Mod Fraud: Jessica Tarlov Tries to Rebrand NYC DSA Member AOC As a...
New York DSA to Illegal Aliens: ‘You Don’t Have to Have Papers to...
Dems (Led by Bakari Sellers) Remain Obsessed With Nikki Haley’s Name and She’s...
Joe Scarborough Shocked Anti-Semitic DSA Co-Chair Wanted to Attend Hamas Rally After Oct...
WNBA Player’s 'White Privilege' Tweet After Flagrant Foul Suddenly Has Nothing to Do...
Lawsuit Seeks to Prevent Rumored Somali Gang Shootout at Minnesota State Fair
'Sacred Right to Seize Homes - or It's Over': Mamdani Aide Drops Mask,...
Francesca Hong Explains That Toxic White Supremacy Is Ingrained in This Country's History
Surgical Strife: Seattle City Council Approves Taxpayer Money for ‘Trans Refugee’ Sex Chan...
Sports Illustrated Changes Its Headline About Sophie Cunningham and ‘Karma’ After Backlash
Joe Scarborough Snaps on 'Morning Joe' Over Democrat Socialists
Cheese Wheel of Fortune: Italian Parmesan Banks Face Economic Meltdown Due to Extreme...
Fauci’s Secret Texts: 'Shot Might Cause Miscarriages'… yet Told Pregnant Women It Was...
Greasy Gavin Newsom Comes Up With a New Label for Himself to Try...
We Don't DO THAT Here! Justine Bateman DOG-WALKS Abdul El-Sayed and ALL Sharia...
Premium

Disgraced ex-Rep. Katie Hill isn't convinced that Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell will take their oath to 'do impartial justice' seriously (unlike Senate Dems)

Disgraced ex-Rep. Katie Hill isn’t in any position to play a role in Donald Trump’s impeachment — you know, since she’s a disgraced ex-rep. — but that’s not stopping her from self-righteously weighing in anyway:

Hill cites an “analysis” by CNN’s Zachary B. Wolf for evidence that we all need to be very concerned about Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham’s ability to take their oath seriously:

At least two Republicans, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, have said they aren’t impartial jurors in this process. McConnell is coordinating with the White House about a trial strategy and Graham has also given input. “I’m not an impartial juror,” McConnell told reporters the day before the House impeachment vote. “This is a political process. There is not anything judicial about it. Impeachment is a political decision.”

It’s awkward, then, that McConnell and every other senator, according to Article 1 of the Constitution, shall “be on oath or affirmation” when they try impeachments.

Is there a difference between being “an impartial juror,” which McConnell says he’s not, and doing “impartial justice according to the Constitution,” which he will presumably swear to do?

Yeah, how dare McConnell say outright that he’s not an impartial juror. He should’ve just taken a cue from his Democratic colleagues instead:

And Lord knows Adam Schiff, AOC, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, et al. were totally impartial throughout the House’s portion of this circus.

But aside from that, even, the notion of Hill up there on her high horse suggesting that Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham are ethically challenged is pretty hilarious considering what she did to become a disgraced ex-rep. We know there was nothing in the oath she swore that said “I will not have sexual relations with my subordinates,” but we thought that was pretty much understood.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement