The news that Donald Trump killed the Iran Deal had people asking a very important question:
Has Jennifer Rubin sent a contradicting tweet about the Iran deal yet?
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) May 8, 2018
She sure has!
— David Harsanyi (@davidharsanyi) May 8, 2018
And how!
there is zero explanation how we are supposed to get the better deal now. Iran has its money, our allies are in the deal and its economy is better now than before. If Iran resumes we are faced with either war or countenancing
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
UN Ambassador Nikki Haley on Iran Deal: "This was a terrible deal that only allowed Iran’s bad international conduct to worsen. We must never allow Iran to get nuclear weapons, and we must resist their support for terrorism that continues to threaten America and our allies."
— Meet the Press (@MeetThePress) May 8, 2018
Saying it is a terrible deal is not a policy. What leverage do we have now? None.
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
Bolton now clarifies that there will be a wind down provision of around 6 months to phase out & wind down business in Iran. That suggests European allies will get grace period.
— margaret brennan (@margbrennan) May 8, 2018
that's not a clarification that is another reversal/glaring error
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
Well, Jennifer Rubin is certainly an expert when it comes to reversals:
https://twitter.com/seanmdav/status/993930030135857152
Hmm…. pic.twitter.com/n5h17LwKGs
— Whiskey Jack (@Wisakijak) May 8, 2018
Ah yes, you've been ~very~ consistent on this pic.twitter.com/GfB4gvBNp1
— Michael Shapiro (@mis2127) May 8, 2018
You were saying? pic.twitter.com/1QLt7d6QGe
— William Foster (@RConrad62) May 8, 2018
My oh My. This Blog didn't age to well. Lol. pic.twitter.com/b8ACjOordJ
— Ms Maxwell ? ? ? (@MsMaxwell6) May 8, 2018
Whoops.
Saying the deal is bad is not a policy. That's the Trump team's egregious lack of strategic thinking.
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
where is the plan to do something better?
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
And will we have any inspections? Doesn't seem like it. Almost seems like Bibi is manipulating a dense, ignorant US president toward a military option
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
Huh?? When they are not in the Fox News cocoon it becomes apparent how incoherent, ill-planned this whole mess is
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
So we are much better off. Oh, wait. Hmm.
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
correct. he has no idea what is in it. We're letting a 3 year old rip up deals he doesn't understand
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
Which we have no way of obtaining since we acted unilaterally. None of this suggests a coherent plan
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
What was coherent about Obama’s plan?
or what? we'll sanction our allies? Does Grenell even know if that is our policy?
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
Does Rubin even know what her own policy is?
I obviously didnt support the Iran deal but I see no better/coherent strategy. We give up what we did get and Iran walks away with cheshire cat grin
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
If she “obviously didn’t support the Iran Deal,” then why is she so bent out of shape that it’s dead? Oh. Because she’s a flaming hack.
First, Iran is in the catbird’s seat. It negotiated with the Obama administration the release of billions of dollars in funds that had been frozen under the sanctions regimen and disabled the international alliance on sanctions https://t.co/fIySus7nCr
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
whether our allies will now cooperate with this on nonnuclear matters including sanctions for Iran’s ballistic missile program and its support for terrorism is an open question. https://t.co/fIySus7nCr
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
the administration’s total inability to plan ahead is on full display. Will we exempt allies from newly imposed sanctions? Do we have a military plan— and if so, will allies join with us after we have backed out of the deal? How will we enforce sanctions? https://t.co/fIySurPMdR
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
If its intention all along has been to substitute a military solution for the JCPOA, it will find itself isolated internationally and, fairly or not, be blamed for the outbreak of hostilities. https://t.co/fIySus7nCr
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
the Israeli prime minister’s role in provoking the end of the JCPOA and any military encounter that follows would severely strain U.S.-Israel relations. https://t.co/fIySus7nCr
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
Trump and GOP lawmakers who supported this move now own the results. If Iran moves closer to a bomb, if it makes a quick dash for a bomb, if military action ensues, https://t.co/fIySus7nCr
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
Oh, bullsh*t. Iran never had any intention of honoring their part of any bargain. And Jennifer knows that. Or at least she did. Before she didn’t.
he will shoulder responsibility for this in a way President George W. Bush never did for the Iraq War (which was widely supported by Democrats). https://t.co/fIySus7nCr
— Jennifer Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) May 8, 2018
Meanwhile, we’re still waiting for Rubin to take responsibility for what she’s said. Own your hackery, Jen. We think you’ll find it liberating.
https://twitter.com/JBarnett68/status/993936808139546624
***
Related:
‘Lost your MIND’! Jennifer Rubin’s INSANE Iran Deal-splaining sends jaws CRASHING into floors
Join the conversation as a VIP Member