Liz Warren ALREADY Exploiting Brown Shooting to Push Gun Control and Dana Loesch...
Rashida Tlaib Claims Congress Has ALL THE MONEY to Feed and Give FREE...
Sexist, Racist Newsom Press Office TOOL DRAGGED for Literally Trashing Nicki Minaj for...
ABC Hypes Up Scary Polar Bears Study Complete With Climate Alarmism Tropes
Here's Further Proof That 'Jingle Bells' Is Racist
Sen. Patty Murray Wants Immediate Release of 'Constituent' Mauled by DHS K9
Illegal Who Entered 7 Times and Sexually Assaulted Woman Praised by Judge for...
ABC News: Sen. Mark Warner Says Type of Ammo Used in Drug Boat...
All Black Coaches Will Pay: Jemele Hill Predictably Drops a Race Card on...
MS NOW's Senior Legal Reporter Goes All-In With Narrative of Trump With Minors...
White Guilt Over Accountability: Minneapolis Shrugs at $250M Stolen from Hungry Kids
Questions Surround Mass Shooting at Brown University; Several Reported Injured
Jasmine Crockett Claims She Gets the Struggles of Farmers and Ranchers, Knows the...
Rep. Bennie Thompson Asks Where in the US Is Antifa
Scott Jennings: Suing Dems Will Need SWAT Teams and Kentucky Colonels to Stop...

Blue-checked political scientist makes a totally irrational argument to argue that there's no rational argument against spending $3.5 trillion

Don’t think the government has $3.5 trillion dollars to spend on “infrastructure”? Well, think again.

Because as political scientist Ian Bremmer explains, not only can the government do it, but they’d be stupid not to:

Advertisement

According to our calculations, there are actually endless rational arguments against it, but no rational arguments for. We do agree with Ian that “it’s just politics,” though. The Democrats are purely about politics, and not about what’s actually best for anyone other than the government.

https://twitter.com/vjeannek/status/1437418724361900033

Advertisement

Looks like Ian Bremmer doesn’t actually know what the hell he’s talking about. Shocker.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos