these days.

Advertisement

Maybe someone should pray for Sports Illustrated.

Pray that they get their priorities straight.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement