Oh, this is good. Like, reeeeeeeally good:
Clinton was just asked if she believes people who claim rape like Juanita Broderick and Kathleen Willey…
— Jennifer Epstein (@jeneps) December 3, 2015
woman asks @HillaryClinton: U recently said all rape victims should be believed. what about Juanita Broaddrick, Kathleen Wiley, Paula Jones?
— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) December 3, 2015
Daaaaang.
Hoo boy https://t.co/6GXuJfLiSo
— Jimmy (@JimmyPrinceton) December 3, 2015
Oh dear https://t.co/C3ldzFkr6q
— SalenaZito (@SalenaZito) December 3, 2015
@jaketapper @HillaryClinton I'm digging this!
— Mad Mark (@TheMadMarkShow) December 3, 2015
Right?
https://twitter.com/Mattfobrien/status/672509329149444096
And what was the answer from @HillaryClinton ? @jaketapper @JammieWF
— MF (@MBFr1tz) December 3, 2015
@jaketapper @HillaryClinton Anxiously waiting to hear her response!
— A Meh Gal ¯_(ツ)_/¯ (@GallSueJoe) December 3, 2015
@jaketapper @HillaryClinton what did she say? 0_o
— Alex Baars (@Alexbaars) December 3, 2015
https://twitter.com/JammieWF/status/672508714650218496
She said this:
Her answer: "I would say that everyone should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence." https://t.co/r0M963SGO2
— Jennifer Epstein (@jeneps) December 3, 2015
.@HillaryClinton response: "Well, I would say that everyone should be believed at first until they are disbelieved based on evidence"
— Jake Tapper (@jaketapper) December 3, 2015
Here’s the video, via The Washington Free Beacon:
Oof.
so she believed Broaddrick's rape allegation against her husband, at least at first? https://t.co/nOE2u2uRaw
— Guy Benson (@guypbenson) December 3, 2015
So in other words Juanita Broderick and all the others should still be believed yes? @jaketapper @HillaryClinton https://t.co/z5fQywH3II
— Simon Templar (@SimonTemplarPV) December 3, 2015
It certainly looks that way.
It also looks like Hillary’s understanding of “innocent until proven guilty” could use a little tune-up.
I'll take "Presumption of Innocence" for $600, Alexhttps://t.co/Buw3X786AT
— David Burge (@iowahawkblog) December 3, 2015
@jaketapper @HillaryClinton what happened to innocent until proven guilty? #DoubleStandards
— J Edgar (@J_Edgar28) December 3, 2015
@jaketapper @JimmyPrinceton @HillaryClinton so much for innocent until proven guilty. Holy hell get Clinton out here. Unfit for POTUS
— UA (@UA1078) December 3, 2015
@SimonTemplarPV @JimRyals @jaketapper @HillaryClinton
Seems she's calling for "guilty until proven innocent"— Baz Jones (@bazyjonesy) December 3, 2015
https://twitter.com/MABlumenfeld/status/672508159441936385
@jaketapper @HillaryClinton so guilty until proven innocent is Hillary Clinton's new justice motto?
— commonsense (@commonsense258) December 3, 2015
@jaketapper Oh cool, so the accused is guilty until proven innocent. Got it. @HillaryClinton
— CLA (@ConservativeLA) December 3, 2015
https://twitter.com/RobProvince/status/672511541552394240
https://twitter.com/Bagginator/status/672508871131336706
@jaketapper @HillaryClinton So she says all suspects accused of crime are guilty until proven innocent? WTH happened to the constitution?
— D.S. Edwards (@DSEdwardsAuthor) December 3, 2015
A few exit questions. We doubt Hillary will answer them, but we’re just gonna leave them here anyway:
@jaketapper @HillaryClinton So she initially believed her husband was a rapist? What steps did she take in response to that belief?
— Chance Gardener (@ChanceBGardener) December 3, 2015
@jaketapper @HillaryClinton And what evidence, specifically, changed her view? Was the quantum of evidence the same for each accuser?
— Chance Gardener (@ChanceBGardener) December 3, 2015
@jaketapper follow up question: what evidence convinced you that Jones, Willey, Broaddrick, et al were lying?
— Stephe96 (@Stephe96) December 3, 2015
Join the conversation as a VIP Member