The Democrat Big Tent Just Got Bigger: Nazi Tattoos, Fake Doctors, and Now...
Twitch Tantrum: Hasan Piker Brands Fox News Researchers 'Stalkers' for Tuning Into His...
Chris Murphy Went on The View to Again Make It Clear Who He's...
Jaxson Overreaction: The View’s Sunny Hostin Says NFL Star’s Trump Intro Felt Like...
Scott Jennings Reminds Dems on CNN That James Talarico’s Bizarre Beliefs Clash With...
Iran Steals California's Playbook: Strait of Hormuz Tolls Renamed 'Environmental Fees'
Dem Joe Cunningham Says His Party Needs to Talk Less Like Professors and...
Oregon Petition to Ban Hunting and Fishing Reaches Threshold to Be Added to...
‘The Terrorists Are in Control’: Protesters Set Up Barricades Outside ICE Facility
Mark Zaid Honored to Represent Estate of Officer Brian Sicknick in Lawsuit Against...
'Accidental Nazi Tattoo': Zaid Jilani's Platner Defense Ignites Brutal (and Well Deserved)...
Jaguar: 'Watch Us Alienate Our Customers', Ferarri: 'Hold My Chianti'
Dan Bongino Torches Thomas Massie as a Fraudulent Piece of BLEEP
ANOTHER RINO Bites the Dust --> Ken Paxton Defeats John Cornyn Proving Once...
AOC's Former Chief of Staff Implies Creepy Scott Wiener Is 'Another John Fetterman'

Forgetting something? MarketWatch serves up 'remarkably stupid' take on restaurant costs

We’re not quite sure how to preface this incredibly hot take from MarketWatch, so we won’t preface it with anything. Instead, we’ll just plop it right here so you can check it out for yourselves:

Advertisement

See what we mean? How do you even begin to introduce something like that?

Like, you don’t even need to be a brilliant economist to know why that’s terrible.

https://twitter.com/TonyGrisafi1/status/980191705768124416

The article, which they for whatever reason decided to reheat after originally publishing it in early April of last year, does mention this:

Advertisement

To be fair, every time you dine at a restaurant, you’re paying for more than just the food. About 30% of restaurant revenue goes to labor costs, 30% goes to general overhead and 30% is spent on the actual ingredients, according to PlateIQ. That means that restaurants still need to mark up ingredients by an average of 300% to break even.

Which raises the question: What was the point of the article? That restaurants charge more for food than the ingredients cost? Because we’re pretty sure everybody already knew that.

We’ll leave you with this:

Oof.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos