Jake Tapper Thinks CA’s COVID Response Is Being Used As a Cudgel on...
Boston Herald: Lindsay Clancy Holdout Juror Now Getting the Negative Attention He Deserves
NYPost Looks Into Anthropic CEO's Woke Handpicked AI Watchdog Group
'Shady As F**k': Pro-Talarico Super PAC Finds ‘Roundabout Way of Paying People for...
NYT Blames 'Editing Error' for Saying Israelis See Themselves As the Victims of...
Watching Kash Patel Infuriate Cory Booker (While Getting in a Dig at Schiff)...
Athletic Scholarships Are Scarce. A Well-Rounded Kid Shouldn’t Be the Sacrifice
Chalk Up Another Massive L for Newsom: TMZ Reports That Paramount Is Ditching...
'Probably Nothing!' L.A. Mayor Karen Bass Quit This Board Right Before Today's HUGE...
Kansas Man Arrested by Florida Police Over Alleged Plot to Kill Ben Shapiro...
Stadiums Banned Macklemore After Antisemitic Rants ... Dearborn Mayor Rolls Out the Welcom...
CNN Asks Senate Candidate Dan Osborn to Confirm This Is His Voice Insulting...
Hidden Camera Footage Catches Talarico SuperPAC Paying For Votes
El-Sayed's MI Senate Campaign Got THIS Desperate (and a Media Outlet Was Happy...
Undercover Video: Talarico’s Lesbian Pastor Admits He’s Faking a Makeover to Get Elected...

TOLERANCE! Jason Alexander envisions NASTY fate for climate change heretic Scott Pruitt

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt committed climate change heresy when he had the gall — the gall! — to suggest that climate change isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

Advertisement

A breathless Nick Visser writes at the HuffPost:

Scott Pruitt, the administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, alluded earlier this week that global warming may be beneficial to humans, once again questioning the world’s leading scientists who have declared the phenomenon one of the greatest known threats to humanity.

In an interview that aired Tuesday on KSNV, a Nevada television station, Pruitt questioned how accurately scientists could predict the planet’s ideal temperature in 2100, or even this year, and said humans had “flourished” in times of past warmth.

“We know humans have most flourished during times of what, warming trends,” Pruitt said during the interview. “I think there’s assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing. Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100, in the year 2018?”

He continued: “That’s fairly arrogant for us to think that we know exactly what it should be in 2100.”

How dare Pruitt point out that climate change is anything but a new phenomenon or suggest that humans don’t have all the answers! The Democrats are just beside themselves with shock and disgust:

Advertisement

Jason Alexander isn’t too pleased, either:

Because tolerance.

Heh.

https://twitter.com/byronic_queero/status/961672660508819456

Or latex sales.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement