As Twitchy told you, the New York Post’s editorial board recently published a scathing rebuke of Hillary Clinton, calling her out for claiming that she never told Benghazi victims’ families that the attacks were caused by a video.
The Post tweeted about it:
Liar, liar pantsuit on fire https://t.co/KBoD2GDacC
— New York Post (@nypost) December 10, 2015
Jonathan Allen, former Politico writer and author of the book “HRC,” had a big problem with that. No, not with Hillary lying, but with the word “pantsuit”:
That's not sexist at all. https://t.co/lyGVdgDRnT
— Jonathan Allen (@jonallendc) December 10, 2015
Actually, that’s correct. It’s not sexist. Like, at all.
https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/675028733561020420
@jonallendc Correct, it isn't.
— KeepCalmAndDrawl (@FormerlyFormer) December 10, 2015
@jonallendc You're right, it isn't.
— gloomhauer (@gloomhauer) December 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/MoonbatCatnip/status/675038576346812416
@jonallendc correct. It's not.
— Craig Daliessio (@craigdaliessio) December 10, 2015
Unless Jonathan’s suggesting that Hillary’s the sexist one.
https://twitter.com/JoshsLiveTweets/status/675018273751089153
Indeed. Here she is today, in fact:
It wasn’t always pantsuits and presidential races. Some of Hillary's best #TBT moments: https://t.co/PaBpGpWRbZ pic.twitter.com/ro7EsXFd7T
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) December 10, 2015
Recommended
Are you calling Hillary sexist, Jonathan? Is that what you’re doing?
She sells pantsuit swag in her online store & has made it her trademark. Totally fair game. https://t.co/YkIXjrN1Zc https://t.co/QdnSAtCrTp
— Jonah Goldberg (@JonahDispatch) December 10, 2015
@JonahNRO it's fine to use pantsuit. But since the phrase pants on fire is accurate for someone wearing a pantsuit, why alter it?
— Jonathan Allen (@jonallendc) December 10, 2015
@RobProvince answering you because you Tweet at me a lot: Pants on fire works for someone wearing a pantsuit. Why focus on the pantsuit?
— Jonathan Allen (@jonallendc) December 10, 2015
Um, because it’s funny, Jonathan. And totally appropriate.
https://twitter.com/CFLancop/status/675018125306302464
https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/675029343630938112
@RobProvince @jonallendc @nypost pic.twitter.com/kTQGJfiXmH
— Holden (@Holden114) December 10, 2015
@jonallendc @nypost "pantsuit aficionado" pic.twitter.com/XDKcwajNbW
— matt (@themattjones) December 10, 2015
.@jonallendc Referencing Hillary's pantsuit is sexist? Is she wearing one on the cover of your book that's your background image?
— Anthony Bialy (@AnthonyBialy) December 10, 2015
Oh, you mean this book cover?
That’s very problematic, Jonathan.
Everything is sexist. Everything. pic.twitter.com/eSbn6XnJyt
— BT (@back_ttys) December 10, 2015
https://twitter.com/AndrewBolderin/status/675037282299195396
Not only is he reaching, but his priorities appear to be somewhat … off:
https://twitter.com/Mattfobrien/status/675028883117314048
Extremely pathetic. But not terribly surprising.
https://twitter.com/JammieWF/status/675016997374005248
***
Related:
Brutal: NY Post ed. board shreds Hillary for ‘lowest-down, dirtiest lie of all’
Join the conversation as a VIP Member