SAVE Act Opponent Barack Obama Has an IRONIC Requirement in Order to Win...
NY Times Spotted Serving Up Another Embarrassing Take (It's 123 Years Old and...
Here's Why the NY Times' Cringey NATO Headline Likely Made It Past 'Layers...
Dem Rep. LaMonica McIver Would Appreciate Help With Legal Expenses to Fight Charges...
Calif. Investigation Confirms What We Already Knew: Gavin Newsom's Gas Price Blame Game...
Eric Swalwell Says Dem Congress Will Subpoena FBI Agents Who Refuse to Come...
Jim Acosta Laughably Worries That CNN Will Become a Propaganda Network Under New...
Tim Miller Left GOP Over Trump… But Defending Hasan Piker’s Misogyny and ‘America...
Idaho Democrat Tells Parents: Kids Belong to the State Once They Walk Into...
NATO Ratio: Flubbed NYT Iran War Headline Creates Groundswell of Acronym Acrimony Online
Google Is Free: X BODIES Obama-Era Diplomat For Asking and (Wrongly) Answering His...
Biden Walks Through an Airport: Case Closed, He Was Never Senile, You Conspiracy...
Fenway Erupts in Boos: Healey & Wu Get a Brutal, Well-Deserved Reception on...
Don't Back a Florida Man (or Woman) Into a Corner—And Don't Commit Crime...
TIME Mag Review of Springsteen's HISTORIC 'Resistance' Concert Couldn't Possibly Be More O...

Looks like Dan Rather didn't think too hard before sharing his 'pretty simple' thoughts on voter suppression

We’re assuming this is supposed to be Dan Rather’s attempt at selling Americans on the For the People Act, or perhaps Texas’ voting bill, but why would anyone ever buy anything Dan Rather’s selling?

Advertisement

We’ve been reading Dan Rather’s book for decades, and we’re not impressed.

Just because he’s old as dirt doesn’t make him a treasure, Kelli.

And speaking of books …

It’s true.

Advertisement

Read another book, Dan.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement