Scott Jennings Stumps Paul Begala by Challenging Him to Name One ‘Journo’ Who...
Fascist’s Fury: Dem Chris Murphy Vows to Use Government Might Against Companies Dems...
From Human Traffickers to Terrorists: The Convict Parents of the Left’s Loudest ‘Anti-Rich...
Homophobia Is Bad … Except When It’s Against Conservatives: Kimmel’s Cringe WHCD Stand-In...
Is This Photo Purporting to Show Trump Fast Asleep in the WH Real...
Falklands Fallout: US Tells Britain to 'Falk Off' After Iran Snub – Piers...
Rep. Brandon Gill Blows Up Spectrum’s Scooter Love Story: Rep. Min’s Real Reason...
We Are So Back: DOJ Revives Firing Squad as 'Most Dignified' Execution Method
Hasan Piker: Trust-Fund Trotsky Who Encourages Felonies While Melting Down Over His My...
Cory Booker Is Worried Trump Will Seize Media Control Now That Democrats Are...
The Blind Spot: Blue Collar Workers Fund Comfortable Bureaucrats, Then Get Lectures on...
Chris Cuomo: DOJ Is ‘Helping the Bad Guys’ by Targeting the SPLC for...
FINALLY! WaPo Announces Bernie Sanders' New Initiative to Reach Leftists on College Campus...
This Damning Segment on the SPLC Is Just 1 Reason Dems Are Melting...
NASA’s Missing Scientists Mystery Is Getting Way Too Real

'This is super gross': Slate writer torched for her 'offensively terrible' take on Pete Buttigieg's white male gayness

We already know that gay conservatives aren’t allowed to be a thing. But according to Slate’s Christina Cauterucci, for one, gay liberals can be problematic as well. If they’re white males, that is. According to Cauterucci, it’s great that Pete Buttigieg is gay and all, but the fact that he’s an educated white male ultimately means he’s the wrong kind of gay:

Advertisement

Here’s Cauterucci’s definitive conclusion:

To me, a queer woman, it seems hard to argue that the presidential run of this apotheosis of respectability politics is a major win for diversity. Buttigieg’s perception of queer sexuality as a not-sinful but ultimately unimportant distinction—“like having brown hair,” his coming-out essay said—doesn’t make him less gay. It does, however, put some distance between him and the queer communities he’s getting credit for being the first to represent. And if I’m being cynical (or just honest), it probably makes him more electable.

Straight white male voters will likely find it easier to see themselves in Buttigieg than in the women or people of color in the 2020 field. They’ll be right to do so: Buttigieg’s life experiences—how he’s been perceived, how he’s gotten paid, what he’s believed himself capable of, what opportunities have been available to him—almost certainly have far more in common with those of Sanders and Biden than those of Harris, Booker, and Warren. That’s not to say he won’t face challenges and stereotypes specific to his sexuality, or that he hasn’t overcome obstacles he’s chosen not to share. Homophobia still exists. As Buttigieg has correctly pointed out in town halls and interviews, LGBTQ people can still legally be fired for the mere fact of their identity in most U.S. states. But in a primary for the overwhelmingly pro-gay Democratic Party, Buttigieg can be more accurately lumped in with his white male peers than with anyone else.

Advertisement

Heh.

Absolutely nothing. But there’s definitely something wrong with Cauterucci’s take, which is why she’s taking heat from all sides:

Advertisement

Ain’t identity politics grand?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement