Donald Trump Delivers Pizza to FDNY
'Absolute Legend': Man Mocks UCLA Anti-Israel Protestors (WATCH)
Border Patrol Agent Accused of Whipping Illegal Immigrants Wins Award
Rep. Jamaal Bowman Declares Racist Daniel Penny Guilty of Murder Even Before the...
Here’s CNN’s EXCLUSIVE Framing of DOJ Civil Rights Chief Lying to the Senate
Title IX Reforms and Campus Protests Prove Government Will Not Protect You
Pro-Hamas Activists Tie Themselves to Flag Pole After Raising Palestinian Flag
Hims CEO Looking to Hire Protesters Who Know Moral Courage Beats a College...
Biden Continues to Earn the Respect of Other Countries by Calling Japan 'Xenophobic'
MSNBC's Joe Scarborough Tells Viewers If They're Too Stupid They Can Change the...
A Year After Biden Said We 'Ended Cancer' Patients Continue Dying From Shortages...
Pfizer CEO Proudly Boasts of Saving the World from COVID
The Time Has Come to Get Serious About Punishing and Removing Campus Tyrants
A Heartbeat Away: Supercut of Kamala Harris' Word Salad Is MAJOR Cringe
Columbia Law Students Urge School to Cancel Exams, as Violence has Left Them...

'Like poo-flinging monkeys': Journos high-five over 'hilarious' Benghazi report; Four Americans still dead

The House Intelligence Committee has reportedly concluded its seventh investigation into the 2012 attacks in Benghazi:

Advertisement

A two-year investigation by the Republican-controlled House Intelligence Committee has found that the CIA and the military acted properly in responding to the 2012 attack on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, and asserted no wrongdoing by Obama administration appointees.

Debunking a series of persistent allegations hinting at dark conspiracies, the investigation of the politically charged incident determined that there was no intelligence failure, no delay in sending a CIA rescue team, no missed opportunity for a military rescue, and no evidence the CIA was covertly shipping arms from Libya to Syria.

In the immediate aftermath of the attack, intelligence about who carried it out and why was contradictory, the report found. That led Susan Rice, then U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, to inaccurately assert that the attack had evolved from a protest, when in fact there had been no protest. But it was intelligence analysts, not political appointees, who made the wrong call, the committee found. The report did not conclude that Rice or any other government official acted in bad faith or intentionally misled the American people.

And the dedicated practitioners of “real journalism” are greeting the news with their characteristic professionalism:

Advertisement

Oh yes. Just hilarious.

https://twitter.com/fmanjoo/status/535936013579730944

https://twitter.com/drgrist/status/535928674281717760

https://twitter.com/AdamSerwer/status/535923767487524864

https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/535946924197949440

https://twitter.com/joshgreenman/status/535926788674056193

https://twitter.com/joshgreenman/status/535932622246268928

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/imillhiser/status/535939893068050432

No, Ron. You should be ashamed. You and all your media colleagues who are so eager to stick it to people who actually care about the four brave Americans who were murdered on September 11, 2012. In case you missed it, jackasses, those men are still dead. Their families are still in mourning.

Sure they are. They haven’t been interested in doing their jobs before. Why should they start now?

https://twitter.com/BecketAdams/status/535928910022594560

Advertisement

https://twitter.com/yesnicksearcy/status/535931263249428480

https://twitter.com/hboulware/status/535932159576784896

https://twitter.com/BecketAdams/status/535935215248494593

Editor’s note: This post has been updated with additional tweets.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement