Nowhere is it written that you have to be a fan of Donald Trump or his tweets, but if you want to criticize them, you should probably try a better approach than Sarah Silverman’s.
A day after Trump took a swing at Amy Klobuchar:
Well, it happened again. Amy Klobuchar announced that she is running for President, talking proudly of fighting global warming while standing in a virtual blizzard of snow, ice and freezing temperatures. Bad timing. By the end of her speech she looked like a Snowman(woman)!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 10, 2019
Here’s how Sarah Silverman responded:
Wow … where to even begin?
If I'm remembering the rules correctly, this is transphobic. https://t.co/W9It9HQJdb
— F. Bill McMorris (@FBillMcMorris) February 12, 2019
That’s the least of her tweet’s problems.
?♂️
Excuse me. Can someone explain the balls touching water insult?
I don't get it. https://t.co/jmU3ADlFOx
— RBe (@RBPundit) February 12, 2019
I’m still trying to wrap my head around the idea that she has enough experience with the aroma/odor of “penis holes” to establish a scale.
Ugh.
— Waiting for Baseball (@deckacards) February 12, 2019
We’re trying not to think about it. We’d much rather think about this:
Mind blowingly stupid you say? pic.twitter.com/lwLNy96iDJ
— Ordy's Amish School of Coding (@OrdyPackard) February 12, 2019
Never gets old. The same can’t be said for Sarah’s schtick, unfortunately.
You are a true intellectual giant. A national treasure. Classy and smart. Eloquent and restrained. I'm richer for living in your world. March on, Prof. Dr. @SarahKSilverman.
— Gad Saad (@GadSaad) February 12, 2019
Stay classy, Sarah.
— WeirdRalph (@weirdralph) February 12, 2019
Surely this will stop Trump. Well done.
— Russell Powell (@RuscoPColtrane) February 12, 2019
Join the Conversation
VIP members get the ability to comment on articles.