PolitiFact Running Border Cover for VP Harris Is Reason #4,285 Why You Don't...
OWNED! Drew Holden HUMILIATES Media in Receipt-Filled Thread of Their Actual Kamala Border...
Dem Sen. Chris Murphy's Bad Week Continued After His Kamala Claim Earned a...
Glaringly Leftist Newsweek Harpy Claims Trump Might NOT Have Been Shot and HOO...
Journo Reads a Whole Lot Into 'Powerful Photo' of Joe and Hunter Biden...
Democrats Prove Once Again THEY Are a Threat to Democracy Pulling THIS with...
VIP: I Think Vance Was a Bad Choice BUT Not Bad Enough to...
Mark Cuban's Anti-Trump Poll Goes SO WRONG He Melts DOWN, Posts SECOND Poll...
BOOP/BOP/BEEP, IT IS ON: Judge Denies Motion to Dismiss Gina Carano's Lawsuit Against...
He's the GOAT: James Woods Mocks Kamala's Palace Coup As Only He Can...
YOU Support Them: Chris Murphy Face Plants as Pro-Hamas Protesters Burn American Flags...
Kamala Harris Cackles at Being Informed She's the Most Liberal Senator
Send in the Clowns: Democrats Praise Joe Biden for Lying to the American...
POLITICO: 'Republicans POUNCE' on Pro-Hamas Protesters Burning US Flags
Court Dismisses Defamation Case Brought by 'Mary Poppins of Misinformation'

MIT cancels U. of Chicago geophysics professor's upcoming science lecture because of his unwoke position on 'diversity, equity, and inclusion'

University of Chicago associate professor and geophysicist Dorian Abbot was set to deliver a lecture at MIT later this month. We say “was set” because his lecture has been canceled.

Advertisement

Princeton University professor and legal scholar Robert P. George breaks down what happened:

Here’s what Prof. Abbot and Stanford associate professor of accounting Ivan Marinovic wrote in an opinion piece this past August:

The words “diversity, equity and inclusion” sound just, and are often supported by well-intentioned people, but their effects are the opposite of noble sentiments. Most importantly, “equity” does not mean fair and equal treatment. DEI seeks to increase the representation of some groups through discrimination against members of other groups. The underlying premise of DEI is that any statistical difference between group representation on campus and national averages reflects systemic injustice and discrimination by the university itself. The magnitude of the distortions is significant: for some job searches discrimination rises to the level of implicitly or explicitly excluding applicants from certain groups.

DEI violates the ethical and legal principle of equal treatment. It entails treating people as members of a group rather than as individuals, repeating the mistake that made possible the atrocities of the 20th century. It requires being willing to tell an applicant “I will ignore your merits and qualifications and deny you admission because you belong to the wrong group, and I have defined a more important social objective that justifies doing so.” It treats persons as merely means to an end, giving primacy to a statistic over the individuality of a human being.

DEI compromises the university’s mission. The core business of the university is the search for truth. A university’s intellectual environment depends fundamentally on its commitment to hiring the most talented and best trained minds: any departure from this commitment must come at the expense of academic excellence, and ultimately will compromise the university’s contribution to society. This point is particularly urgent given that DEI considerations often reduce the pool of truly eligible candidates by a factor of two or more.

Advertisement

And for daring to suggest that DEI programs actually hamper diversity and can result in brain drains, Abbot had to pay.

Advertisement

Enough is enough.

Amen to that.

We’ll give the last word to Prof. Abbot, who’s a lot more gracious toward MIT than MIT deserves, and certainly more gracious than we would be in his position:

Advertisement

Prof. Abbot is a class act. Any university would be lucky to have him lecture there.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos