OOPSIE! THEIR BAD! Study shows many scientific publications MAY have 'exaggerated' risks f...
WHOA: Post sharing 'reported inside info' explaining how Democrats will install Newsom a...
'Isn't this interesting': Wikipedia attempts to edit and erase history of actual Nazi,...
It's so ON! Elon Musk has HAD IT, set to expose Biden's southern...
Harry Smollett - sorry - Sisson's terrible, horrible, no-good, very bad bomb threat...
Huge new development in ‘Sound of Freedom’ donor ‘kidnapping’ case
Maxwell Frost is ONCE AGAIN mad landlords have rules about how they rent...
AP notes 'critics' say Rumble promotes far-right extremism and conspiracy theories
WaPo's Joe Biden simp Philip Bump locks down replies to his latest defense...
USA TODAY talks to voters and learns who their REAL ideal candidate is
Ted Cruz SCHOOLS anti-Christian organization targeting Auburn mass baptism
No wonder Donald Trump said he wanted to buy a Glock
Twitter offers its farewells (LOL) to Megan Rapinoe after final USWNT match
Democrats post slow-motion video of Joe Biden delivering for Gen Z
Oversight Committee to hold first impeachment inquiry hearing Thursday

'YIKES': NYT 'editor's note' admits they kinda sorta completely overlooked Palestinian prof's vicious antisemitism in article last month

It’s a day ending in “y,” and you know what that means: another editor’s note to correct a bogus record in the New York Times.

Today’s editor’s note comes to us from a New York Times article written almost a month ago about Refaat Alareer, a professor in Gaza. See, it seems that Prof. Alareer is not as friendly toward Israel as the Times’ article initially suggested he was:


If only there had been some clue that Refaat Alareer didn’t like Israel very much …

Oh, wait. There was. In the freaking New York Times:

If reading what they publish is too tall an order, they can always check out Twitter:


That’s just a small sample from the past few days. Imagine how much material there is from the month since the New York Times published the article in question. Imagine how much material there is from the months since the New York Times published his opinion piece about how Israel wants to terrify if not murder Palestinian children. Imagine how much material there is from the entire time Refaat Alareer has been on Twitter.

So weird that this sort of thing keeps happening.

That’s pretty much where the New York Times is at right now. Only they’re even deeper in fecal matter.


Hey, man. Clicks are clicks.

The New York Times apparently doesn’t agree. Sorry.

They may have gotten caught, but count on them to do it again. And again and again and again.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Twitchy Videos