The New York Times has been a major player in the media’s recent slobberfest over North Korea, pushing hot takes like this:
Without a word, only flashing smiles, Kim Jong-un's sister outflanked Vice President Mike Pence in diplomacy https://t.co/c2gTuSTF9e
— The New York Times (@nytimes) February 11, 2018
You’d like to think that after having a day to think about why that piece was flaming garbage, the New York Times would feel some shame and admit that they’d made a huge mistake in publishing it.
You’d like to think that … but that’s not what happened:
https://twitter.com/SteveKopack/status/963122342602969088
https://twitter.com/SteveKopack/status/963122540708233216
https://twitter.com/SteveKopack/status/963122944460447745
Wow.
So, not only are the people complaining about the New York Times’ fawning coverage of North Korea “naive” and “foolish,” but it’s wrong to expect coverage to be comprehensive and honest.
Pfft, context, who needs it?
— bc wallin (@BCWallin) February 12, 2018
Unreal.
https://twitter.com/LDoren/status/963124696752455680
This shouldn’t be difficult, New York Times. And if it is, maybe it’s time to re-evaluate yourself.
https://twitter.com/LDoren/status/963125067742875652
All the news that’s fit to print … except the news that tells the truth.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member