Bernie Wonders Why Everything Sucks After Tripling Premiums, Printing Money, and Importing...
Hakeem Jeffries Gets Boxed in: He Might Never Win Again
AOC Says States Like TN Want to 'Wipe Out Every Black Representative' While...
Bill Melugin Schools Democrats: No, Biden Did Fly in Hundreds of Thousands of...
Hakeem Jeffries Makes It Clear His 'Trump Threatens Our Norms and Institutions' BS...
The Left's Meltdown Over the Lincoln Memorial Pool Is a Perfect Reflection ......
John Fetterman's Take on Assassination Attempt Deniers Will Enrage 'Tinfoil Hat Brigade' D...
Ro Khana Trips SPECTACULARLY Over Tim Scott While RANTING About Zero Black South...
Mark Kelly Pulls Out His Shovel and Keeps Digging Over His Classified Info...
Angry Staffer Derps AGAIN! Claims MAGA Influencers Have Super SECRET Chat Where Trump...
MAZE's 'Beautiful, 4-Part Story' Starring Stephen Colbert Is Like a Greek Tragedy Except...
She's Gonna BLOW! Leigh McGowen Suffers Psychotic BREAK on CNN Panel Talking About...
The Bad, the Ugly, the Absolute CORRUPT: HERE Is What Really Went Down...
Holy COPE, Batman! Dolt Morgan J Freeman Uses Grok to 'Prove' Red States...
'Democrats Just Dropped a New Pro-Spencer Pratt Ad' in L.A. (They Say This...

TOLERANCE! Jason Alexander envisions NASTY fate for climate change heretic Scott Pruitt

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt committed climate change heresy when he had the gall — the gall! — to suggest that climate change isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Advertisement

A breathless Nick Visser writes at the HuffPost:

Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, alluded earlier this week that global warming may be beneficial to humans, once again questioning the world’s leading scientists who have declared the phenomenon one of the greatest known threats to humanity.

In an interview that aired Tuesday on KSNV, a Nevada television station, Pruitt questioned how accurately scientists could predict the planet’s ideal temperature in 2100, or even this year, and said humans had “flourished” in times of past warmth.

“We know humans have most flourished during times of what, warming trends,” Pruitt said during the interview. “I think there’s assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing. Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100, in the year 2018?”

He continued: “That’s fairly arrogant for us to think that we know exactly what it should be in 2100.”

How dare Pruitt point out that climate change is anything but a new phenomenon or suggest that humans don’t have all the answers! The Democrats are just beside themselves with shock and disgust:

Advertisement

Jason Alexander isn’t too pleased, either:

Because tolerance.

Heh.

https://twitter.com/byronic_queero/status/961672660508819456

Or latex sales.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement