The DESPERATE Way Eric Swalwell Is Trying to SPIN 'Fake Residency' Story, WOW,...
'Should Be Immediately Retracted'! Karoline Leavitt Shreds ABC News' 'BREAKING' Iran Threa...
CNN Takes a Break From Parroting Regime Propaganda and Just Plugs Into Iranian...
The First Great Awakening: A Revival That Prepared America for Independence
Dems Accusing GOP of Blocking Their Attempts to Fund FEMA, TSA and More...
Jessica Tarlov Does Her DAMNEDEST to Make U.S.'s Actions in Iran a FAILURE...
So Shellfish! Scott Jennings Confronts Paul Begala for Saying Hegseth Blew Millions on...
Worst ... Sitcom ... EVER! Tom Steyer Alleges Eric Swalwell Rents a Single...
'How Is It That They Don't Know This?' Salena Zito Shames Dems/Media Who...
Masterclass in STUPID: Gun-Grabbing VA Democrat DRAGGED for BULLS**T Rationale Behind Bann...
Hypocrisy Alert: Mamdani Turns City Hall Into Ramadan Central While Left Demands Christian...
Turncoat Kinzinger: No Respect for Troops Getting the Surf & Turf He Once...
Hypocrite Josh Shapiro Uses Squatter's Rights to Build Himself a Security Barrier on...
Monumental Idea: A 'Mount Rushmore' to Honor CNN’s Most Ridiculous Cringeworthy Moments
Democrat Operatives Now Very Concerned With Fiscal Responsibility

Merrick Garland refuses to admit that biological male prisoners could pose risk to female prisoners

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland is testifying today at a Senate Judiciary Committee oversight hearing, and in doing so is helping to remind us why we can’t stand him.

Advertisement

Transcript:

Lindsey Graham: “When it comes to federal prisons, are you aware that 1200 prisoners are requesting to be sent from a male prison to a female prison?”

Merrick Garland: “I’m not, no.”

Graham: “OK. Um, what is our policy when it comes to allowing a male prisoner to be transitioned into a female prison?”

Garland: “Uh, I think, uh, if you’re generally asking the question of how, um, trans people are dealt with in the Bureau of Prisons, my understanding, um, is that these are, uh, determinations about, um, uh, where they’re placed or where people are placed in general have to do with individualized determinations regarding the security of that individual, um, and the management of the prison, these are done on a case-by-case basis. That’s my understanding.”

Graham: “Are you aware of any policy guidelines that they use to make that determination?”

Garland: “I think there is a policy guideline along the lines that I just said, that, that, they are …”

Graham: “I would like for the Bureau of Prisons to send it to us. Are you concerned that if a biological male was sent to a female prison, that could be a risk to female prisoners?”

Garland: “I think every, uh, uh, person in prison has to be dealt with, uh, with dignity and respect. Uh, that determinations of the safety questions you’re talking about have to be made on an individualized basis.”

Advertisement

We get that the “Hon.” in front of his name is kind of the way these things are done, but truth be told, there’s nothing remotely honorable about Garland’s position.

Nailed it.

It’s not an answer. But it still says a lot about Garland. And none of it’s good.

We’ve said it before, but it bears repeating: We really dodged a bullet when the Senate GOP filibustered his SCOTUS nomination.

***

Related:

American Medical Association asks Attorney General Merrick Garland to look into those coordinating threats against children’s hospitals

Advertisement

***

Join us in the fight. Become a Twitchy VIP member today and use promo code SAVEAMERICA to receive a 40% discount on your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Twitchy Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement