Welp, give The New Republic points for creativity with this one:
Kansas Republicans just invented a new form of voter suppression http://t.co/NyzodKLkar
— The New Republic (@newrepublic) September 5, 2014
So here’s the deal: Kansas Democrat Chad Taylor has been running against incumbent GOP Senator Pat Roberts, but the Independent candidate is currently beating him in the polls. So, what’s a flailing Dem to do? Why, drop out of the race, of course.
Unfortunately for Taylor, Kansas’ secretary of state isn’t letting him off the hook so easily. And The New Republic really doesn’t like that. Because … voter suppression?
The case will now go to the courts. Election law guru Rick Hasen writes that though Taylor has a case, the question of what the courts will do is a tossup. If they rule for Kobach, then Democrats will have to undertake the awkward task of asking voters not to vote for the Democrat on the ballot. But they’ll also have vouchsafed the strategy Republicans always employ when they fear the electorate isn’t on their side. Normally that means making it hard for Democrats to vote in the first place. This time around it means trying to trick low-information Democrats into voting for a candidate who isn’t running. But it’s still voter suppression.
It is? Since when?
https://twitter.com/instapundit/status/507981301241380864
How does he come up with this stuff? http://t.co/DgWnbQxfzU
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) September 5, 2014
https://twitter.com/dbetzel/status/507983790619492352
https://twitter.com/seanagnew/status/507984218106781696
Seriously, that’s hilarious. A candidate having to obey election laws is now “voter suppression”.
— American Journalists Publish Chinese Propaganda (@JohnEkdahl) September 5, 2014
Recommended
@instapundit @tnr It's suppressing their right to vote completely uninformed (and thus reflexively democrat.)
— tsrblke (@tsrblke) September 5, 2014
Heh.
.@zhanover Hey @brianbeutler, aren't you trying to suppress the vote of the people who chose Taylor in the primary?
— RBe (@RBPundit) September 5, 2014
Shorter @brianbeutler and @JohnBJudis: Kansas Democrats shouldn't be allowed to vote for their party's nominee. #SmartTake
— Drew McCoy (@_Drew_McCoy_) September 5, 2014
Really, this is just a recap of the Kansas Senate story with a one-line non sequitur tacked lazily onto the end: http://t.co/DgWnbQxfzU
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) September 5, 2014
https://twitter.com/SonnyBunch/status/507987463701553152
@instapundit @tnr Oh, how TNR has fallen. Can a magazine jump a shark? If so, consider that fish flown over.
— Cobalt Blue (@rightchemistry) September 5, 2014
https://twitter.com/SonnyBunch/status/507985979807129600
Journalism’s come a long way, baby.
I’m going to go back through my old pieces and just write “but it’s still death camps” at the end. Then, hopefully, TNR will hire me.
— Charles C. W. Cooke (@charlescwcooke) September 5, 2014
***
Related:
Join the conversation as a VIP Member