Scott Jennings Rebukes Donna Brazile for Comparing Tea Party Movement to Dem Party’s...
Men Need Purpose at Work — Here’s the Advice I’m Giving My Daughter
From Comedy to Commie: DSA Co-Chair Says Jon Stewart’s ‘The Daily Show’ Was...
Mehdi Hasan Is Still Pretending Hasan Piker’s 9/11 Posturing and Jew-Hatred Are No...
This Legislation Could End Government Shutdowns Once and for All
Sen. Jim Banks Gives Credit to Trade Policies
Abdul El-Sayed Brags That He and His Wife ‘Actually Like Each Other —...
Prez Agency: Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez Says She Hasn’t Ruled Out White House Run In...
'Woke 1 Was Crazy': AOC Tries to Memory-Hole Her Peak Defund-And-Abolish Era
Insane Framing: Sports Illustrated Claims Sophie Cunningham Got a 'Bitter Taste of Karma'
House Leadership: American Security Against Healthcare Costs
AOC Freezes Her Eggs and Films the Shot: The Parturition Will Be Televised...
'Stewardship Is the Issue': HUD Secretary Scott Turner DROPS Reporter Asking About Budget...
This Fear Is REAL: Pramila Jayapal Learns the Hard Way That NO ONE...
LOL, the BOOS! Abigail Spanberger Served Up a BRUTAL Heapin' Helpin' of REALITY...

TOLERANCE! Jason Alexander envisions NASTY fate for climate change heretic Scott Pruitt

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt committed climate change heresy when he had the gall — the gall! — to suggest that climate change isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Advertisement

A breathless Nick Visser writes at the HuffPost:

Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, alluded earlier this week that global warming may be beneficial to humans, once again questioning the world’s leading scientists who have declared the phenomenon one of the greatest known threats to humanity.

In an interview that aired Tuesday on KSNV, a Nevada television station, Pruitt questioned how accurately scientists could predict the planet’s ideal temperature in 2100, or even this year, and said humans had “flourished” in times of past warmth.

“We know humans have most flourished during times of what, warming trends,” Pruitt said during the interview. “I think there’s assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing. Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100, in the year 2018?”

He continued: “That’s fairly arrogant for us to think that we know exactly what it should be in 2100.”

How dare Pruitt point out that climate change is anything but a new phenomenon or suggest that humans don’t have all the answers! The Democrats are just beside themselves with shock and disgust:

Advertisement

Jason Alexander isn’t too pleased, either:

Because tolerance.

Heh.

https://twitter.com/byronic_queero/status/961672660508819456

Or latex sales.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement