If You Donate to Harvard's 'Viewpoint Diversity' Scam, You Are Probably Dumb Enough...
Hero or Hustler? Special Forces Operator Busted for Wagering (and Winning Big) On...
Hakeem Jeffries Can’t Quit Ron DeSantis — Calls Him Boring While He Sounds...
ABC News Breaks Ground: 6 PM Confirmed as Dinner Time – Nation Shocked,...
Podcaster Jennifer Welch: Dems Schumer and Jeffries Are Acting Like Trump’s ‘Fascist Colla...
A Lesson In Deflection: Dem Hakeem Jeffries Dodges Boy’s Question on ‘Take Your...
Pallywood Employing Child Actors for Its Latest Propaganda Campaign
NBC Tells DOGE Layoff Sob Stories on Behalf of the DNC
Gavin Newsom Funded an NGO Tasked With Importing HIV-Positive Migrants
NYC Mayor Mamdani Earns Sarcastic Applause After Billionaire 'Name and Shame' Effort Start...
High-Six-Figure USAID Layoffs Meet Public Eye-Roll: 'You Made Bank Off Our Taxes'
Investigative Reporter Self-Owns While Arguing Conservatives Are Lying About the SPLC Indi...
Writer Brags About Stealing from Whole Foods with Hasan Piker — Turns Out...
Hypocrite Jim Acosta Leaves Replies On, Does ‘So Many Triggered People’ Meme
Tucker Carlson Asks How American Evangelicals Can 'Support' IDF Soldier Vandalizing Jesus...

The AP and Breaking911 had the exact same headline about FDA restricting J&J vaccine ... guess which one Twitter flagged as 'misleading'

In case you missed it, yesterday, the FDA put strict limits on who can get Johnson & Johnson’s COVID vaccine.

Advertisement

More from the AP:

FDA’s vaccine chief Dr. Peter Marks said the agency decided to restrict the vaccine after taking another look at the data on the risks of life-threatening blood clots and concluding that they are limited to J&J’s vaccine.

“If there’s an alternative that appears to be equally effective in preventing severe outcomes from COVID-19, we’d rather see people opting for that,” Marks said. “But we’ve been careful to say that– compared to no vaccine– this is still a better option.”

Under the new FDA instructions, J&J’s vaccine could still be given to people who had a severe allergic reaction to one of the other vaccines and can’t receive an additional dose. J&J’s shot could also be an option for people who refuse to receive the mRNA vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna, and therefore would otherwise remain unvaccinated, the agency said.

This is a pretty big deal, so it’s understandable that an account like @Breaking911 would cover it as well. And they did.

But their coverage was a little different from the AP’s. See if you can spot it.

Here’s the AP’s headline:

And here’s Breaking911’s headline:

See the difference yet? No? Well, clearly you’re not as discerning as Twitter, who saw a huge difference:

Clearly the AP’s tweet was acceptable as-is, but Breaking911’s was not. Wonder what that’s about.

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/RBPundit/status/1522586360334401539

Almost. But they’d never do something like that, would they?

Some tweeters out there are actually defending Twitter’s selective “misleading” label by saying that Breaking911’s tweet lacked the context of the AP’s. But evidently Twitter couldn’t even buy that:

Baby steps.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement