'The worst media slime': NYT published the name of Darren Wilson's street

Sarah D. | 6:09 PM on November 25, 2014

They may as well:

You are an absolute disgrace, @nytimes : http://t.co/V1V2C4HrvI

— Dana Loesch (@DLoesch) November 25, 2014

From the International Business Times yesterday:

The New York Times published information about the address (Editor’s note: Hyperlink removed by Twitchy) of Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson on Monday in a move that has generated controversy. Tensions are running high in Ferguson, Missouri, as the world awaits a St. Louis County grand jury’s decision on whether to indict the white policeman for the Aug. 9 shooting death of unarmed black teen Michael Brown.

…

A number of Twitter users — some of whom have identified themselves as planning to protest the grand jury decision — have tweeted the location of Wilson’s home as they gear up for rallies. The house number was not printed in the Times, but the street in the St. Louis suburb of Crestwood where it sits is only about two blocks long, and the house number can be easily located via online sources using only the street name and Wilson’s name.

The Times reported that Wilson and his new wife, fellow Ferguson Police Officer Barbara Spradling, have avoided the home for months. “They have scarcely been seen there since Mr. Brown was killed on Aug. 9,” the Times reported in the Monday article that included the street name. “Neighbors said that within a few days of the shooting, Officer Wilson and Officer Spradling abruptly left their home.”

https://twitter.com/michaelbd/status/537375848127397888

Not to mention completely unethical.

.@DLoesch Justice for the @nytimes is when you endanger the lives of those with whom you disagree

— Benjamin Weingarten (@bhweingarten) November 25, 2014