David Frum Says Calling Liz Cheney a Warmonger Is Trump Code for ‘I...
Feel the JOY! Watch Man Who Supports Kamala Spout AWFUL Things at MAGA...
Senator Rick Scott Trolls His Democratic Opponent with Basic Spelling Lessons
Rachel Bitecofer Warns Men That Trump Is Coming for Their P*rn
'What Hippies Used to Say': Bill Maher Defends Donald Trump's Remarks on 'Warhawk'...
Jason Kelce Handily Shuts Down a Big Mouth Troll After Brother Travis is...
Folksy Tim Walz Gives Metrosexual Barack Obama a Flannel Shirt as a Gift
Dairy State Dispatch: Mark Halperin Says Kamala Harris Is in TROUBLE in Wisconsin
Tim Walz Refers to Elon Musk as ‘That Gay Guy’ at Rally
Joe Biden Reveals What He Really Wants to Do to Republicans 'BUTT' He...
New Trump Ad Just Dropped: Kamala Admits Cost of Food Is Too High...
Ana Navarro Posts Shocking Video of Donald Trump Performing a Sex Act on...
'Unity!' Team Trump Responds Perfectly to Harris Campaign's Final Ad Before the Election
Kamala Promises to Fix the Housing Crisis She Helped Create by Allowing Unfettered...
The Keystone Countdown: Salena Zito Brings Perspective to Pennsylvania Politics

'Covering for a liar': NYT goes to bat hard for Elizabeth Warren, attempts to shame Washington Free Beacon for doing actual journalism

As Twitchy told you earlier, MSNBC managed to address the current controversy surrounding Elizabeth Warren’s apparent lie about getting fired for being “visibly pregnant” by swallowing EMILY’s List VP of comms Christina Reynolds’ BS explanation for Warren’s evolving narrative.

Advertisement

The New York Times has essentially decided to follow suit, gathering as many water-carrying buckets as they can in order to defend Warren from the Washington Free Beacon’s journalism:

The New York Times is a lot more concerned about the Washington Free Beacon’s reporting undermining Elizabeth Warren’s narrative than they are about Elizabeth Warren undermining Elizabeth Warren’s narrative. Pathetic.

The entire piece basically does Elizabeth Warren’s dirty work for her, making her out to be the victim of a discriminatory policy as opposed to the perpetrator of yet another lie to perpetuate her victimhood narrative.

Advertisement

(That’s a rhetorical question, of course.)

Advertisement

Sounds about right.

It’s honestly hard to argue with that assessment.

Last word to the Free Beacon:

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement