Sheer Panda-monium in China: Taizhou Zoo Unveils Unique New 'Panda Exhibit'
Politico: ‘Swagger’ Was Once Journalism’s Calling Card
AGHamilton Shares Poignant and Personal Insight into the Jewish Experience After October 7
Brian Krassenstein Tries to White Knight for Kathy Hochul After Racist Computer Remark
Randi Weingarten Horrified by School Closures - In Gaza
John Fetterman Should Be Awarded Ownership of TikTok After this Sick Twitter Burn
Politico: Biden Administration Holding Up Delivery of Bombs to Israel to Send a...
John Kirby Says You Can't Eliminate Hamas Through Military Operations
Kristi Noem and Fox Host Engage in Heated Verbal Sparring Match About her...
What Could POSSIBLY Go Wrong?! Denver Sets Up Hotline for Residents to Host...
Biden: Not Only Did Illegal Immigrants Build This Country, They’re Also Model Citizens
One of Biden's Illegal Immigrants Picked the Wrong State to Terrorize a Young...
WOMP WOMP: Jeff Bezos Invested $60 MILLION in Florida Lab-Grown Meat Before DeSantis...
Northwestern Teaching Assistant Blames 'the Jews' for the Latest Crop of Anti-Semites
Donald Trump's Classified Documents Case Delayed 'Indefinitely'

NYT executive editor Dean Baquet's pathetic attempt at headline damage control still won't be enough for the Outrage Mob

As Twitchy told you, the New York Times caved to the mob and changed a headline that wasn’t sufficiently harsh on Donald Trump:

Advertisement

Evidently the potential loss of Joan Walsh and Beto O’Rourke as subscribers was just too high a price to pay for a straightforward and accurate headline about Trump’s remarks. New York Times’ executive editor Dean Baquet is still out there trying to do damage control:

Really dodged a bullet.

More from the Daily Beast:

It was written on deadline and when it was passed along for approval we all saw it was a bad headline and changed it pretty quickly,” Baquet texted The Daily Beast on Tuesday morning as critics continued to vent their outrage on social media.

Baquet, for his part, texted: “I understand the concern people have. Headlines matter. But I hope they read the coverage, which I will argue was strong.”

If they had read the coverage, they would’ve seen that it was hardly the egregious pro-Trump lovefest they had made it out to be:

Advertisement

All the same, though, the New York Times will have to tread lightly going forward. They wouldn’t want to get busted for another horrific “error”:

Baquet declined to respond on the record to questions concerning how this error specifically occurred, how the Times will avoid such mistakes in the future, and various critics’ claims that this is only the latest in a series of missteps in the paper’s political and Trump-world coverage.

Oh well. At least in trying to make excuses for a headline that never should’ve been controversial in the first place, Baquet is ensuring that the mob will respect the New York Times going forward.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement