L Is for Lie, Ms. Rachel: Star Slammed for Passing a Biased Report...
AP: Guess the Race of Second Suspect Arrested in Hanging of Black Woman
Shockingly the Network Newscasts Are ALL OVER the ActBlue Foreign Funding Scandal (JUST...
RIP What’s Left of LA: Nithya Raman Takes the Lead Over Karen Bass
Javier Milei Just Destroyed the UN's 'Arrogant Parasites' Off the Top Rope (Right...
CNN’s Jake Tapper Not Going to Dignify Trump’s Juvenile Post About the Brilliant...
Dem. Senate Candidate Begs for Kamala Harris' Help (by Staying FAR Away From...
'Independent' Senate Candidate Dan Osborn Can Champion LGBTQ Issues and Immigration *After...
Video of Abdul El-Sayed Listening to Kamala Harris Gets the Musical Accompaniment It...
Hidden Camera Catches Talarico's Mom Planning Move to DC to Keep Him in...
CNN's Jake Tapper Wonders Why More Conservatives Aren't Defending Legacy Media Against Tru...
WaPo Has ALL the Climate Change Alarmist Bases Covered When It Comes to...
CBS News' Margaret Brennan's Assessment of Iranian Nukes Changes Based on What Trump...
Where's the Love? The View Asks the Single Most Idiotic Question (yet) About...
Bill Burr: Maybe If Healthcare Execs Had Just Listened, Luigi Wouldn’t Have Had...

Forgetting something? MarketWatch serves up 'remarkably stupid' take on restaurant costs

We’re not quite sure how to preface this incredibly hot take from MarketWatch, so we won’t preface it with anything. Instead, we’ll just plop it right here so you can check it out for yourselves:

Advertisement

See what we mean? How do you even begin to introduce something like that?

Like, you don’t even need to be a brilliant economist to know why that’s terrible.

https://twitter.com/TonyGrisafi1/status/980191705768124416

The article, which they for whatever reason decided to reheat after originally publishing it in early April of last year, does mention this:

Advertisement

To be fair, every time you dine at a restaurant, you’re paying for more than just the food. About 30% of restaurant revenue goes to labor costs, 30% goes to general overhead and 30% is spent on the actual ingredients, according to PlateIQ. That means that restaurants still need to mark up ingredients by an average of 300% to break even.

Which raises the question: What was the point of the article? That restaurants charge more for food than the ingredients cost? Because we’re pretty sure everybody already knew that.

We’ll leave you with this:

Oof.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement