Guy’s Insane Rittenhouse Tweet Gets Community Note Treatment
Just Gets WORSE: Detailed Critique of Claudine Gay's Admin History BEFORE Becoming Harvard...
Dude, You're NOT God: Fauci's Comments About Why He Stopped 'Practicing' Catholicism Are...
Bill Maher Throws SERIOUS Shade at Crime-Ridden Blue Cities With His Bit on...
HA! Marc Elias Learns JUST How Sick of His Shiznit People Are After...
REEE *Breathes* REEE *Gasps*! Here are some of the BEST Meltdowns Over Alex...
Cori Bush Out-Stupids Even AOC (No Small Feat!) Trying to Shame MO for...
He's Back: Elon Musk Reinstates Alex Jones
Smoking GUN: Leaked, Woke AF 2020 Memo from Harvard Pres. Claudine Gay Exposes...
College Professors Sure Do Have a Problem With Whiteness
Shiela Jackson Lee Loses Houston Mayoral Race
'Journalist' Shows Leaked Image of Shani Louk Being Used as a Human Shield...
President Biden Says He's Delivering on His Vision of High-Speed Rail
We Regret to Inform You the ‘Experts’ Are at It Again
Author Claims That the United States 'Does Not Have a Right to Exist'

Jonathan Chait makes compelling (read: horrendously awful) case for ignoring Tara Reade's allegations against Joe Biden

As Twitchy told you, New York Times opinion columnist Michelle Goldberg tied herself into quite the intellectual pretzel with a piece attempting to explain that ackshually, Christine Blasey Ford’s case against Brett Kavanaugh was a lot stronger than Tara Reade’s case against Joe Biden and Tara Reade isn’t necessarily a liar but let’s face it, she’s probably lying.


Not to be outdone, New York Magazine’s Jonathan Chait took Goldberg’s take and ran with it:

Chait writes:

Here’s the devilish thing about this Schrödinger’s cat scenario. In the version of reality in which Biden did assault Reade, we can at least debate the justice of throwing him off the ticket. In the version of reality in which he didn’t assault her, it would be a serious miscarriage of justice.

All the writers now urging this were fervent Biden opponents during the primary. None of them seem to have considered that the overwhelming majority of Democrats who voted for him might be upset over denying the nominee they picked over something he may or may not have done in 1993. Indeed, none of them seem even remotely troubled at the prospect of the party elite functionally disenfranchising its own electorate.

The point at which their argument gets around to the question of replacing the hated Biden is where the mechanics of their proposal break down completely. Replacing Kavanaugh was straightforward. He was selected by a single person. Biden was nominated by a lengthy, almost absurdly complex, and essentially democratic process.

Had Reade told her story several months earlier, Democratic voters might have chosen a different nominee. In the meantime, the only mechanism to pick the nominee that is either practical or legitimate is the process we had: the actual votes of Democrats, who very clearly and deliberately decided to nominate Joe Biden.


Ah! So, basically, we can’t even entertain the idea that Joe Biden assaulted Tara Reade because it would mess with the election and ain’t nobody got time for that.

And that’s not even touching on Chait’s take on Christine Blasey Ford vs. Tara Reade:


Again, we’re in no position to know for sure whether Tara Reade’s allegations against Joe Biden are true. But it at least seems safe to say at this point that firefighters like Chait have a vested interest in downplaying those allegations.


Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Twitchy Videos