The Resistance, Distilled: Man Attacks a Doll Because JK Rowling Still Won’t Pretend...
On the 25th Anniversary of 9/11, Treacherous Duo Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib...
WI 'Political' Journo Deletes UGLY Posts About Tom Tiffany's Emergency Water Landing (Got...
Sen. Ron Johnson Brings Further Evidence of Virus Cover-Up
'Birthing Person' Jones Tried to Smear XX-XY's Jennifer Sey and It Was a...
DeSantis Comments on Suggestion of Democrat AI Oversight
Hasan Piker: El-Sayed’s Heartfelt 9/11 Tribute Was Scripted Because He ‘Can’t Say the...
Abdul El-Sayed Needed Hasan Piker for His Senate Primary ... Now He Has...
Hasan Piker Was 10 on 9/11 ... He Still Claims Mocking It Is...
Pete Buttigieg’s Fix for a ‘Nakedly Partisan’ Court: Add Six Seats and Hope...
Lindsay Clancy's Attorneys’ Wife Has a Big Mouth and Says LOTS of Stupid...
Drunk or Just NUTS? YOU Decide! CEO Brutally Calls Amy Acton OUT Over...
God Was Watching Over Us: WI Gubernatorial Candidate Tom Tiffany Safe After Emergency...
Talarico HOAX: FCC Chair Brendan Carr Schooling University Dems on 'Equal Time' Is...
Old, Leftist, White Woman Strikes AGAIN! Another Clancy Juror Has Some 'Splainin' to...

'This is super gross': Slate writer torched for her 'offensively terrible' take on Pete Buttigieg's white male gayness

We already know that gay conservatives aren’t allowed to be a thing. But according to Slate’s Christina Cauterucci, for one, gay liberals can be problematic as well. If they’re white males, that is. According to Cauterucci, it’s great that Pete Buttigieg is gay and all, but the fact that he’s an educated white male ultimately means he’s the wrong kind of gay:

Advertisement

Here’s Cauterucci’s definitive conclusion:

To me, a queer woman, it seems hard to argue that the presidential run of this apotheosis of respectability politics is a major win for diversity. Buttigieg’s perception of queer sexuality as a not-sinful but ultimately unimportant distinction—“like having brown hair,” his coming-out essay said—doesn’t make him less gay. It does, however, put some distance between him and the queer communities he’s getting credit for being the first to represent. And if I’m being cynical (or just honest), it probably makes him more electable.

Straight white male voters will likely find it easier to see themselves in Buttigieg than in the women or people of color in the 2020 field. They’ll be right to do so: Buttigieg’s life experiences—how he’s been perceived, how he’s gotten paid, what he’s believed himself capable of, what opportunities have been available to him—almost certainly have far more in common with those of Sanders and Biden than those of Harris, Booker, and Warren. That’s not to say he won’t face challenges and stereotypes specific to his sexuality, or that he hasn’t overcome obstacles he’s chosen not to share. Homophobia still exists. As Buttigieg has correctly pointed out in town halls and interviews, LGBTQ people can still legally be fired for the mere fact of their identity in most U.S. states. But in a primary for the overwhelmingly pro-gay Democratic Party, Buttigieg can be more accurately lumped in with his white male peers than with anyone else.

Advertisement

Heh.

Absolutely nothing. But there’s definitely something wrong with Cauterucci’s take, which is why she’s taking heat from all sides:

Advertisement

Ain’t identity politics grand?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement