Dylan Mulvaney Has a 'Dolls Night Out' With 'Sarah' McBride and the Jokes...
Silly Prison Abolitionist Thinks Cages Are Cruel—Wait Until He Sees What the Pitchforks...
Hunter Biden Blames Trump Family for His Woes While Cursing Them All—Including the...
Mehdi Hasan’s Knickers in a Full Twist After Haley Stevens Tells His Fake-Doctor...
Ketanji Brown Jackson Is Picky About Media Choices to Convey Impartiality (Guess Where...
'What's the Mood on BlueSky?' Host Ken Jennings Hears His Toughest Jeopardy Question...
Streamer Hasan Piker Who Said America Deserved 9/11 Guarantees 2028 Dem Nominee Will...
Legacy Media Outlets Downplay Moroccans Swarming Into Spain, Focus on ‘Right-Wing’ Respons...
White Site: Kamala Harris’s DEI Devotion Ends at Border of Her Swanky New...
Sen. Corey Booker Observes Brian Sicknick Day in New Jersey, Who Gave His...
LBC: Three Migrants Found Dead on Boat in the English Channel; All Women,...
'Now Is the Time to Do What You're Told': MAZE Compiles COVID Fear-Mongering...
Trump Invites Viral Teen Lifeguard Hero to the White House — and Usual...
Madison Is Paying Overtime to Keep CRAZ, the Corey Ruiz Autonomous Zone, Blocked...
Bernie Sanders Asks How ‘Poor’ Mark Zuckerberg Will Survive If CA Passes Wealth...

States? Who needs 'em? WaPo opinion piece offers up solution to America's problems

So many post-election hot takes, it’s hard to keep up. But we’d be remiss if we failed to show this one some special attention:

Advertisement

Oh, this oughtta be good.

Lawrence R. Samuel writes:

But times have changed, and we need to rethink the notion of the “United States of America.” Our states are no longer culturally diverse regions with their own respective identities; rather, they are artificially constructed geographic entities that certainly would not be formed today. Borderlines between states are especially nonsensical. Pensacola, Fla., is a lot more like Mobile, Ala., than Miami. Upstate New Yorkers are less than happy about being in the same tax pool as Manhattanites.

A federation of states was a wonderful idea in the late 18th century, but represents an unnecessary and costly burden in the early 21st. Two layers of government — federal and local — offers a cleaner, more sensible and much more affordable system than our current one, a notion not unlike cutting out the middle layer of an overly bureaucratic, inefficient company. Eliminating this middle layer would save the American people billions of dollars a year, the kind of money that could go a long way toward paying down our national debt or preparing for our looming crises in Social Security and health care.

State affinities will likely never completely disappear, and there is no reason that the University of Florida or the New York Jets could not keep their names (even if the latter plays their games in New Jersey). But it’s time we start thinking of ourselves as one people — Americans — who live in real, local communities rather than as 50 kinds of people living in imaginary regions.

Advertisement

Wow. Hard to process all that brilliance.

https://twitter.com/SonnyBunch/status/798651044184006656

https://twitter.com/SamaDaMana/status/798653123870879744

Good idea.

https://twitter.com/TANSTAAFL23/status/798648948302843905

https://twitter.com/slushstuff/status/798652563562184704

https://twitter.com/fastnerman/status/798652344544022528

Advertisement

On the other hand:

https://twitter.com/DarrenODaly/status/798657905184546816

Fewer syllables? Can’t argue with that.

***

Related:

Good luck with that! Barbara Boxer introducing bill to abolish Electoral College

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement