Quibbles and Brits: Jimmy Kimmel Tells UK Viewers That America’s a Hotbed of...
Terror Plot Exposed: Somali-Backed Jihadist Planned to Crash Plane into Atlanta High-Rise
Ghost Daycares, No Kids, Millions Vanished: Nick Shirley's Bombshell Probe into Minnesota'...
From Grinch to Hero: Jets Reverse Course, Let Fan Kick for $100K After...
Tragic 'Nickelodeon Effect': Tylor Chase in Sad State – Viral Videos and Jackets...
Exposed: Rep. Ilhan Omar's Dad – Siad Barre Colonel Linked to Isaaq Genocide,...
Bidens Celebrate 'Hope' with New Great-Grandson, Continue Shunning Hunter's Child Navy
Debbie Wasserman Schultz Tries Out New Dem Attack Line on Deportations: 'We Can't...
Obama Presidential Center Explains What the Mocked Building Design Is Supposed to Represen...
Jimmy Kimmel's Humiliating Christmas Tantrum Gets Dwarfed by Trump
Harry Sisson Proudly Shows the World How Broken He Is With His TDS...
'What a Monster'! NY Times Shredded Again for Spin on What Trump's Christmas...
ANOTHER Rhode Island Dem Tried Playing the 'Do You Know Who I Am'...
WOW: Minnesota Lt Governor Peggy Flanagan Takes Somali-PANDERING to a Whole New Level...
Lefties Sink to Sick, New Low Sexualizing Eight-Year-Old on Christmas to Attack Trump

NYT executive editor Dean Baquet's pathetic attempt at headline damage control still won't be enough for the Outrage Mob

As Twitchy told you, the New York Times caved to the mob and changed a headline that wasn’t sufficiently harsh on Donald Trump:

Advertisement

Evidently the potential loss of Joan Walsh and Beto O’Rourke as subscribers was just too high a price to pay for a straightforward and accurate headline about Trump’s remarks. New York Times’ executive editor Dean Baquet is still out there trying to do damage control:

Really dodged a bullet.

More from the Daily Beast:

It was written on deadline and when it was passed along for approval we all saw it was a bad headline and changed it pretty quickly,” Baquet texted The Daily Beast on Tuesday morning as critics continued to vent their outrage on social media.

Baquet, for his part, texted: “I understand the concern people have. Headlines matter. But I hope they read the coverage, which I will argue was strong.”

If they had read the coverage, they would’ve seen that it was hardly the egregious pro-Trump lovefest they had made it out to be:

Advertisement

All the same, though, the New York Times will have to tread lightly going forward. They wouldn’t want to get busted for another horrific “error”:

Baquet declined to respond on the record to questions concerning how this error specifically occurred, how the Times will avoid such mistakes in the future, and various critics’ claims that this is only the latest in a series of missteps in the paper’s political and Trump-world coverage.

Oh well. At least in trying to make excuses for a headline that never should’ve been controversial in the first place, Baquet is ensuring that the mob will respect the New York Times going forward.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement