Jake Tapper REKT for Going STRAIGHT-UP Fake News Helping Dems Lie About Jan....
Democrats Whine Fest Against Clarence Thomas Ends in Epic 'Womp-Womp' Defeat
New Jersey Teachers Now Free to Be as Illiterate as Their Students
Democrats in a Huff Because Merrick Garland Was Too Slow to Unleash Legal...
Biden's Block Of Nippon Deal Leaves Uncertain Future for US Steel
Lawyer UP, Bro! Adam Schiff GUSHING Over Justice and Trump's Sentencing Goes REALLY...
JD Vance Just Needs One PRICELESS Tweet to Humiliate Joe Biden for Giving...
Harry Sisson Says Everything Has Gotten Worse Since Trump Won SOOO X Breaks...
John Harwood Just Keeps Proving He's a Boil on the Butt of Humanity
Take the L! Former Union Stooge Explains How Trump Didn't REALLY 'Win' in...
NEW Footage of Cybertruck Explosion From Different Angle Raises Even More DAMNING Question...
California Bleeding: The Golden State Scores Dead Last for Growth for Fifth Year...
X Marks the Scott! Jennings Attaches ‘Community Note’ to Democrat’s Lie in Real...
Months-Long Transition Fertile Ground for Lame Duck President Biden to Plant Seeds of...
Scott Presler Delivered Pennsylvania for Trump but Can He Sway John Fetterman to...

'Alexa, how does the judicial branch work?' Prog groups want Brett Kavanaugh to recuse himself from upcoming SCOTUS case because he has an opinion

Next year, the Supreme Court is set to hear a case on the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and that’s apparently a problem for some progressive groups. You know, because Brett Kavanaugh (of course). See, Kavanaugh has gone on the record in the past with opinions about the CFPB that these groups don’t agree with.

Advertisement

More from CNBC:

“We call on Justice Kavanaugh to recuse himself from hearing a case on which he has already made up his mind,” the groups — Demand Justice, Demand Progress Education Fund, the Revolving Door Project and Allied Progress — wrote in a statement.

“The law clearly states that judges should recuse themselves when their impartiality might reasonably be questioned. Brett Kavanaugh has already ruled on the underlying legal question in this case. He cannot plausibly claim to be open to arguments from both sides,” they wrote.

In an opinion for a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in 2016, Kavanaugh wrote that the “concentration of massive, unchecked power in a single Director marks a dramatic departure from settled historical practice and makes the CFPB unique among independent agencies.”

The full court overturned his decision two years later, prompting Kavanaugh to pen a dissent that reiterated his belief that the agency’s structure was unconstitutional. That case is known as PHH Corp. v. CFPB.

“In PHH, Kavanaugh offered a more than 70 page long dissent which he told the Senate constituted one of the most ‘significant constitutional opinions’ of his judicial career,” the groups said. “Kavanaugh’s personal reputational interest in seeing that bitter dissent against a bipartisan majority be vindicated by the Supreme Court is considerable.”

Advertisement

They really are hell-bent on getting their revenge on Brett Kavanaugh because he dares to exist.

Apparently they do not.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement