Crash and Splash: Texas Woman’s Pole Dancing Attempt Breaks Fire Sprinkler and Floods...
Commie Chameleon: DSA Co-Chair Says It’s Not Extreme to Abolish Capitalism, Senate, and...
Red, White, and Ewww: The View’s Sunny Hostin Says American Flags in Neighborhoods...
Hot Take: The ‘Do Not Comply’ Crowd Who Opposed Masking Thinks Illegals Should...
Riddle of the Sphincter: Did Democrat Chuck Schumer Pass Something in the Senate...
The Atlantic: The Democratic Manly Man Is Back As Democrats Embrace Masculinity
Activist Judge Frees Plane Hijacker Awaiting Deportation
Gay Couple Sues Surrogate for Not Aborting Baby With Cleft Lip
Study: Apple and Google News Suppressed Negative Stories About Graham Platner for Months
Independent Journalist Jim Acosta Is Back at the Reflecting Pool, Reporting No Signs...
Flake E. Jean Carroll Receives $5.62 Million Payment From President Trump
All Hell Breaks Loose After ICE Shooting As Democrats Caught Lying Again
So, Yeah ... THIS Is Gonna Suck: Little House on the Prairie Remake...
Seven Years of Lies and B.S.: Gov. Whitmer's Social Media Guru Gets MOCKED...
Mentally Ill Guy Who Thinks He's a Woman Applied for Asylum in the...

Peter Strzok (yes, that one) laments 'the corrupt transformation of our criminal justice system' after Kevin Clinesmith pleads guilty

These are dark times for the cause of justice. At least according to Peter Strzok:

Advertisement

What, exactly, is Strzok’s beef?

That’s it in a nutshell. From the Lawfare piece Strzok is pimping:

Ironically, the Clinesmith charges were filed at the same time that the Justice Department awaits a ruling on its motion to dismiss the case against Flynn—for lack of materiality. The department tied itself into knots to argue that Flynn’s lies were immaterial. Yet, strangely, it gives no such benefit to Clinesmith.

We wonder why these Flynn defenders—led by the president and the attorney general—have not lifted their voices on behalf of Clinesmith. Proof of materiality seems weaker in Clinesmith’s case than in Flynn’s. The CIA email that Clinesmith altered stated accurately that Page was “not a source” but that he was an “operational contact,” that is, someone with a relationship with the CIA. Clinesmith’s alteration arguably clarified the adviser’s relationship with the CIA rather than obscuring it, though this does not excuse his misrepresentation.

In the real world, these details about Clinesmith’s email do not defeat the materiality requirement—especially given that, as we have noted, materiality is typically easy to prove. But the arguments made in defense of Flynn would also seem to apply to Clinesmith. If we applied the ridiculous standard used by the Justice Department in the Flynn case to Clinesmith, then his alteration was similarly not material.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos