Try Not to Roll Your Eyes at the United Nations' New Ally in...
NYU Protester Describes the Ordeal of Her Arrest, Assumes Cops Are White Supremacists
Biden Blesses Abortion, CNN's Romance with Radicals!
Snake in the Grass Nina Jankowicz Returns With Perfectly Named 'Disinformation' Think Tank
Pro-Palestine Protester Has to Ask a Friend Why She’s Protesting
Judge Tells Dexter Taylor, NY Man Facing YEARS in Prison the Second Amendment...
Biden Goes Full Ron Burgundy (AGAIN) and Reads EVERYTHING on the Teleprompter
We Warned You: Totally-Not-A-Dictator Biden Admin Plans to Use 'Climate Crisis' to Get...
We Don't Believe You! Watch As Christopher Wray Says FBI Doesn't Monitor Protests
MSNBC Segment on 'Truly Shocking' Allegation About Trump and Media Stumps Self-Awareness D...
NPR Reporter: 'Ackshually, We're Pretty Great'
Biden Reminds Us After Signing $95 Billion Foreign Aid Bill That the US...
Dad Goes Off on Woke School Board Following Attack by Trans Student
Biden Often Sees Devastating Effects From Burning Fossil Fuels While Aboard His Personal...
Karol Markowicz BURIES Morning Mika's Florida Gaslighting With a Single Photograph

'She's racist, right?' Joan Walsh wonders if Hillary's trying to undermine Obama on Bergdahl

Ruh-roh … here comes Joan!


On the heels of a Daily Beast article claiming that when the possibility of a Taliban-Bergdahl swap arose a few years ago, then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was “not a fan of the idea,” Salon’s Walsh is dutifully running interference for Obama:

Who knew The Daily Beast was such a thought hub for the Right?

For the record, Walsh says she hopes Hillary’s standing firmly behind The One:

I’ll admit I’m slightly dismayed by the mixed signals coming from Camp Clinton. At best – assuming she supports the president’s Bergdahl decision – she’s still plagued by supporters who see political gain in undermining Obama. Assuming she’s running for president again, I’d like to see more discipline in the ranks this time around.

And that’s the best-case scenario. The worst is that she is, as some suggest, authorizing these anonymous accounts of her tougher stance in 2012 to at least sow confusion about whether she support’s Obama’s controversial “hard choice.” That would be tragic. If Clinton still thinks her path to the White House involves being more hawkish than Barack Obama, as well as undermining our first black president, she didn’t learn anything from 2008. And she won’t get there this time, either.

I happen to think she’s smarter than that, and gremlins in the media and on the right are sowing this dissent. I hope I’m right.


And, well, if it turns out that Hillary is indeed trying to undermine Obama, then there’s only one logical conclusion that can be drawn:

Walsh evidently wants to keep that possibility on the table:

It’s all she knows.


Decisions, decisions!

In any event, there’s a lesson to be learned here:



Twitchy coverage of Joan Walsh

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Twitchy Videos