'History is old': Atlantic writer blames Framers for 'constitutional malfunction'

And we’d expect nothing less from the likes of The Atlantic:

Imperfect union: The Constitution didn't foresee a divided government http://t.co/4qYjxqdQ1l pic.twitter.com/wsi803XXfl

— The Atlantic (@TheAtlantic) November 18, 2014

Wait … what?

https://twitter.com/chuck_dizzle/status/534720705321902082

Oh, it’s a serious assertion, all right. More from writer Garrett Epps, who just so happens to be a constitutional law professor:

How does the coming duel between legislative and executive branch fit into the design of our Constitution?

The answer to the last question is easy. What’s coming will be painful, frustrating, and dangerous—and it will illustrate a constitutional malfunction unforeseen in 1787. The country will survive, and it’s possible it can even make progress—but at tremendous cost in polarization and missed opportunity. The country is like a car driving with the handbrake on: Any movement forward will be accompanied by smoke and internal damage.

So we might profitably put a six-month moratorium on paeans to the wisdom of the Framers. The problem of divided government is a bug, not a feature, and the Constitution itself provides no guidance on how to work around it.

Yeah, those Framers really screwed the pooch on that whole Constitution thing!

https://twitter.com/lachlan/status/534719477582413824

Recommended

Rachel Bitecofer tells Twitter women returning to being wives and moms is just like the Third Reich

Amy Curtis

Advertisement

Yeah, that is bad. RT @lachlan: This is so historically illiterate it boggles the mind http://t.co/0zIzVI3JNu http://t.co/OQmn1cah4F

— Christy Lynn (@ChristyLynnLSU) November 18, 2014

@lachlan If only the men who wrote the Constitution had written some sort of explanation of the philosophy & reasoning behind it. If only…

— Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) November 18, 2014

Gosh, what were they thinking?

@chuck_dizzle That's amazing.

— Amelia (@AmeliaHammy) November 18, 2014

https://twitter.com/NathanWurtzel/status/534720790567337984

It’s old, and therefore wrong.

https://twitter.com/DJB627/status/534722443412520961

https://twitter.com/ashtenthinks/status/534722788851187712

https://twitter.com/DJB627/status/534723235330686976

Ohhhh …