Hasan Piker Joins the NYT to Talk About ‘Microlooting’ as Political Protest
Howard Kurtz: The Kash Patel ‘Scandal’ Would Have Been a Two-Day Story Had...
RFK Jr. Absolutely Torches Sen. Warnock: 'One Person Can Handle 1-3 Rabies Cases...
Here's a Classic Earth Day Flashback of Greg Gutfeld Giving Tugboat Phil a...
With Kash Patel Closing in on the SPLC, Judiciary Dems Want Him to...
ACLU Says DC Curfew Puts Kids at Risk of Unnecessary Encounters With Police
All Is Halted! Virginia Judge Declares Narrow Redistricting Vote Unconstitutional, Blocks...
The Polite Right's Fatal Flaw – DeSantis and Rufo Show How to Fix...
Rumor: The Talarico Camp Is Sitting on Career-Ending Dirt on Both Paxton and...
Reporter Asks Ilhan Omar About Her Curious Financial 'Adjustment' (Brace for Smug Head...
Sen. Chris Murphy Loses It Over Trump Sending 1,000 Afghan 'Heroes' to the...
Welcome to Advanced Mathematics, With Your Guest Lecturer ... The View's Sunny Hostin?
Trump Just Did Something for Veterans That the FDA Refused to do for...
Sen. Patty Murray Hasn't Heard a Single Dem Say Defund ICE (Let's Help...
Big L for Newsom: 9th Circuit Halts CA's ICE Unmasking Law as Unconstitutional
Premium

Disgraced ex-Rep. Katie Hill isn't convinced that Lindsey Graham and Mitch McConnell will take their oath to 'do impartial justice' seriously (unlike Senate Dems)

Disgraced ex-Rep. Katie Hill isn’t in any position to play a role in Donald Trump’s impeachment — you know, since she’s a disgraced ex-rep. — but that’s not stopping her from self-righteously weighing in anyway:

Hill cites an “analysis” by CNN’s Zachary B. Wolf for evidence that we all need to be very concerned about Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham’s ability to take their oath seriously:

At least two Republicans, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, have said they aren’t impartial jurors in this process. McConnell is coordinating with the White House about a trial strategy and Graham has also given input. “I’m not an impartial juror,” McConnell told reporters the day before the House impeachment vote. “This is a political process. There is not anything judicial about it. Impeachment is a political decision.”

It’s awkward, then, that McConnell and every other senator, according to Article 1 of the Constitution, shall “be on oath or affirmation” when they try impeachments.

Is there a difference between being “an impartial juror,” which McConnell says he’s not, and doing “impartial justice according to the Constitution,” which he will presumably swear to do?

Yeah, how dare McConnell say outright that he’s not an impartial juror. He should’ve just taken a cue from his Democratic colleagues instead:

And Lord knows Adam Schiff, AOC, Rashida Tlaib, Ilhan Omar, et al. were totally impartial throughout the House’s portion of this circus.

But aside from that, even, the notion of Hill up there on her high horse suggesting that Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham are ethically challenged is pretty hilarious considering what she did to become a disgraced ex-rep. We know there was nothing in the oath she swore that said “I will not have sexual relations with my subordinates,” but we thought that was pretty much understood.

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement