And we’d expect nothing less from the likes of The Atlantic:
— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) November 18, 2014
Wait … what?
How does the coming duel between legislative and executive branch fit into the design of our Constitution?
The answer to the last question is easy. What’s coming will be painful, frustrating, and dangerous—and it will illustrate a constitutional malfunction unforeseen in 1787. The country will survive, and it’s possible it can even make progress—but at tremendous cost in polarization and missed opportunity. The country is like a car driving with the handbrake on: Any movement forward will be accompanied by smoke and internal damage.
So we might profitably put a six-month moratorium on paeans to the wisdom of the Framers. The problem of divided government is a bug, not a feature, and the Constitution itself provides no guidance on how to work around it.
Yeah, those Framers really screwed the pooch on that whole Constitution thing!
— Christy Lynn (@ChristyLynnLSU) November 18, 2014
@lachlan If only the men who wrote the Constitution had written some sort of explanation of the philosophy & reasoning behind it. If only…
— Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) November 18, 2014
Gosh, what were they thinking?
@chuck_dizzle That's amazing.
— Amelia (@AmeliaHammy) November 18, 2014
It’s old, and therefore wrong.