'Dear God, help us!' How can Obama admin possibly think this is a good Iran strategy?

Oh yeah. We like this idea:

BREAKING: Officials: US considers letting Iran run nuclear centrifuges at fortified underground bunker.

— The Associated Press (@AP) March 26, 2015

Wait a second. Hold up:

Officials: US considers letting Iran run centrifuges at fortified underground bunker. (Deletes reference to 'nuclear' centrifuges.)

— The Associated Press (@AP) March 26, 2015

Whew! That was a close one!

Here's AP getting busted watering down the news. https://t.co/jsLiwxfWGV

— RBe (@RBPundit) March 26, 2015

https://twitter.com/CuffyMeh/status/581131306173628416

What harm can Iran do with a plain ol’ centrifuge, right?

Doesn't help MT @AP: US considers letting Iran run centrifuges at fortified underground bunker (Deletes reference to 'nuclear' centrifuges.)

— Ed Morrissey (@EdMorrissey) March 26, 2015

As opposed to…? MT @AP US considers letting Iran run centrifuges at fortified bunker. (Deletes reference to 'nuclear' centrifuges.)

— Matthew DesOrmeaux ⚜ (@authoridad) March 26, 2015

Wheeeeee!

The United States is considering letting Tehran run hundreds of centrifuges at a once-secret, fortified underground bunker in exchange for limits on centrifuge work and research and development at other sites, officials have told The Associated Press.

The trade-off would allow Iran to run several hundred of the devices at its Fordo facility, although the Iranians would not be allowed to do work that could lead to an atomic bomb and the site would be subject to international inspections, according to Western officials familiar with details of negotiations now underway. In return, Iran would be required to scale back the number of centrifuges it runs at its Natanz facility and accept other restrictions on nuclear-related work.

Instead of uranium, which can be enriched to be the fissile core of a nuclear weapon, any centrifuges permitted at Fordo would be fed elements such as zinc, xenon or germanium for separating out isotopes used in medicine, industry or science, the officials said. The number of centrifuges would not be enough to produce the amount of uranium needed to produce a weapon within a year — the minimum time-frame that Washington and its negotiating partners demand.