That sound you hear is the sound of yet another gun control narrative getting royally busted:
Police say the YouTube attacker, who was limited by California law to ten-round magazines, simply changed to a new magazine when her first ran out. https://t.co/o2FJjFkHFZ
— Friendly Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) April 6, 2018
But … but … high-capacity magazine clips! Banning them will totally stop wannabe mass shooters! Don’t tell us that’s not actually how it works!
Wait. Are you telling me that you can actually have more than one magazine of ammunition???? https://t.co/GXGZI4t2LK
— RBe (@RBPundit) April 6, 2018
https://twitter.com/swampbuffalo/status/982273878536765440
Wait, that's allowed? Curses!!!
— Escape from NY (@S_capeFromNY) April 6, 2018
Unpossible. https://t.co/NcpV4l7ba4
— J.R. Salzman (@jrsalzman) April 6, 2018
https://twitter.com/fiona_mccool/status/982257057066762243
https://twitter.com/BobbyHampshire2/status/982294063939371009
— Stephen Miller (@redsteeze) April 6, 2018
Can’t wait to see how California gun grabbers try to prevent this from happening again.
Up next, California bans ownership of more than one magazine & rations bullets. ?
— WinsomeBulldog (@winsomebulldog) April 6, 2018
Recommended
Don’t be giving them any ideas now
— McGee ? (@TheWise_Idiot) April 6, 2018
Oh, they've already thought of it. I've seen more than one person make the suggestion with complete seriousness.
"The only reason to buy lots (read, more than a couple dozen) of bullets is to shoot lots of people!1!!" ?
— WinsomeBulldog (@winsomebulldog) April 6, 2018
Well, in any event, it seems that the YouTube shooting has all but disappeared from the news. Don’t be surprised if that’s because Nasim Aghdam also shot holes in some of gun grabbers’ most cherished narratives.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member