'It's a LOT Worse': Svetlana Lokhova Shares Now-Declassified Susan Rice Email About 'Hidin...
Eric Swalwell Claims ICE Agents Terrorize Women and Are Not ‘Real Men’ All...
You HAVE to Watch What the Philadelphia Phillies Did With Their ‘Kiss Cam’...
Stars No More: Colbert Treated ‘Journos’ and Dems Like Celebrities - No Wonder...
Dunked On: WNBA Players Wear Tone-Deaf ‘Pay Us What You Owe Us’ T-Shirts...
Flashback: Mark Cuban Calls Trump a Ham Sandwich When Comparing Intelligence
Why Dems Are Really Upset Over Colbert's Canceling
Sen. Alex Padilla Thought a Judge Had Ordered an End to ICE’s Racial...
The 'Good Trouble Lives On' Protests Drew a Certain Demographic
You Mad, Bro? Mark Warner Attacks Tulsi Gabbard Over Damning Obama Russiagate Doc...
Despicable UNRWA Continues Parroting Hamas LIES About Children Dying In Gaza
Jamie Lee Curtis on Colbert Cancellation: ‘We Will Just Get Louder’
Elizabeth Warren Cosplays As Columbo to 'Investigate' Paramount/CBS Over Colbert Firing
Isaac Hayes III Makes Horrifying Allegations About Scientology and His Father’s Departure...
Brian Stelter Says There's a Feeling Inside the WSJ They Made an Act...
Premium

News you can use: The New York Times is all over Lena Dunham's starring role in the 'Spanx Liberation Movement'

“All the news that’s fit to print.”

That might be the most famous newspaper slogan out there, and it belongs to the New York Times.

And we’re thinking it might be time for an update:

If someone could please invent a time machine that could send us back to before that story and tweet were written, we’d be eternally grateful.

OK, that’s true.

Let’s not go there, please.

We don’t care, and we’re annoyed that the New York Times thinks we do. That’s very presumptuous of them, and also just plain wrong.

If that person actually exists, we need to find them and make them go to their room until they’ve thought about what they’ve done.

We’d be fine with less Lena Dunham news.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos