Battle of the Bulge: Olympic Ski Jumpers Allegedly Injecting Themselves 'Down There' for...
Another Crazed Nurse Posts Anti-ICE Video, Appears to Be Armed With Saline Spray
Scott Jennings Comes Up Empty in Attempt to Teach Econ 101 to CNN...
Pretend to Be SHOCKED: New Watchdog Report Links Rashida Tlaib to Terrorist Groups
Don Lemon Calls JD Vance a Vile Human Being and Not a Real...
Rep. Summer Lee Says ICE Is Not the Gestapo but 'Regular, Run of...
Rep. Explains How ‘Dignity Act’ Would Grant Legal Status to a 'Segment' of...
Amnesty International Gets Ratioed and Wrecked Over 'RIP Fact-Checkers'-Style Take on Mass...
Sen. Chris Van Hollen Asks Scott Bessent If He'd Like to Retract His...
Semi-Truck Driver Who Crashed Into a Van of Amish Men, Killing Four, Was...
Rep. Maria Salazar Tells ICE Not to Touch the Ones Picking Up the...
Matt Walsh and Other ‘Writers’ Laid Off by Washington Post Tell Their Stories
Schumer Panics As 'Morning Joe' Host Betrays His Voter ID Narrative
Even Her Own Voters Can't Stand Her: Kamala's Book Tour Stop in Richmond,...
Dress-Wearing 'Antifa General Kyle' Who Called on People to Doxx and Even KILL...

'#MeToo is dead': Susan Faludi and fellow Real Feminists™ are in full-on 'panicked backpedaling' mode to rewrite history on #BelieveAllWomen

Tara Reade’s sexual assault allegations against Joe Biden have forced a lot of supposed feminists to confront what it means to be a feminist and #MeToo advocate. And by “confront,” we mean, of course, “redefine.”

Advertisement

Celebrated feminist journalist and author Susan Faludi took to the New York Times’ opinion section to do just that:

The whole thing is decidedly ridiculous, but this excerpt seems pretty representative of Faludi’s fundamental unseriousness:

Feminism has, indeed, believed many things about “all women.” That all women are deserving of equal treatment under the law, equal pay in the workplace, reproductive health, freedom from domestic violence. And feminists have long held that “all women” should be believed when the “all” refers to all categories of women — i.e., equal regardless of race, religion or economic status. This is what Anita Hill meant when she said in a CNN town hall in 2017, “And until we can believe all women, every woman’s voice has value, none of us really will be seen as equal.” Read her comments in full, and it’s clear she wasn’t giving equal credence to every individual woman, but equal standing to women of “all races, all ages, all sizes, all backgrounds.”

Advertisement

Good luck finding any feminist who thinks we should believe everything all women say — even what they say about sexual assault. History offers ample evidence of the horrors that can ensue when a woman or a man is believed who shouldn’t be: Remember the Scottsboro Boys?

Since at least the late ’90s, gotcha conservativism’s specialty has been condemning feminists for failing to live up to their dogmatist label. First, caricature feminists as a bunch of groupthink totalitarians, then accuse them of hypocrisy every time they are not in lock step. But guess what? Feminism has never, for five minutes, been about lock step. If anything, we tend to be at each other’s throats more often than we’re marching in ranks. And that’s on subjects from comparable worth to women in combat to pornography to #MeToo, where feminists from Margaret Atwood to yours truly have argued for proportion and due process. The broad spectrum of opinion within feminism is one of its strengths, not a frailty. If feminists see distinctions between Anita Hill, Monica Lewinsky, Christine Blasey Ford and Tara Reade, I’d say they’re doing their jobs. That’s not hypocrisy, that’s integrity.

Oh, OK.

Advertisement

Suuuuuure it hasn’t.

There’s some serious gaslighting in progress.

“A” for effort.

Advertisement

Does all that spinning make you dizzy, Jill? Maybe you should lie down before you hurt yourself.

And memory-holing:

Welp.

Duly noted.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement