"What have the Romans ever done for us?" https://t.co/oJFMXacjPe
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) March 6, 2017
Friggin’ Slate, man:
The case for banning white male Americans from America: https://t.co/CbkQKwY2nY pic.twitter.com/1gNShglQK6
— Slate (@Slate) March 6, 2017
Writer Ben Mathis-Lilley thought this was pretty clever:
The following is a brief description, intended for insertion into Section 1(e) of the Presidential Executive Order on Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States, of some of the conditions in the United States that demonstrate why its white, male residents present an urgent security risk to the United States.
Because some acts of terrorism have been carried out by white males. Get it? Get it???
Really, if you go by the order’s own logic—that “it is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks,” and that nationals who “present heightened threats” should be excluded—this is the only logical course of action. We expect that President Trump and his advisers will thus amend Monday’s order as soon as they read this post.
https://twitter.com/WrightBrunoS/status/838853088668700672
You're on meth. It's the only explanation.
— Happy Thanksgiving & Epstein Didn't Kill Himself (@drawandstrike) March 6, 2017
So now its time to put you under the category of bad satire news sites. like the onion. but the onion is kinda funny.
— Kekistani Spec Ops (@KekSpecOps) March 6, 2017
It’s gonna be a loooooong four (or eight) years.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member