This … is CNN:
— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) June 19, 2015
Wait … what?
@JohnEkdahl @seanmdav That's just some unassailable logic, right there. #wow
— Jon Munce (@jonmunce) June 19, 2015
https://twitter.com/NathanWurtzel/status/611986260920541184
Legitimately moronic, that is.
So, where did CNN get this from?
https://twitter.com/CharcoalPuppy/status/611985477764132864
https://twitter.com/DANEgerus/status/611983918623883265
Surely it must’ve come from somewhere, right?
@CharcoalPuppy @seanmdav tried to find the sourcing, but couldn't.
— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) June 19, 2015
@DANEgerus ¯_(ツ)_/¯ tried looking up the sourcing but couldn't find it.
— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) June 19, 2015
Well, if it’s trustworthy sourcing you’re looking for, you’re gonna come up pretty short.
@JohnEkdahl @EWErickson Oh look, they get their data from a left leaning outfit.
— cr (@propatriots) June 19, 2015
@JohnEkdahl NAF homepage includes a variety of interesting articles: pic.twitter.com/Uyb47mAu90
— Kevin in Albuquerque (@KevinInABQ) June 19, 2015
https://twitter.com/theshoebart/status/611997238378627072
.@JohnEkdahl @seanmdav Jonathan Soros, the son of George Soros, sits on NAF's Leadership Council: http://t.co/K5Aanvf2bz
— Josh Painter (@JoshPainter2154) June 19, 2015
This isn’t the first time CNN’s used the shady NAF as a source:
@JohnEkdahl @RocksEm Wrote about this here: http://t.co/rrW1oQWtGb
— John Sexton (@verumserum) June 19, 2015
Oh, and did we mention that CNN took some, um, liberties with the NAF’s “data”?
CNN takes a stat from New America Foundation labeled "nonjihadists" and changed it to Right Wing Extremism. Unreal. pic.twitter.com/Kw6zWKauMA
— Josh Jordan (@NumbersMuncher) June 19, 2015
These screencaps show CNN taking a NAF stat and deliberately changing it to blame conservatives. #CharlestonShooting pic.twitter.com/PtLOXiMo5c
— Josh Jordan (@NumbersMuncher) June 19, 2015
Guess it’s OK to mislead when it makes conservatives look bad, right?
https://twitter.com/theshoebart/status/611932271570857985
@JohnEkdahl It would be interesting to find out what defintions they are using. Is everything not done by a Muslim considered 'right wing"?
— RocksEm (@RocksEm) June 19, 2015
@RocksEm I assume so.
— John Ekdahl (@JohnEkdahl) June 19, 2015
Mais oui.
Fascinating cut-off date @JohnEkdahl. Coincidence, surely.
— Media Maters (@MediaMaters) June 19, 2015
https://twitter.com/laurakfillault/status/611992032895041536
@JohnEkdahl Funny how they always start counting the day AFTER Islamic terrorists killed 3,000 Americans. #Science #BigData
— Patrick Poole (@pspoole) June 19, 2015
@pspoole To include that would be racist. @JohnEkdahl
— Phineas Fahrquar (@irishspy) June 19, 2015
Three cheers for real journalism!
Left-wing fantasy world https://t.co/J9EFqsL11w
Actual real world http://t.co/FzR7taDaAv
— Dan McLaughlin (@baseballcrank) June 19, 2015
https://twitter.com/JustEric/status/611988115490775042
https://twitter.com/Heminator/status/611991600563134464
@JohnEkdahl @seanmdav what the hell?
— SOcean ?? (@SOcean5) June 19, 2015
@JohnEkdahl Ridiculous.
— Nope (@DonnaIsHereNow) June 19, 2015
The kind of misleading talking point that would bring a media choir of overreach if other way around.. RT @JohnEkdahl pic.twitter.com/IFUDnLorzS
— Josh Jordan (@NumbersMuncher) June 19, 2015
No media outcry over this, though.
If we exclude the 3000 killed on 9/11 and then subjectively label deaths since as right wing if it helps our cause.. https://t.co/Xd9q9kCEfe
— Josh Jordan (@NumbersMuncher) June 19, 2015
https://twitter.com/Isla_78/status/611933240702599168
You guys! I figured out how to get the left to admit Muslim extremism exists. https://t.co/YIEYxXf9tm
— Gabriel Malor (@gabrielmalor) June 19, 2015
@NumbersMuncher @JohnEkdahl My head is exploding. That's all I've got. Wow.
— Andy Keetch (@KeetchTX) June 19, 2015
@johnekdahl Lies, Damned Lies and CNN
— Occidentally on Purpose (@keshavb) June 19, 2015
Join the conversation as a VIP Member